Literature DB >> 3117620

The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XX. Comparison of genotype-environment interaction in viability between a northern and a southern population.

T Takano1, S Kusakabe, T Mukai.   

Abstract

In order to examine the operation of diversifying selection as the maintenance mechanism of excessive additive genetic variance for viability in southern populations in comparison with northern populations of Drosophila melanogaster, two sets of experiments were conducted using second chromosomes extracted from the Ogasawara population (a southern population in Japan) and from the Aomori population (a northern population in Japan). Chromosomal homozygote and heterozygote viabilities were estimated in eight kinds of artificially produced breeding environments. The main findings in the present investigation are as follows: (1) Significant genotype-environment interaction was observed using chromosomes extracted from the Ogasawara population. Indeed, the estimate of the genotype-environment interaction variance for heterozygotes was significantly larger than that of the genotypic variance. On the other hand, when chromosomes sampled from the Aomori population were examined, that interaction variance was significant only for homozygotes and its value was no more than one quarter of that for the chromosomes from the Ogasawara population. (2) The average genetic correlation between any two viabilities of the same lines estimated in the eight kinds of breeding environments for the chromosomes sampled from the Ogasawara population was smaller than that for the chromosomes from the Aomori population both in homozygotes and in heterozygotes, especially in the latter. (3) The stability of heterozygotes over homozygotes against fluctuations of environmental conditions was seen in the chromosomes from the Ogasawara population, but not from the Aomori population. (4) From the excessive genotype-environment interaction variance compared with the genotypic variance in heterozygotes, it was suggested for the chromosomes from the Ogasawara population that the reversal of viability order between homozygotes took place in some environments at the locus level. On the basis of these findings, it is strongly suggested that diversifying selection is operating in a southern population of D. melanogaster on some of the viability polygenes which are probably located outside the structural loci, and the excessive additive genetic variance of viability in southern populations is maintained by this type of selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3117620      PMCID: PMC1203201     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  11 in total

1.  Marginal overdominance in Drosophila.

Authors:  C Wills
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Reexamination of diversifying selection of polymorphic allozyme genes by using population cages in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Yamazaki; S Kusakabe; H Tachida; M Ichinose; H Yoshimaru; Y Matsuo; T Mukai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genetics of Natural Populations. Xxiv. Developmental Homeostasis in Natural Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky; H Levene
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1955-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetic response to environmental heterogeneity.

Authors:  J F McDonald; F J Ayala
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Evolutionary rate at the molecular level.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Xvii. a Population Carrying Genetic Variability Explicable by the Classical Hypothesis.

Authors:  S Kusakabe; T Mukai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Xv. Nature of Developmental Homeostasis for Viability.

Authors:  T Mukai; S I Chigusa; S Kusakabe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The genetic variance for viability and its components in a local population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Mukai; R A Cardellino; T K Watanabe; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Spontaneous mutation rates at enzyme loci in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Mukai; C C Cockerham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Selection of viability at loci controlling protein polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster is very weak at most.

Authors:  T Mukai; H Tachida; M Ichinose
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  8 in total

1.  Deleterious mutations and the genetic variance of male fitness components in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  John K Kelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Interlocus nonrandom association of polymorphisms in Drosophila chemoreceptor genes.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu; Akira Kawabe; Nobuyuki Inomata; Noriko Nanba; Rumi Kondo; Yutaka Inoue; Masanobu Itoh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The effect of antagonistic pleiotropy on the estimation of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.

Authors:  B Fernández; A García-Dorado; A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Rates of spontaneous mutation.

Authors:  J W Drake; B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Polymorphism for the number of tandemly multiplicated glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Takano; S Kusakabe; A Koga; T Mukai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Systems genomics of metabolic phenotypes in wild-type Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Laura K Reed; Kevin Lee; Zhi Zhang; Lubna Rashid; Amy Poe; Benjamin Hsieh; Nigel Deighton; Norm Glassbrook; Rolf Bodmer; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Mitonuclear Epistasis for Development Time and Its Modification by Diet in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jim A Mossman; Leann M Biancani; Chen-Tseh Zhu; David M Rand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Effects of larval crowding on quantitative variation for development time and viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Barbara Horváth; Alex T Kalinka
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.