Literature DB >> 26587889

MR Imaging with Metal-suppression Sequences for Evaluation of Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Brett S Talbot1, Eric P Weinberg1.   

Abstract

Metallic artifact at orthopedic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging continues to be an important problem, particularly in the realm of total joint arthroplasty. Complications often follow total joint arthroplasty and can be expected for a small percentage of all implanted devices. Postoperative complications involve not only osseous structures but also adjacent soft tissues-a highly problematic area at MR imaging because of artifacts from metallic prostheses. Without special considerations, susceptibility artifacts from ferromagnetic implants can unacceptably degrade image quality. Common artifacts include in-plane distortions (signal loss and signal pileup), poor or absent fat suppression, geometric distortion, and through-section distortion. Basic methods to reduce metallic artifacts include use of spin-echo or fast spin-echo sequences with long echo train lengths, short inversion time inversion-recovery (STIR) sequences for fat suppression, a high bandwidth, thin section selection, and an increased matrix. With care and attention to the alloy type (eg, titanium, cobalt-chromium, stainless steel), orientation of the implant, and magnetic field strength, as well as use of proprietary and nonproprietary metal-suppression techniques, previously nondiagnostic studies can yield key diagnostic information. Specifically, sequences such as the metal artifact reduction sequence (MARS), WARP (Siemens Healthcare, Munich, Germany), slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC), and multiacquisition with variable-resonance image combination (MAVRIC) can be optimized to reveal pathologic conditions previously hidden by periprosthetic artifacts. Complications of total joint arthroplasty that can be evaluated by using MR imaging with metal-suppression sequences include pseudotumoral conditions such as metallosis and particle disease, infection, aseptic prosthesis loosening, tendon injury, and muscle injury. ©RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26587889     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  38 in total

1.  Imaging evaluation of polyethylene liner dissociation in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yoshimi Endo; Christian Geannette; William T Chang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Comparative study of fat-suppression techniques for hip arthroplasty MR imaging.

Authors:  Sébastien Molière; Jean-Philippe Dillenseger; Matthieu Ehlinger; Stéphane Kremer; Guillaume Bierry
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Pharmacokinetic and Biodistribution Studies of HPMA Copolymer Conjugates in an Aseptic Implant Loosening Mouse Model.

Authors:  Xin Wei; Fei Li; Gang Zhao; Yashpal Singh Chhonker; Christine Averill; Josselyn Galdamez; P Edward Purdue; Xiaoyan Wang; Edward V Fehringer; Kevin L Garvin; Steven R Goldring; Yazen Alnouti; Dong Wang
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  Recent advances in MRI of the head and neck, skull base and cranial nerves: new and evolving sequences, analyses and clinical applications.

Authors:  Philip Touska; Steve E J Connor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Validation of a new classification for periprosthetic shoulder fractures.

Authors:  Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Marc Beirer; Ulrich Brunner; Arne Buchholz; Peter Biberthaler; Moritz Crönlein
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Diagnosis of peripheral bone and prosthetic joint infections: overview on the consensus documents by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement).

Authors:  Luca Maria Sconfienza; Alberto Signore; Victor Cassar-Pullicino; Maria Adriana Cataldo; Olivier Gheysens; Olivier Borens; Andrej Trampuz; Klaus Wörtler; Nicola Petrosillo; Heinz Winkler; Filip M H M Vanhoenacker; Paul C Jutte; Andor W J M Glaudemans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  MRI after Bonebridge implantation: a comparison of two implant generations.

Authors:  Cristina Utrilla; Javier Gavilán; Pilar García-Raya; Miryam Calvino; Luis Lassaletta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Prosthetic joint infections: diagnosis, management, and complications of the two-stage replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jack Porrino; Annie Wang; Austin Moats; Hyojeong Mulcahy; Kimia Kani
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences.

Authors:  Tim Hilgenfeld; Marcel Prager; Franz S Schwindling; Johann M E Jende; Peter Rammelsberg; Martin Bendszus; Sabine Heiland; Alexander Juerchott
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Quantitative evaluation of artefact reduction from metallic dental materials in short tau inversion recovery imaging: efficacy of syngo WARP at 3.0 tesla.

Authors:  Lan Thi Xuan Tran; Junichiro Sakamoto; Ami Kuribayashi; Hiroshi Watanabe; Hiroshi Tomisato; Tohru Kurabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.