Literature DB >> 27450940

Implementation of a Tele-urology Program for Outpatient Hematuria Referrals: Initial Results and Patient Satisfaction.

Ilan J Safir1, Salil Gabale2, Samuel A David2, Jonathan H Huang2, Robert S Gerhard2, Jeffrey Pearl2, Charles A Lorentz2, James Baumgardner3, Christopher P Filson2, Muta M Issa2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report on results from a new tele-urology pathway for managing hematuria consults, including a survey of patient attitudes and satisfaction with such a program. Recent guideline changes have relaxed the definition of microscopic hematuria and may have significantly increased the number of hematuria evaluations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients referred to the Atlanta Veterans Administration Medical Center with hematuria were scheduled for a tele-urology clinic encounter utilizing a telephone call to obtain hematuria-related clinical information via a standardized algorithm. At subsequent cystoscopy, patients were evaluated with a 29-question survey regarding overall acceptance and satisfaction of the clinic (8 questions) and impact factors (21 questions).
RESULTS: One hundred fifty veterans participated in the survey. Median time from consult request to appointment was 12 days and thereafter to cystoscopy was 16 days. Patients reported high acceptance and overall satisfaction with telephone evaluation; mean scores exceeded 9 out of 10 for overall satisfaction, efficiency, convenience, friendliness, care quality, understandability, privacy, and professionalism. When presented with a choice, nearly all patients (98%) preferred telephone-based encounters to face-to-face clinic visits. Underlying negative factors responsible for patients' preferences included transportation-related issues (97%) and logistical clinic issues (65%). Ninety-seven percent of patients reported high-quality evaluation.
CONCLUSION: Patients report high acceptance and satisfaction with telephone clinics as a mechanism for expedited hematuria evaluation, primarily due to avoiding barriers related to transportation and clinical operations, as well as a perceived high quality of evaluation. Telephone appointments have potential to positively impact healthcare access and productivity.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27450940     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

1.  One-Stop MRI and MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: an expedited pathway for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Alessandro Tafuri; Akbar N Ashrafi; Suzanne Palmer; Aliasger Shakir; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Atsuko Iwata; Tsuyoshi Iwata; Jie Cai; Akash Sali; Chhavi Gupta; Luis G Medina; Mariana C Stern; Vinay Duddalwar; Manju Aron; Inderbir S Gill; Andre Abreu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Evaluating the Effectiveness, Efficiency and Safety of Telemedicine for Urological Care in the Male Prisoner Population.

Authors:  Brenton G Sherwood; Yu Han; Kenneth G Nepple; Bradley A Erickson
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2017-01-08

3.  Are telephone consultations the future of the NHS? The outcomes and experiences of an NHS urological service in moving to telemedicine.

Authors:  Agathoklis Efthymiadis; Edward Jm Hart; Alexandra M Guy; Rebecca Harry; Tharani Mahesan; Wissam Abou Chedid; Santiago Uribe-Lewis; Matthew Ja Perry
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-03

4.  Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Enrico Checcucci; Alessandro Crestani; Alberto Abrate; Francesco Esperto; Nicola Pavan; Cosimo De Nunzio; Antonio Galfano; Gianluca Giannarini; Andrea Gregori; Giovanni Liguori; Riccardo Bartoletti; Francesco Porpiglia; Roberto Mario Scarpa; Alchiede Simonato; Carlo Trombetta; Andrea Tubaro; Vincenzo Ficarra
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Implementing telemedicine for the management of benign urologic conditions: a single centre experience in Italy.

Authors:  Enrico Checcucci; Stefano De Luca; Paolo Alessio; Paolo Verri; Stefano Granato; Sabrina De Cillis; Daniele Amparore; Michele Sica; Federico Piramide; Alberto Piana; Gabriele Volpi; Matteo Manfredi; Gabriella Balestra; Riccardo Autorino; Cristian Fiori; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  [COVID-19 in urology : Influence of the pandemic on telemedicine, education and surgery].

Authors:  D Pfister; M Schmautz; P Paffenholz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Telemedicine and Telehealth in Urology-What Do the 'Patients' Think About It?

Authors:  Nithesh Naik; B M Zeeshan Hameed; Sanjana Ganesh Nayak; Anshita Gera; Shreyas Raghavan Nandyal; Dasharathraj K Shetty; Milap Shah; Sufyan Ibrahim; Aniket Naik; Nagaraj Kamath; Delaram Mahdaviamiri; Kenisha Kevin D'costa; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Piotr Chlosta; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-15

8.  Adapting Urology Residency Training in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Young Suk Kwon; Alexandra L Tabakin; Hiren V Patel; Jeffrey R Backstrand; Thomas L Jang; Isaac Y Kim; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Strategic use of telemedicine for restarting urological outpatient services during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Devanshu Bansal; Samit Chaturvedi; Anant Kumar
Journal:  Afr J Urol       Date:  2020-11-04

Review 10.  Clinical implications of telemedicine for providers and patients.

Authors:  William T Berg; Marc Goldstein; Alexis P Melnick; Zev Rosenwaks
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.490

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.