S E Anderson1, L G Bandini, W H Dietz, A Must. 1. Gerald J and Dorothy R Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA. sarah.anderson@tufts.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent that predilection for movement, as measured by a temperament questionnaire (activity temperament), contributes to nonresting energy expenditure and body composition in girls. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Baseline data for 196 premenarcheal non-obese girls aged 8-12 y were obtained from a longitudinal study of growth and development. The association of activity temperament with nonresting energy expenditure in girls with low and high levels of physical activity was evaluated, as was the association of activity temperament with body composition. MEASURES: Maternal reports of child activity temperament were obtained by questionnaire. Nonresting energy expenditure was calculated as total energy expenditure (measured by doubly labeled water) minus resting energy expenditure (obtained by indirect calorimetry). Body composition was estimated by total body water. Questionnaires and activity diaries were used to assess physical activity and sedentary behavior. RESULTS: Higher activity temperament was associated with higher nonresting energy expenditure after multivariate control for weight, vigorous activity, walking and light activity, and television viewing, although activity temperament did not account for a large percentage of the variability in nonresting energy expenditure (partial squared correlation coefficient=0.03). In girls with physical activity levels below the median, high activity temperament was associated with a mean+/-s.d., nonresting energy expenditure of 310+/-138 kJ (74+/-33 kcal) above that of girls with a low activity temperament. Girls with a high activity temperament had less body fat than did girls with a low activity temperament (21.6 vs 24.5%, a difference of 2.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.4 percentage points). CONCLUSION: Predilection for movement, as measured by a temperament questionnaire, contributes to nonresting energy expenditure and may be useful in capturing an aspect of energy expenditure in population studies. The cross-sectional observation that girls with a high activity temperament were leaner than girls with a low activity temperament suggests that a constitutional predilection for movement may play a role in the development of obesity.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent that predilection for movement, as measured by a temperament questionnaire (activity temperament), contributes to nonresting energy expenditure and body composition in girls. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Baseline data for 196 premenarcheal non-obesegirls aged 8-12 y were obtained from a longitudinal study of growth and development. The association of activity temperament with nonresting energy expenditure in girls with low and high levels of physical activity was evaluated, as was the association of activity temperament with body composition. MEASURES: Maternal reports of child activity temperament were obtained by questionnaire. Nonresting energy expenditure was calculated as total energy expenditure (measured by doubly labeled water) minus resting energy expenditure (obtained by indirect calorimetry). Body composition was estimated by total body water. Questionnaires and activity diaries were used to assess physical activity and sedentary behavior. RESULTS: Higher activity temperament was associated with higher nonresting energy expenditure after multivariate control for weight, vigorous activity, walking and light activity, and television viewing, although activity temperament did not account for a large percentage of the variability in nonresting energy expenditure (partial squared correlation coefficient=0.03). In girls with physical activity levels below the median, high activity temperament was associated with a mean+/-s.d., nonresting energy expenditure of 310+/-138 kJ (74+/-33 kcal) above that of girls with a low activity temperament. Girls with a high activity temperament had less body fat than did girls with a low activity temperament (21.6 vs 24.5%, a difference of 2.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.4 percentage points). CONCLUSION: Predilection for movement, as measured by a temperament questionnaire, contributes to nonresting energy expenditure and may be useful in capturing an aspect of energy expenditure in population studies. The cross-sectional observation that girls with a high activity temperament were leaner than girls with a low activity temperament suggests that a constitutional predilection for movement may play a role in the development of obesity.
Authors: Corby K Martin; William D Johnson; Candice A Myers; John W Apolzan; Conrad P Earnest; Diana M Thomas; Jennifer C Rood; Neil M Johannsen; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Melissa Harris; Daniel S Hsia; Timothy S Church Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Eun-Young Lee; Kylie D Hesketh; Ryan E Rhodes; Christina M Rinaldi; John C Spence; Valerie Carson Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Xiaolin Yang; Kaisa Kaseva; Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen; Laura Pulkki-Råback; Mirja Hirvensalo; Markus Jokela; Mirka Hintsanen; Taina Hintsa; Anna Kankaanpää; Risto Telama; Nina Hutri-Kähönen; Jorma S A Viikari; Olli T Raitakari; Tuija Tammelin Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2017-04
Authors: James L Dorling; Christoph Höchsmann; S Nicole Fearnbach; John W Apolzan; Daniel S Hsia; Neil M Johannsen; Tim S Church; Corby K Martin Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2021-08-01
Authors: Candice A Myers; William D Johnson; Conrad P Earnest; Jennifer C Rood; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Neil M Johannsen; Shannon Cocreham; Melissa Harris; Timothy S Church; Corby K Martin Journal: Trials Date: 2014-06-07 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: James A Janssen; Jacek Kolacz; Lilly Shanahan; Meghan J Gangel; Susan D Calkins; Susan P Keane; Laurie Wideman Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Patricia Tucker; Leigh M Vanderloo; Courtney Newnham-Kanas; Shauna M Burke; Jennifer D Irwin; Andrew M Johnson; Melissa M van Zandvoort Journal: J Public Health Res Date: 2013-09-09