Literature DB >> 15377795

Interlocus nonrandom association of polymorphisms in Drosophila chemoreceptor genes.

Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu1, Akira Kawabe, Nobuyuki Inomata, Noriko Nanba, Rumi Kondo, Yutaka Inoue, Masanobu Itoh.   

Abstract

Some forms of multilocus selection with epistasis, such as truncation selection, can effectively reduce the mutation load [Kondrashov, A. S. (1988) Nature 336, 435-440]. Many quantitative characters, including complex genetic diseases, are likely to be subject to these types of selection. However, direct measurement of selection in natural populations is difficult and the effect of epistasis on within-species variations remains unclear. Epistatic interaction in the fitness effect can generate linkage disequilibrium (LD). Therefore, we may detect the action of natural selection from its amount and pattern. Here, we report a large number of interlocus nonrandom associations between polymorphisms in 98 Drosophila chemoreceptor genes. LD was examined in two fly samples collected at the same location, but in different seasons. The amount of LD was much larger in the spring sample than in the autumn one. The between-sample difference was much more striking for the replacement polymorphisms than for the silent polymorphisms. This difference between the replacement and silent polymorphisms could not be attributed to differences in the mean marker distances. We also found a significant excess of associations between one frequent and one less common allele for the replacement polymorphisms, but not for the silent polymorphisms. It is unlikely that a simple seasonal bottleneck could explain all these differences in the scale of LD between the samples and between the replacement and silent polymorphisms. Natural selection is suggested to play a significant role in shaping the pattern of LD observed in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15377795      PMCID: PMC521131          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0401782101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

Review 1.  Population choice in mapping genes for complex diseases.

Authors:  A F Wright; A D Carothers; M Pirastu
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  A chemosensory gene family encoding candidate gustatory and olfactory receptors in Drosophila.

Authors:  K Scott; R Brady; A Cravchik; P Morozov; A Rzhetsky; C Zuker; R Axel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Linkage disequilibrium: what history has to tell us.

Authors:  Magnus Nordborg; Simon Tavaré
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Distribution of nonrandom associations between pairs of protein loci along the third chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Carlos Zapata; Concepción Núñez; Teresa Velasco
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Role of very slightly deleterious mutations in molecular evolution and polymorphism.

Authors:  T Ohta
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Genetic drift and estimation of effective population size.

Authors:  M Nei; F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Molecular and phenotypic variation of the white locus region in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  N Miyashita; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  An experimental on recombination load in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  The direction of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  C H Langley; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Molecular evolution of the insect chemoreceptor gene superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Hugh M Robertson; Coral G Warr; John R Carlson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

1.  Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Charles H Langley; Kristian Stevens; Charis Cardeno; Yuh Chwen G Lee; Daniel R Schrider; John E Pool; Sasha A Langley; Charlyn Suarez; Russell B Corbett-Detig; Bryan Kolaczkowski; Shu Fang; Phillip M Nista; Alisha K Holloway; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Yun S Song; Matthew W Hahn; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sporadic, Global Linkage Disequilibrium Between Unlinked Segregating Sites.

Authors:  Daniel A Skelly; Paul M Magwene; Eric A Stone
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A new test for detecting ongoing selection.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Inomata; Masanobu Itoh; Rumi Kondo; Miki Ohshima; Yutaka Inoue; Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  A high-frequency null mutant of an odorant-binding protein gene, Obp57e, in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Aya Takahashi; Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Genome-wide scans for loci under selection in humans.

Authors:  James Ronald; Joshua M Akey
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.639

6.  Massive habitat-specific genomic response in D. melanogaster populations during experimental evolution in hot and cold environments.

Authors:  Ray Tobler; Susanne U Franssen; Robert Kofler; Pablo Orozco-Terwengel; Viola Nolte; Joachim Hermisson; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Long range linkage disequilibrium across the human genome.

Authors:  Evan Koch; Mickey Ristroph; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.