Literature DB >> 33620431

In vivo HSPC gene therapy with base editors allows for efficient reactivation of fetal γ-globin in β-YAC mice.

Chang Li1, Aphrodite Georgakopoulou1,2, Arpit Mishra1, Sucheol Gil1, R David Hawkins1, Evangelia Yannaki2,3, André Lieber1,3.   

Abstract

Base editors are capable of installing precise genomic alterations without creating double-strand DNA breaks. In this study, we targeted critical motifs regulating γ-globin reactivation with base editors delivered via HDAd5/35++ vectors. Through optimized design, we successfully produced a panel of cytidine and adenine base editor (ABE) vectors targeting the erythroid BCL11A enhancer or recreating naturally occurring hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin (HPFH) mutations in the HBG1/2 promoter. All 5 tested vectors efficiently installed target base conversion and led to γ-globin reactivation in human erythroid progenitor cells. We observed ~23% γ-globin protein production over β-globin, when using an ABE vector (HDAd-ABE-sgHBG-2) specific to the -113A>G HPFH mutation. In a β-YAC mouse model, in vivo hematopoietic progenitor/stem cell (HSPC) transduction with HDAd-ABE-sgHBG-2 followed by in vivo selection resulted in >40% γ-globin+ erythrocytes in the peripheral blood. This result corresponded to 21% γ-globin production over human β-globin. The average -113A>G conversion in total bone marrow cells was 20%. No alterations in hematological parameters, erythropoiesis, and bone marrow cellular composition were observed after treatment. No detectable editing was found at top-scoring, off-target genomic sites. Bone marrow lineage-negative cells from primary mice were capable of reconstituting secondary transplant-recipient mice with stable γ-globin expression. Importantly, the advantage of base editing over CRISPR/Cas9 was reflected by the markedly lower rates of intergenic HBG1/2 deletion and the absence of detectable toxicity in human CD34+ cells. Our observations suggest that HDAd-vectorized base editors represent a promising strategy for precise in vivo genome engineering for the treatment of β-hemoglobinopathies.
© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33620431      PMCID: PMC7903237          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  55 in total

1.  Human fetal hemoglobin expression is regulated by the developmental stage-specific repressor BCL11A.

Authors:  Vijay G Sankaran; Tobias F Menne; Jian Xu; Thomas E Akie; Guillaume Lettre; Ben Van Handel; Hanna K A Mikkola; Joel N Hirschhorn; Alan B Cantor; Stuart H Orkin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Reactivation of γ-globin expression through Cas9 or base editor to treat β-hemoglobinopathies.

Authors:  Liren Wang; Linxi Li; Yanlin Ma; Handan Hu; Qi Li; Yang Yang; Wenbang Liu; Shuming Yin; Wei Li; Bin Fu; Ryo Kurita; Yukio Nakamura; Mingyao Liu; Yongrong Lai; Dali Li
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 25.617

3.  Treatment of a Mouse Model of ALS by In Vivo Base Editing.

Authors:  Colin K W Lim; Michael Gapinske; Alexandra K Brooks; Wendy S Woods; Jackson E Powell; M Alejandra Zeballos C; Jackson Winter; Pablo Perez-Pinera; Thomas Gaj
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  Therapeutic base editing of human hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Jing Zeng; Yuxuan Wu; Chunyan Ren; Jasmine Bonanno; Anne H Shen; Devlin Shea; Jason M Gehrke; Kendell Clement; Kevin Luk; Qiuming Yao; Rachel Kim; Scot A Wolfe; John P Manis; Luca Pinello; J Keith Joung; Daniel E Bauer
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 5.  Emerging Genetic Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Stuart H Orkin; Daniel E Bauer
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 13.739

6.  Systematic comparison of constitutive promoters and the doxycycline-inducible promoter.

Authors:  Jane Yuxia Qin; Li Zhang; Kayla L Clift; Imge Hulur; Andy Peng Xiang; Bing-Zhong Ren; Bruce T Lahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces a p53-mediated DNA damage response.

Authors:  Emma Haapaniemi; Sandeep Botla; Jenna Persson; Bernhard Schmierer; Jussi Taipale
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Efficient genome editing in hematopoietic stem cells with helper-dependent Ad5/35 vectors expressing site-specific endonucleases under microRNA regulation.

Authors:  Kamola Saydaminova; Xun Ye; Hongjie Wang; Maximilian Richter; Martin Ho; HongZhuan Chen; Ning Xu; Jin-Soo Kim; Eirini Papapetrou; Michael C Holmes; Philip D Gregory; Donna Palmer; Philip Ng; Anja Ehrhardt; André Lieber
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 6.698

9.  GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases.

Authors:  Shengdar Q Tsai; Zongli Zheng; Nhu T Nguyen; Matthew Liebers; Ved V Topkar; Vishal Thapar; Nicolas Wyvekens; Cyd Khayter; A John Iafrate; Long P Le; Martin J Aryee; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Establishment of immortalized human erythroid progenitor cell lines able to produce enucleated red blood cells.

Authors:  Ryo Kurita; Noriko Suda; Kazuhiro Sudo; Kenichi Miharada; Takashi Hiroyama; Hiroyuki Miyoshi; Kenzaburo Tani; Yukio Nakamura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic in vivo delivery of gene editing agents.

Authors:  Aditya Raguram; Samagya Banskota; David R Liu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 66.850

Review 2.  Catching Them Early: Framework Parameters and Progress for Prenatal and Childhood Application of Advanced Therapies.

Authors:  Carsten W Lederer; Lola Koniali; Tina Buerki-Thurnherr; Panayiota L Papasavva; Stefania La Grutta; Amelia Licari; Frantisek Staud; Donato Bonifazi; Marina Kleanthous
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 3.  In vivo somatic cell base editing and prime editing.

Authors:  Gregory A Newby; David R Liu
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 4.  CRISPR/Cas-Dependent and Nuclease-Free In Vivo Therapeutic Gene Editing.

Authors:  Ishani Dasgupta; Terence R Flotte; Allison M Keeler
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 4.793

5.  Safe and efficient in vivo hematopoietic stem cell transduction in nonhuman primates using HDAd5/35++ vectors.

Authors:  Chang Li; Hongjie Wang; Sucheol Gil; Audrey Germond; Connie Fountain; Audrey Baldessari; Jiho Kim; Zhinan Liu; Aphrodite Georgakopoulou; Stefan Radtke; Tamás Raskó; Amit Pande; Christina Chiang; Eli Chin; Evangelia Yannaki; Zsuzsanna Izsvák; Thalia Papayannopoulou; Hans-Peter Kiem; André Lieber
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 6.  Gene Editing for Inherited Red Blood Cell Diseases.

Authors:  Oscar Quintana-Bustamante; Sara Fañanas-Baquero; Mercedes Dessy-Rodriguez; Isabel Ojeda-Pérez; Jose-Carlos Segovia
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 7.  Recent advances in "sickle and niche" research - Tribute to Dr. Paul S Frenette.

Authors:  Lidiane S Torres; Noboru Asada; Mitchell J Weiss; Andreas Trumpp; Toshio Suda; David T Scadden; Keisuke Ito
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 7.294

Review 8.  Translational potential of base-editing tools for gene therapy of monogenic diseases.

Authors:  Vasiliy V Reshetnikov; Angelina V Chirinskaite; Julia V Sopova; Roman A Ivanov; Elena I Leonova
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-10

9.  Correction of Fanconi Anemia Mutations Using Digital Genome Engineering.

Authors:  Christopher J Sipe; Mitchell G Kluesner; Samuel P Bingea; Walker S Lahr; Aneesha A Andrew; Minjing Wang; Anthony P DeFeo; Timothy L Hinkel; Kanut Laoharawee; John E Wagner; Margaret L MacMillan; Gregory M Vercellotti; Jakub Tolar; Mark J Osborn; R Scott McIvor; Beau R Webber; Branden S Moriarity
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.208

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.