BACKGROUND: Wnt signaling is a cellular pathway involved in embryogenesis, development, and neoplasia. Wnt-pathway activation may accelerate prostate cancer androgen-independent growth and mediate antiandrogen resistance. Since 10-20% of advanced prostate cancers harbor Wnt-activating mutations, we aimed to characterize the clinical features and response to novel antiandrogens in such patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who harbor Wnt-pathway mutations have poorer responses to first-line novel hormonal therapies: abiraterone/enzalutamide. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with mCRPC who received first-line abiraterone or enzalutamide were retrospectively evaluated. Using tumor DNA analyses, we queried for activating mutations in CTNNB1 or inactivating mutations in APC or RNF43, all of which are predicted to stimulate Wnt signaling. Presence or absence of at least one Wnt-activating alteration was correlated with clinical-pathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, overall survival (OS), and PSA response were measured. Cox regression models were used to test associations between Wnt status and clinical-pathologic outcomes; Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were used to compare time-to-event endpoints. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 137 patients evaluated, 11% (n=15) had tumor DNA analysis showing at least one Wnt-stimulating alteration. Patients with Wnt-activating mutations had numerically fewer T3/T4 tumors than Wnt wild-type patients (31% vs 51%), but were otherwise generally balanced. Median time to PSA progression on first-line abiraterone/enzalutamide was shorter in Wnt-activated patients (6.5 vs 9.6mo, hazard ratio [HR] 2.34, p=0.003), as was OS (23.6 vs 27.7mo, HR 2.28, p=0.01). PSA responses were numerically worse in Wnt-activated patients (53% vs 75%, p=0.12). Presence of Wnt-activating alterations (adjusted HR [aHR] 2.33, p=0.007) and use of previous chemotherapy (aHR 1.83, p=0.004) were both independently associated with increased hazard of progression. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with somatic Wnt-pathway activating mutations have worse outcomes to first-line abiraterone/enzalutamide than Wnt wild-type patients. Our data suggest that additional genomically informed therapies are needed for this relevant subset of mCRPC patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we retrospectively examined outcomes of metastatic prostate cancer patients with or without Wnt-pathway mutations who received abiraterone or enzalutamide for the first time, in order to examine whether these mutations affect the prognosis. Our study suggested that patients who have Wnt-pathway activating mutations derived less benefit from abiraterone and enzalutamide when compared to patients without these mutations. We conclude that Wnt-pathway mutations might decrease the effectiveness of abiraterone and enzalutamide, and we propose that the Wnt pathway might be a good therapeutic target for these patients, in order to potentially reverse or prolong resistance to abiraterone and enzalutamide in men with Wnt mutations.
BACKGROUND: Wnt signaling is a cellular pathway involved in embryogenesis, development, and neoplasia. Wnt-pathway activation may accelerate prostate cancer androgen-independent growth and mediate antiandrogen resistance. Since 10-20% of advanced prostate cancers harbor Wnt-activating mutations, we aimed to characterize the clinical features and response to novel antiandrogens in such patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who harbor Wnt-pathway mutations have poorer responses to first-line novel hormonal therapies: abiraterone/enzalutamide. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with mCRPC who received first-line abiraterone or enzalutamide were retrospectively evaluated. Using tumor DNA analyses, we queried for activating mutations in CTNNB1 or inactivating mutations in APC or RNF43, all of which are predicted to stimulate Wnt signaling. Presence or absence of at least one Wnt-activating alteration was correlated with clinical-pathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, overall survival (OS), and PSA response were measured. Cox regression models were used to test associations between Wnt status and clinical-pathologic outcomes; Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were used to compare time-to-event endpoints. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 137 patients evaluated, 11% (n=15) had tumor DNA analysis showing at least one Wnt-stimulating alteration. Patients with Wnt-activating mutations had numerically fewer T3/T4 tumors than Wnt wild-type patients (31% vs 51%), but were otherwise generally balanced. Median time to PSA progression on first-line abiraterone/enzalutamide was shorter in Wnt-activated patients (6.5 vs 9.6mo, hazard ratio [HR] 2.34, p=0.003), as was OS (23.6 vs 27.7mo, HR 2.28, p=0.01). PSA responses were numerically worse in Wnt-activated patients (53% vs 75%, p=0.12). Presence of Wnt-activating alterations (adjusted HR [aHR] 2.33, p=0.007) and use of previous chemotherapy (aHR 1.83, p=0.004) were both independently associated with increased hazard of progression. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with somatic Wnt-pathway activating mutations have worse outcomes to first-line abiraterone/enzalutamide than Wnt wild-type patients. Our data suggest that additional genomically informed therapies are needed for this relevant subset of mCRPC patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we retrospectively examined outcomes of metastatic prostate cancerpatients with or without Wnt-pathway mutations who received abiraterone or enzalutamide for the first time, in order to examine whether these mutations affect the prognosis. Our study suggested that patients who have Wnt-pathway activating mutations derived less benefit from abiraterone and enzalutamide when compared to patients without these mutations. We conclude that Wnt-pathway mutations might decrease the effectiveness of abiraterone and enzalutamide, and we propose that the Wnt pathway might be a good therapeutic target for these patients, in order to potentially reverse or prolong resistance to abiraterone and enzalutamide in men with Wnt mutations.
Authors: Maha Hussain; Karim Fizazi; Fred Saad; Per Rathenborg; Neal Shore; Ubirajara Ferreira; Petro Ivashchenko; Eren Demirhan; Katharina Modelska; Andrew Krivoshik; Cora N Sternberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A J Armstrong; E S Antonarakis; M-E Taplin; W K Kelly; H Beltran; K Fizazi; W L Dahut; N Shore; S Slovin; D George; M A Carducci; P Corn; D Danila; R Dreicer; E Heath; D Rathkopf; G Liu; D Nanus; M Stein; M R Smith; C Sternberg; G Wilding; P S Nelson; S Halabi; P Kantoff; N W Clarke; C P Evans; A Heidenreich; N Mottet; M Gleave; M J Morris; H I Scher Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Charles J Ryan; Matthew R Smith; Johann S de Bono; Arturo Molina; Christopher J Logothetis; Paul de Souza; Karim Fizazi; Paul Mainwaring; Josep M Piulats; Siobhan Ng; Joan Carles; Peter F A Mulders; Ethan Basch; Eric J Small; Fred Saad; Dirk Schrijvers; Hendrik Van Poppel; Som D Mukherjee; Henrik Suttmann; Winald R Gerritsen; Thomas W Flaig; Daniel J George; Evan Y Yu; Eleni Efstathiou; Allan Pantuck; Eric Winquist; Celestia S Higano; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Youn Park; Thian Kheoh; Thomas Griffin; Howard I Scher; Dana E Rathkopf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-12-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L Wang; S M Dehm; D W Hillman; H Sicotte; W Tan; M Gormley; V Bhargava; R Jimenez; F Xie; P Yin; S Qin; F Quevedo; B A Costello; H C Pitot; T Ho; A H Bryce; Z Ye; Y Li; P Eiken; P T Vedell; P Barman; B P McMenomy; T D Atwell; R E Carlson; M Ellingson; B W Eckloff; R Qin; F Ou; S N Hart; H Huang; J Jen; E D Wieben; K R Kalari; R M Weinshilboum; L Wang; M Kohli Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Karim Fizazi; NamPhuong Tran; Luis Fein; Nobuaki Matsubara; Alfredo Rodriguez-Antolin; Boris Y Alekseev; Mustafa Özgüroğlu; Dingwei Ye; Susan Feyerabend; Andrew Protheroe; Peter De Porre; Thian Kheoh; Youn C Park; Mary B Todd; Kim N Chi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dan Robinson; Eliezer M Van Allen; Yi-Mi Wu; Nikolaus Schultz; Robert J Lonigro; Juan-Miguel Mosquera; Bruce Montgomery; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Colin C Pritchard; Gerhardt Attard; Himisha Beltran; Wassim Abida; Robert K Bradley; Jake Vinson; Xuhong Cao; Pankaj Vats; Lakshmi P Kunju; Maha Hussain; Felix Y Feng; Scott A Tomlins; Kathleen A Cooney; David C Smith; Christine Brennan; Javed Siddiqui; Rohit Mehra; Yu Chen; Dana E Rathkopf; Michael J Morris; Stephen B Solomon; Jeremy C Durack; Victor E Reuter; Anuradha Gopalan; Jianjiong Gao; Massimo Loda; Rosina T Lis; Michaela Bowden; Stephen P Balk; Glenn Gaviola; Carrie Sougnez; Manaswi Gupta; Evan Y Yu; Elahe A Mostaghel; Heather H Cheng; Hyojeong Mulcahy; Lawrence D True; Stephen R Plymate; Heidi Dvinge; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Penny Flohr; Susana Miranda; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Nina Tunariu; Joaquin Mateo; Raquel Perez-Lopez; Francesca Demichelis; Brian D Robinson; Marc Schiffman; David M Nanus; Scott T Tagawa; Alexandros Sigaras; Kenneth W Eng; Olivier Elemento; Andrea Sboner; Elisabeth I Heath; Howard I Scher; Kenneth J Pienta; Philip Kantoff; Johann S de Bono; Mark A Rubin; Peter S Nelson; Levi A Garraway; Charles L Sawyers; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Cell Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Soo Jin Jung; Sangtaek Oh; Geun Taek Lee; Jaeil Chung; Kweonsik Min; Jangho Yoon; Wansuk Kim; Dong Soo Ryu; Isaac Yi Kim; Dong Il Kang Journal: World J Mens Health Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 5.400
Authors: Mari Nakazawa; Mike Fang; Catherine H Marshall; Tamara L Lotan; Pedro Isaacsson Velho; Emmanuel S Antonarakis Journal: Prostate Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Fanying Tang; Duo Xu; Shangqian Wang; Chen Khuan Wong; Alexander Martinez-Fundichely; Cindy J Lee; Sandra Cohen; Jane Park; Corinne E Hill; Kenneth Eng; Rohan Bareja; Teng Han; Eric Minwei Liu; Ann Palladino; Wei Di; Dong Gao; Wassim Abida; Shaham Beg; Loredana Puca; Maximiliano Meneses; Elisa de Stanchina; Michael F Berger; Anuradha Gopalan; Lukas E Dow; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Himisha Beltran; Cora N Sternberg; Ping Chi; Howard I Scher; Andrea Sboner; Yu Chen; Ekta Khurana Journal: Science Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 63.714
Authors: Jan Matthijs Moll; Wilma J Teubel; Sigrun E Erkens; Ashraf Jozefzoon-Agai; Natasja F Dits; Angelique van Rijswijk; Guido W Jenster; Wytske M van Weerden Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Fen Ma; Seiji Arai; Keshan Wang; Carla Calagua; Amanda R Yuan; Larysa Poluben; Zhongkai Gu; Joshua W Russo; David J Einstein; Huihui Ye; Meng Xiao He; Yu Liu; Eliezer Van Allen; Adam G Sowalsky; Manoj K Bhasin; Xin Yuan; Steven P Balk Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Xiangnan Guan; Duanchen Sun; Eric Lu; Joshua A Urrutia; Robert Evan Reiter; Matthew Rettig; Christopher P Evans; Primo Lara; Martin Gleave; Tomasz M Beer; George V Thomas; Jiaoti Huang; Rahul R Aggarwal; David A Quigley; Adam Foye; William S Chen; Jack Youngren; Alana S Weinstein; Joshua M Stuart; Felix Y Feng; Eric J Small; Zheng Xia; Joshi J Alumkal Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Megan Crumbaker; Eva K F Chan; Tingting Gong; Niall Corcoran; Weerachai Jaratlerdsiri; Ruth J Lyons; Anne-Maree Haynes; Anna A Kulidjian; Anton M F Kalsbeek; Desiree C Petersen; Phillip D Stricker; Christina A M Jamieson; Peter I Croucher; Christopher M Hovens; Anthony M Joshua; Vanessa M Hayes Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 6.639