Literature DB >> 31188678

Quantitative evaluation of artefact reduction from metallic dental materials in short tau inversion recovery imaging: efficacy of syngo WARP at 3.0 tesla.

Lan Thi Xuan Tran1, Junichiro Sakamoto1, Ami Kuribayashi1, Hiroshi Watanabe1, Hiroshi Tomisato2, Tohru Kurabayashi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of syngo WARP on reducing metal artefacts from dental materials.
METHODS: Short tau inversion recovery (STIR) with syngo WARP [a dedicated metal artefact reduction sequence in combination with view-angle-tilting (VAT)] was performed using phantoms of three dental alloys: cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr), nickel-chromium (Ni-Cr), and titanium (Ti). Artefact volumes and reduction ratios of black, white and overall artefacts in the standard STIR and syngo WARP images with several different parameter settings were quantified according to standards of the American Society for Testing and Materials F2119-07. In all sequences, the artefact volumes and reduction ratios were compared. The modulation transfer function (MTF) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also measured for evaluation of image quality.
RESULTS: In standard STIR, the overall artefact volume of Co-Cr was markedly larger than those of Ni-Cr and Ti. All types of artefacts tended to be reduced with increasing receiver bandwidth (rBW) and VAT. The effect of artefact reduction tended to be more obvious in the axial plane than in the sagittal plane. Compared with standard STIR, syngo WARP with a matrix of 384 × 384, receiver bandwidth of 620 Hz/pixel, and VAT of 100 % in the axial plane obtained reduction effects of 30 % (white artefacts), 45 % (black artefacts), and 38 % (overall artefacts) although MTF and CNR decreased by 30 and 22 % compared with those of standard STIR, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: syngo WARP for STIR can effectively reduce metal artefacts from dental materials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  syngo WARP; artifact reduction; dental materials; view angle tilting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31188678      PMCID: PMC6775784          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20190036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  19 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques.

Authors:  Shannon H Kolind; Alex L MacKay; Peter L Munk; Qing-San Xiang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Imaging near metal with a MAVRIC-SEMAC hybrid.

Authors:  K M Koch; A C Brau; W Chen; G E Gold; B A Hargreaves; M Koff; G C McKinnon; H G Potter; K F King
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  MR Imaging with Metal-suppression Sequences for Evaluation of Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brett S Talbot; Eric P Weinberg
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Reduction of blurring in view angle tilting MRI.

Authors:  Kim Butts; John M Pauly; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Metallic artifacts in MRI caused by dental alloys and magnetic keeper.

Authors:  Darline Destine; Hiroshi Mizutani; Yoshimasa Igarashi
Journal:  Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2008-04

6.  Usefulness of metal artifact reduction with WARP technique at 1.5 and 3T MRI in imaging metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  Andrea Lazik; Stefan Landgraeber; Patrick Schulte; Oliver Kraff; Thomas C Lauenstein; Jens M Theysohn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Advances in MRI around metal.

Authors:  Pia M Jungmann; Christoph A Agten; Christian W Pfirrmann; Reto Sutter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Influence of dental materials on dental MRI.

Authors:  O Tymofiyeva; S Vaegler; K Rottner; J Boldt; A J Hopfgartner; P C Proff; E J Richter; P M Jakob
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Accelerated slice encoding for metal artifact correction.

Authors:  Brian A Hargreaves; Weitian Chen; Wenmiao Lu; Marcus T Alley; Garry E Gold; Anja C S Brau; John M Pauly; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  A standardized evaluation of artefacts from metallic compounds during fast MR imaging.

Authors:  Shumei Murakami; Rinus G Verdonschot; Miyoshi Kataoka; Naoya Kakimoto; Hiroaki Shimamoto; Sven Kreiborg
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.419

View more
  2 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts caused by orthodontic appliances and/or implant-supported prosthesis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katrine Mølgaard Johannsen; João Marcus de Carvalho E Silva Fuglsig; Brian Hansen; Ann Wenzel; Rubens Spin-Neto
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.882

2.  Performance of PROPELLER FSE T2WI in reducing metal artifacts of material porcelain fused to metal crown: a clinical preliminary study.

Authors:  Wenjin Li; Jing Shi; Wenjin Bian; Jianting Li; Xiaoqing Chen; Juan Feng; Jiali Yu; Jun Wang; Jinliang Niu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.