Literature DB >> 27986374

Evaluating the effect of time from prostate cancer diagnosis to radical prostatectomy on cancer control: Can surgery be postponed safely?

Nicola Fossati1, Martina Sofia Rossi2, Vito Cucchiara3, Giorgio Gandaglia3, Paolo Dell'Oglio3, Marco Moschini3, Nazareno Suardi3, Federico Dehò3, Francesco Montorsi3, Riccardo Schiavina2, Alexandre Mottrie4, Alberto Briganti3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the prognostic role of treatment delay in patients affected by prostate cancer (PCa).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 2,653 patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) at a single institution between 2006 and 2011. The evaluated outcomes were biochemical recurrence (BCR) and clinical recurrence (CR). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to test the association between time from diagnosis to RP and oncological outcomes. Nonparametric curve fitting methods were used to graphically explore the relationship between time from diagnosis to RP and oncological outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were repeated in the subgroups of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients.
RESULTS: At median follow-up of 56 months (interquartile range: 26, 92), 283 patients experienced BCR, and 84 patients developed CR. Median time from PCa diagnosis to surgery was 2.8 months (interquartile range: 1.6, 4.7). At multivariable Cox regression analysis, time from biopsy to RP was significantly associated with an increased risk of BCR (hazard ratio = 1.02, P = 0.0005) and CR (hazard ratio = 1.03, P = 0.0002). Using Nonparametric curve fitting methods, a significant increased risk of BCR and CR after approximately 18 months was observed. However, when sensitivity analyses were repeated according to risk groups, this effect was maintained in high-risk patients only, and such time interval was reduced to 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the overall trend on higher rate of cancer relapse after RP, the effect of treatment delay from biopsy to RP was significantly evident in high-risk patients only. Even in high-risk patients surgical treatment can be postponed safely, but not beyond the 12-month landmark.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer recurrence; Prostatic neoplasms; Treatment delay

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27986374     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  18 in total

1.  Comparative Analysis of Biopsy Upgrading in Four Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohorts.

Authors:  Lurdes Y T Inoue; Daniel W Lin; Lisa F Newcomb; Amy S Leonardson; Donna Ankerst; Roman Gulati; H Ballentine Carter; Bruce J Trock; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg; Janet E Cowan; Laurence H Klotz; Alexandre Mamedov; David F Penson; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  One-Stop MRI and MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: an expedited pathway for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Alessandro Tafuri; Akbar N Ashrafi; Suzanne Palmer; Aliasger Shakir; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Atsuko Iwata; Tsuyoshi Iwata; Jie Cai; Akash Sali; Chhavi Gupta; Luis G Medina; Mariana C Stern; Vinay Duddalwar; Manju Aron; Inderbir S Gill; Andre Abreu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Impact of waiting time on hepatocellular carcinoma progression in patients undergoing curative tumour ablation.

Authors:  Daniel Yuxuan Ong; Zhong Yun Lee; Uei Pua
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

4.  Safety first: evidence for delay of radical prostatectomy without use of androgen deprivation therapy during COVID-19.

Authors:  Xuan Rui Sean Ong; Benjamin Condon; Dominic Bagguley; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Arun Azad; Declan Murphy
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 5.  Where do urologists stand in the era of novel coronavirus-2019 disease.

Authors:  Thomas Hughes; Hui Ching Ho; Shahrokh F Shariat; Bhaskar Kumar Somani
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.309

6.  The effect of time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy on adverse pathologic outcomes.

Authors:  Premal Patel; Ryan Sun; Benjamin Shiff; Kiril Trpkov; Geoffrey Thomas Gotto
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-03-06

7.  Considerations in the Triage of Urologic Surgeries During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Kristian D Stensland; Todd M Morgan; Alireza Moinzadeh; Cheryl T Lee; Alberto Briganti; James W F Catto; David Canes
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Excessive waitlists and delays to treatment with low-dose-rate brachytherapy predict an increased risk of recurrence and metastases in intermediate-risk prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Rutvij A Khanolkar; Harvey Quon; Kundan Thind; Michael Sia; Michael Roumeliotis; Siraj Husain; Philip McGeachy; Tyler Meyer; Kevin Martell
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01

Review 9.  Impact of COVID-19 on Prostate Cancer Management: Guidelines for Urologists.

Authors:  Zachary Dovey; Nihal Mohamed; Yasmine Gharib; Parita Ratnani; Nada Hammouda; Sujit S Nair; Dimple Chakravarty; Stanislaw Sobotka; Anna Lantz; Peter Wiklund; Natasha Kyprianou; Ash Tewari
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-06-16

10.  Oncologic impact of delaying radical prostatectomy in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ekaterina Laukhtina; Reza Sari Motlagh; Keiichiro Mori; Fahad Quhal; Victor M Schuettfort; Hadi Mostafaei; Satoshi Katayama; Nico C Grossmann; Guillaume Ploussard; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Mohammad Abufaraj; Dmitry Enikeev; Benjamin Pradere; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.