Literature DB >> 31172175

Effect of different doses of supervised exercise on food intake, metabolism, and non-exercise physical activity: The E-MECHANIC randomized controlled trial.

Corby K Martin1, William D Johnson1, Candice A Myers1, John W Apolzan1, Conrad P Earnest2, Diana M Thomas3, Jennifer C Rood1, Neil M Johannsen1,4, Catrine Tudor-Locke1,5, Melissa Harris1, Daniel S Hsia1, Timothy S Church1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exercise is recommended for weight management, yet exercise produces less weight loss than expected, which is called weight compensation. The mechanisms for weight compensation are unclear.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the mechanisms responsible for compensation.
METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial conducted at an academic research center, adults (n = 198) with overweight or obesity were randomized for 24 wk to a no-exercise control group or 1 of 2 supervised exercise groups: 8 kcal/kg of body weight/wk (KKW) or 20 KKW. Outcome assessment occurred at weeks 0 and 24. Energy intake, activity, and resting metabolic rate (RMR) were measured with doubly labeled water (DLW; with and without adjustments for change in RMR), armband accelerometers, and indirect calorimetry, respectively. Appetite and compensatory health beliefs were measured by self-report.
RESULTS: A per-protocol analysis included 171 participants (72.5% women; mean ± SD baseline body mass index: 31.5 ± 4.7 kg/m2). Significant (P < 0.01) compensation occurred in the 8 KKW (mean: 1.5 kg; 95% CI: 0.9, 2.2 kg) and 20 KKW (mean: 2.7 kg; 95% CI: 2.0, 3.5 kg) groups, and compensation differed significantly between the exercise groups (P = 0.01). Energy intake by adjusted DLW increased significantly (P < 0.05) in the 8 KKW (mean: 90.7 kcal/d; 95% CI: 35.1, 146.4 kcal/d) and 20 KKW (mean: 123.6 kcal/d; 95% CI: 64.5, 182.7 kcal/d) groups compared with control (mean: -2.3 kcal/d; 95% CI: -58.0, 53.5 kcal/d). Results were similar without DLW adjustment. RMR and physical activity (excluding structured exercise) did not differentially change among the 3 groups. Participants with higher compared with lower compensation reported increased appetite ratings and beliefs that healthy behaviors can compensate for unhealthy behaviors. Furthermore, they increased craving for sweet foods, increased sleep disturbance, and had worsening bodily pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Compensation resulted from increased energy intake and concomitant increases in appetite, which can be treated with dietary or pharmacological interventions. Compensation was not due to activity or metabolic changes. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01264406.
Copyright © American Society for Nutrition 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Food Craving Inventory; SF-36; compensation; compensatory health beliefs; exercise; food intake; physical activity; weight loss

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31172175      PMCID: PMC6735935          DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  36 in total

Review 1.  Markers of the validity of reported energy intake.

Authors:  M Barbara E Livingstone; Alison E Black
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 2.  Physical activity and resting metabolic rate.

Authors:  John R Speakman; Colin Selman
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.297

3.  Reproducibility, power and validity of visual analogue scales in assessment of appetite sensations in single test meal studies.

Authors:  A Flint; A Raben; J E Blundell; A Astrup
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-01

4.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Physical activity, total and regional obesity: dose-response considerations.

Authors:  R Ross; I Janssen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Effects of a 16-month randomized controlled exercise trial on body weight and composition in young, overweight men and women: the Midwest Exercise Trial.

Authors:  Joseph E Donnelly; James O Hill; Dennis J Jacobsen; Jeffrey Potteiger; Debra K Sullivan; Susan L Johnson; Kate Heelan; Mary Hise; Paul V Fennessey; Bakary Sonko; Teresa Sharp; John M Jakicic; Steven N Blair; Zung V Tran; Matthew Mayo; Cheryl Gibson; Richard A Washburn
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-06-09

7.  Development and validation of the food-craving inventory.

Authors:  Marney A White; Brooke L Whisenhunt; Donald A Williamson; Frank L Greenway; Richard G Netemeyer
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2002-02

8.  Agreement between weekly vs. daily assessment of appetite.

Authors:  Leslie G Womble; Thomas A Wadden; Julie M Chandler; Allison R Martin
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 9.  Cross talk between physical activity and appetite control: does physical activity stimulate appetite?

Authors:  J E Blundell; R J Stubbs; D A Hughes; S Whybrow; N A King
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.297

10.  Relationship between temperament, nonresting energy expenditure, body composition, and physical activity in girls.

Authors:  S E Anderson; L G Bandini; W H Dietz; A Must
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2004-02
View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  What Should I Eat and Why? The Environmental, Genetic, and Behavioral Determinants of Food Choice: Summary from a Pennington Scientific Symposium.

Authors:  Emily Qualls-Creekmore; Kara L Marlatt; Esther Aarts; Annadora Bruce-Keller; Tim S Church; Karine Clément; Jennifer O Fisher; Penny Gordon-Larsen; Christopher D Morrison; Helen E Raybould; Donna H Ryan; Philip R Schauer; Alan C Spector; Maartje S Spetter; Garret D Stuber; Hans-Rudolf Berthoud; Eric Ravussin
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  Adaptations to exercise in compensators and noncompensators in the E-MECHANIC Trial.

Authors:  S Nicole Fearnbach; Neil M Johannsen; Candice A Myers; John W Apolzan; William D Johnson; Conrad P Earnest; Jennifer C Rood; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Melissa N Harris; Timothy S Church; Corby K Martin
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-07-16

3.  Is physical activity a risk or protective factor for subsequent dietary lapses among behavioral weight loss participants?

Authors:  Rebecca J Crochiere; Stephanie G Kerrigan; Elizabeth W Lampe; Stephanie M Manasse; Ross D Crosby; Meghan L Butryn; Evan M Forman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Effect of Aerobic Exercise-induced Weight Loss on the Components of Daily Energy Expenditure.

Authors:  Nicholas T Broskey; Corby K Martin; Jeffrey H Burton; Timothy S Church; Eric Ravussin; Leanne M Redman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2021-10-01

5.  Metabolic adaptation after combined resistance and aerobic exercise training in older women.

Authors:  Catia Martins; Barbara Gower; Gary R Hunter
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 9.298

6.  The Impact of Exercise and Cumulative Physical Activity on Energy Intake and Diet Quality in Adults Enrolled in The Midwest Exercise Trial for The Prevention of Weight Regain.

Authors:  Lauren T Ptomey; Robert N Montgomery; Anna M Gorczyca; Amanda N Szabo-Reed; Debra K Sullivan; Mary Hastert; Rachel Ns Foster; Richard A Washburn; Joseph E Donnelly
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.125

7.  Baseline Habitual Physical Activity Predicts Weight Loss, Weight Compensation, and Energy Intake During Aerobic Exercise.

Authors:  Christoph Höchsmann; James L Dorling; John W Apolzan; Neil M Johannsen; Daniel S Hsia; Corby K Martin
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Increased Energy Intake After Pregnancy Determines Postpartum Weight Retention in Women With Obesity.

Authors:  Jasper Most; Abby D Altazan; Marshall St Amant; Robbie A Beyl; Eric Ravussin; Leanne M Redman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 9.  Examining the Role of Exercise Timing in Weight Management: A Review.

Authors:  Jennifer M Blankenship; Rebecca C Rosenberg; Corey A Rynders; Edward L Melanson; Victoria A Catenacci; Seth A Creasy
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  Initial Weight Change and Long-Term Changes in Weight and Compensation during Supervised Exercise Training.

Authors:  James L Dorling; Christoph Höchsmann; S Nicole Fearnbach; John W Apolzan; Daniel S Hsia; Neil M Johannsen; Tim S Church; Corby K Martin
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2021-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.