Literature DB >> 31175460

One-Stop MRI and MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: an expedited pathway for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Alessandro Tafuri1,2, Akbar N Ashrafi1, Suzanne Palmer3, Aliasger Shakir1, Giovanni E Cacciamani1, Atsuko Iwata1, Tsuyoshi Iwata1, Jie Cai1, Akash Sali1,4, Chhavi Gupta1,4, Luis G Medina1, Mariana C Stern1,5, Vinay Duddalwar3, Manju Aron4, Inderbir S Gill1, Andre Abreu6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of an expedited One-Stop prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic pathway. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 370 consecutive patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy (MRI/TRUS-PBx) from our institutional review board-approved database. Patients were divided according to diagnostic pathway: One-Stop (n = 74), with mpMRI and same-day PBx, or Standard (n = 296), with mpMRI followed by a second visit for PBx. mpMRIs were performed and interpreted according to Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS v2). Grade group ≥ 2 PCa defined clinically significant PCa (csPCa). Statistical significance was considered when p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Age (66 vs 66 years, p = 0.59) and PSA density (0.1 vs 0.1 ng/mL2, p = 0.26) were not different between One-Stop vs Standard pathway, respectively. One-Stop patients lived further away from the hospital than Standard patients (163 vs 31 km; p < 0.01), and experienced shorter time from mpMRI to PBx (0 vs 7 days; p < 0.01). The number (p = 0.56) and distribution of PI-RADS lesions (p = 0.67) were not different between the groups. All procedures were completed successfully with similar perioperative complications rate (p = 0.24). For patients with PI-RADS 3-5 lesions, the csPCa detection rate (49% vs 41%, p = 0.55) was similar for One-Stop vs Standard, respectively. The negative predictive value of mpMRI (PI-RADS 1-2) for csPCa was 78% for One-Stop vs 83% for Standard (p = 0.99). On multivariate analysis, age, prostate volume and PI-RADS score (p < 0.01), but not diagnostic pathway, predicted csPCa detection.
CONCLUSION: A One-Stop PCa diagnostic pathway is feasible, safe, and provides similar outcomes in a shorter time compared to the Standard two-visit diagnostic pathway.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; MRI fusion biopsy; One-Stop; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31175460      PMCID: PMC6898759          DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02835-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  23 in total

1.  Complications following prostate needle biopsy requiring hospital admission or emergency department visits - experience from 1000 consecutive cases.

Authors:  G Igor Pinkhasov; Yu-Kuan Lin; Ricardo Palmerola; Paul Smith; Frank Mahon; Matthew G Kaag; J Edward Dagen; Lewis E Harpster; Carl T Reese; Jay D Raman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Evaluating the effect of time from prostate cancer diagnosis to radical prostatectomy on cancer control: Can surgery be postponed safely?

Authors:  Nicola Fossati; Martina Sofia Rossi; Vito Cucchiara; Giorgio Gandaglia; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Marco Moschini; Nazareno Suardi; Federico Dehò; Francesco Montorsi; Riccardo Schiavina; Alexandre Mottrie; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 3.  Sepsis and 'superbugs': should we favour the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Jeremy P Grummet; Mahesha Weerakoon; Sean Huang; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Mark Frydenberg; Daniel A Moon; Mary O'Reilly; Declan Murphy
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  An Update of the American Urological Association White Paper on the Prevention and Treatment of the More Common Complications Related to Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Behfar Ehdaie; Stacy Loeb; Maxwell V Meng; Jay D Raman; Vanessa Spears; Sean P Stroup
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Time between diagnosis and surgical treatment on pathological and clinical outcomes in prostate cancer: does it matter?

Authors:  Mariana Andozia Morini; Roberto Lodeiro Muller; Paulo César Barbosa de Castro Junior; Rafael José de Souza; Eliney Ferreira Faria
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Lars Egevad; Mahul B Amin; Brett Delahunt; John R Srigley; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Implementation of a Tele-urology Program for Outpatient Hematuria Referrals: Initial Results and Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Ilan J Safir; Salil Gabale; Samuel A David; Jonathan H Huang; Robert S Gerhard; Jeffrey Pearl; Charles A Lorentz; James Baumgardner; Christopher P Filson; Muta M Issa
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Marco Borghesi; Hashim Ahmed; Robert Nam; Edward Schaeffer; Riccardo Schiavina; Samir Taneja; Wolfgang Weidner; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Antti S Rannikko; Marcelo Borghi; Valeria Panebianco; Lance A Mynderse; Markku H Vaarala; Alberto Briganti; Lars Budäus; Giles Hellawell; Richard G Hindley; Monique J Roobol; Scott Eggener; Maneesh Ghei; Arnauld Villers; Franck Bladou; Geert M Villeirs; Jaspal Virdi; Silvan Boxler; Grégoire Robert; Paras B Singh; Wulphert Venderink; Boris A Hadaschik; Alain Ruffion; Jim C Hu; Daniel Margolis; Sébastien Crouzet; Laurence Klotz; Samir S Taneja; Peter Pinto; Inderbir Gill; Clare Allen; Francesco Giganti; Alex Freeman; Stephen Morris; Shonit Punwani; Norman R Williams; Chris Brew-Graves; Jonathan Deeks; Yemisi Takwoingi; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 176.079

Review 10.  Depression and anxiety in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates.

Authors:  Sam Watts; Geraldine Leydon; Brian Birch; Philip Prescott; Lily Lai; Susan Eardley; George Lewith
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  4 in total

1.  Role of MRI for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard C Wu; Amir H Lebastchi; Boris A Hadaschik; Mark Emberton; Caroline Moore; Pilar Laguna; Jurgen J Fütterer; Arvin K George
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Techniques and Outcomes of MRI-TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Masatomo Kaneko; Dordaneh Sugano; Amir H Lebastchi; Vinay Duddalwar; Jamal Nabhani; Christopher Haiman; Inderbir S Gill; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Andre Luis Abreu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Comparative Effectiveness of Techniques in Targeted Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Dordaneh Sugano; Masatomo Kaneko; Wesley Yip; Amir H Lebastchi; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Andre Luis Abreu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Interventions to improve early cancer diagnosis of symptomatic individuals: a scoping review.

Authors:  George N Okoli; Otto L T Lam; Viraj K Reddy; Leslie Copstein; Nicole Askin; Anubha Prashad; Jennifer Stiff; Satya Rashi Khare; Robyn Leonard; Wasifa Zarin; Andrea C Tricco; Ahmed M Abou-Setta
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.