Literature DB >> 15332257

Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques.

Shannon H Kolind1, Alex L MacKay, Peter L Munk, Qing-San Xiang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a technique to quantify artifact, and to use it to compare the effectiveness of several approaches to metal artifact reduction, including view angle tilting and increasing the slice select and image bandwidths (BWs), in terms of metal artifact reduction, noise, and blur.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nonmetallic replicas of two metal implants (stainless steel and titanium/chromium-cobalt femoral prostheses) were fabricated from wax, and MR images were obtained of each component immersed in water. The differences between the images of each metal prosthesis and its wax counterpart were measured. The contributions from noise and blur were isolated, resulting in a measure of the metal artifact. Several off-resonance artifact reduction techniques were assessed in terms of metal artifact reduction capability, as well as signal to noise ratio and blur.
RESULTS: Increasing the image BW from +/-16 kHz to +/-64 kHz was found to reduce the artifact by an average of 60%, while employing view angle tilting (VAT) alone was found to reduce the artifact by an average of 63%. The metal artifact reduction sequence (MARS), which combines several susceptibility artifact reduction techniques, resulted in the least amount of image distortion, reducing the artifact by an average of 79%.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that while VAT alone (with an image BW of +/-16 kHz) resulted in the smallest amount of total energy and no reduction in the signal-to-noise ratio compared to a conventional spin-echo pulse sequence, MARS resulted in significantly less artifact and dramatically less blur. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15332257     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  24 in total

1.  Modeling of active shimming of metallic needles for interventional MRI.

Authors:  Saikat Sengupta
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  An illustrative review to understand and manage metal-induced artifacts in musculoskeletal MRI: a primer and updates.

Authors:  J P Dillenseger; S Molière; P Choquet; C Goetz; M Ehlinger; G Bierry
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artefacts in hip prostheses: a comparison of different prosthetic compositions.

Authors:  Elisabetta Panfili; Laura Pierdicca; Luca Salvolini; Luigi Imperiale; Jeffrey Dubbini; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Usefulness of metal artifact reduction with WARP technique at 1.5 and 3T MRI in imaging metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  Andrea Lazik; Stefan Landgraeber; Patrick Schulte; Oliver Kraff; Thomas C Lauenstein; Jens M Theysohn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Comparative study of fat-suppression techniques for hip arthroplasty MR imaging.

Authors:  Sébastien Molière; Jean-Philippe Dillenseger; Matthieu Ehlinger; Stéphane Kremer; Guillaume Bierry
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  View angle tilting echo planar imaging for distortion correction.

Authors:  Sinyeob Ahn; Xiaoping P Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Using the dGEMRIC technique to evaluate cartilage health in the presence of surgical hardware at 3T: comparison of inversion recovery and saturation recovery approaches.

Authors:  Agnes G d'Entremont; Shannon H Kolind; Burkhard Mädler; David R Wilson; Alexander L MacKay
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Metal-induced artifacts in MRI.

Authors:  Brian A Hargreaves; Pauline W Worters; Kim Butts Pauly; John M Pauly; Kevin M Koch; Garry E Gold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Advanced MRI strategies for assessing spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Seth A Smith; James J Pekar; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2012

10.  A standardized evaluation of artefacts from metallic compounds during fast MR imaging.

Authors:  Shumei Murakami; Rinus G Verdonschot; Miyoshi Kataoka; Naoya Kakimoto; Hiroaki Shimamoto; Sven Kreiborg
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.