Literature DB >> 31181567

Off-target RNA mutation induced by DNA base editing and its elimination by mutagenesis.

Changyang Zhou1,2, Yidi Sun2,3,4, Rui Yan5, Yajing Liu2,6, Erwei Zuo1,7, Chan Gu5, Linxiao Han1, Yu Wei1, Xinde Hu1,2, Rong Zeng3,6, Yixue Li8,9,10, Haibo Zhou11, Fan Guo12, Hui Yang13.   

Abstract

Recently developed DNA base editing methods enable the direct generation of desired point mutations in genomic DNA without generating any double-strand breaks1-3, but the issue of off-target edits has limited the application of these methods. Although several previous studies have evaluated off-target mutations in genomic DNA4-8, it is now clear that the deaminases that are integral to commonly used DNA base editors often bind to RNA9-13. For example, the cytosine deaminase APOBEC1-which is used in cytosine base editors (CBEs)-targets both DNA and RNA12, and the adenine deaminase TadA-which is used in adenine base editors (ABEs)-induces site-specific inosine formation on RNA9,11. However, any potential RNA mutations caused by DNA base editors have not been evaluated. Adeno-associated viruses are the most common delivery system for gene therapies that involve DNA editing; these viruses can sustain long-term gene expression in vivo, so the extent of potential RNA mutations induced by DNA base editors is of great concern14-16. Here we quantitatively evaluated RNA single nucleotide variations (SNVs) that were induced by CBEs or ABEs. Both the cytosine base editor BE3 and the adenine base editor ABE7.10 generated tens of thousands of off-target RNA SNVs. Subsequently, by engineering deaminases, we found that three CBE variants and one ABE variant showed a reduction in off-target RNA SNVs to the baseline while maintaining efficient DNA on-target activity. This study reveals a previously overlooked aspect of off-target effects in DNA editing and also demonstrates that such effects can be eliminated by engineering deaminases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31181567     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1314-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  122 in total

1.  Sequence-specific prediction of the efficiencies of adenine and cytosine base editors.

Authors:  Myungjae Song; Hui Kwon Kim; Sungtae Lee; Younggwang Kim; Sang-Yeon Seo; Jinman Park; Jae Woo Choi; Hyewon Jang; Jeong Hong Shin; Seonwoo Min; Zhejiu Quan; Ji Hun Kim; Hoon Chul Kang; Sungroh Yoon; Hyongbum Henry Kim
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  CRISPR, animals, and FDA oversight: Building a path to success.

Authors:  Laura R Epstein; Stella S Lee; Mayumi F Miller; Heather A Lombardi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  In vivo base editing restores sensory transduction and transiently improves auditory function in a mouse model of recessive deafness.

Authors:  Wei-Hsi Yeh; Olga Shubina-Oleinik; Jonathan M Levy; Bifeng Pan; Gregory A Newby; Michael Wornow; Rachel Burt; Jonathan C Chen; Jeffrey R Holt; David R Liu
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Recent advances of genome editing and related technologies in China.

Authors:  Wen Sun; Haoyi Wang
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 5.  Base Editors: Modular Tools for the Introduction of Point Mutations in Living Cells.

Authors:  Mallory Evanoff; Alexis C Komor
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2019-09-10

Review 6.  Prostate cancer research: The next generation; report from the 2019 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy Meeting.

Authors:  Andrea K Miyahira; Adam Sharp; Leigh Ellis; Jennifer Jones; Salma Kaochar; H Benjamin Larman; David A Quigley; Huihui Ye; Jonathan W Simons; Kenneth J Pienta; Howard R Soule
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 7.  Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors.

Authors:  Andrew V Anzalone; Luke W Koblan; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Enabling large-scale genome editing at repetitive elements by reducing DNA nicking.

Authors:  Cory J Smith; Oscar Castanon; Khaled Said; Verena Volf; Parastoo Khoshakhlagh; Amanda Hornick; Raphael Ferreira; Chun-Ting Wu; Marc Güell; Shilpa Garg; Alex H M Ng; Hannu Myllykallio; George M Church
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  In vivo HSPC gene therapy with base editors allows for efficient reactivation of fetal γ-globin in β-YAC mice.

Authors:  Chang Li; Aphrodite Georgakopoulou; Arpit Mishra; Sucheol Gil; R David Hawkins; Evangelia Yannaki; André Lieber
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-02-23

10.  Detect-seq reveals out-of-protospacer editing and target-strand editing by cytosine base editors.

Authors:  Zhixin Lei; Haowei Meng; Zhicong Lv; Menghao Liu; Huanan Zhao; Hao Wu; Xiaoxue Zhang; Lulu Liu; Yuan Zhuang; Kailin Yin; Yongchang Yan; Chengqi Yi
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.