Literature DB >> 1205124

Marginal overdominance in Drosophila.

C Wills.   

Abstract

A reanalysis of Drosophila viability data was undertaken to determine the role of genotype-environment interactions in the maintenance of polymorphism. Between-replicate variances of viabilities in chromosomal homozygotes and heterozygotes with the same mean fitnesses were compared, with the expectation that if the heterozygote variance were on the average greater, conditional overdominance would be prevalent; if it were less, partial dominance would be prevalent; and if it were the same, marginal overdominance of the type considered by Wallace (1968) would be the prevalent type of variation. In fact, heterozygote variance was slightly less. The work of Dempster (1955) and of Gillespie and Langley (1974) is cited to show that this situation can still lead to balanced polymorphisms. Their general model for genetic variation in populations, consistent with the viability data, is reinforced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1205124      PMCID: PMC1213382     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  8 in total

1.  Further evidence for selective differences between isoalleles in Drosophila.

Authors:  C Wills; J Phelps; R Ferguson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  GENETICS OF NATURAL POPULATIONS. XXXIV. ADAPTIVE NORM, GENETIC LOAD AND GENETIC ELITE IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.

Authors:  T DOBZHANSKY; B SPASSKY
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1963-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetics of Natural Populations. Xxiv. Developmental Homeostasis in Natural Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky; H Levene
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1955-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Further Data on the Overdominance of Induced Mutations.

Authors:  B Wallace
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1963-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genetics of Natural Populations. Xxiii. Biological Role of Deleterious Recessives in Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky; O Pavlovsky; B Spassky; N Spassky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1955-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A general model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations.

Authors:  J H Gillespie; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XI. Genetic variability in a local population.

Authors:  T Mukai; O Yamaguchi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The mutational load in two natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  C Wills
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 4.562

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Xix. Genotype-Environment Interaction in Viability.

Authors:  H Tachida; T Mukai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XX. Comparison of genotype-environment interaction in viability between a northern and a southern population.

Authors:  T Takano; S Kusakabe; T Mukai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genomics of Natural Populations: How Differentially Expressed Genes Shape the Evolution of Chromosomal Inversions in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Zachary L Fuller; Gwilym D Haynes; Stephen Richards; Stephen W Schaeffer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.562

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.