| Literature DB >> 31169073 |
Tiffany Hsu1, Matthew R Gemmell2, Eric A Franzosa1, Susan Berry3, Indrani Mukhopadhya3, Richard Hansen4, Monia Michaud5, Hans Nielsen6, William G Miller7, Henrik Nielsen8, Mona Bajaj-Elliott9, Curtis Huttenhower1, Wendy S Garrett5, Georgina L Hold1,3,5,10.
Abstract
Campylobacter showae a bacterium historically linked to gingivitis and periodontitis, has recently been associated with inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. Our aim was to generate genome sequences for new clinical C. showae strains and identify functional properties explaining their pathogenic potential. Eight C. showae genomes were assessed, four strains isolated from inflamed gut tissues from paediatric Crohn's disease patients, three strains from colonic adenomas, and one from a gastroenteritis patient stool. Genome assemblies were analyzed alongside the only 3 deposited C. showae genomes. The pangenome from these 11 strains consisted of 4686 unique protein families, and the core genome size was estimated at 1050 ± 15 genes with each new genome contributing an additional 206 ± 16 genes. Functional assays indicated that colonic strains segregated into 2 groups: adherent/invasive vs. non-adherent/non-invasive strains. The former possessed Type IV secretion machinery and S-layer proteins, while the latter contained Cas genes and other CRISPR associated proteins. Comparison of gene profiles with strains in Human Microbiome Project metagenomes showed that gut-derived isolates share genes specific to tongue dorsum and supragingival plaque counterparts. Our findings indicate that C. showae strains are phenotypically and genetically diverse and suggest that secretion systems may play an important role in virulence potential.Entities:
Keywords: bacterial secretion systems; bacterial virulence factors; comparative genomics; gastrointestinal disease; genome biology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31169073 PMCID: PMC6567213 DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2019.1622455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Microbes Infect ISSN: 2222-1751 Impact factor: 7.163
C. showae strains characterized in this study.
| Strain | Patient | Patient type | Sample type | Diagnosis | Country of origin | Sequencing Platform^ | Adhesion to colonic epithelial cells+ | Invasion of colonic epithelial cells* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B32_SW | B32 | Paediatric | Biopsy | Crohn’s | UK | IM + PB | 4.85 ± 8.08 | 0.17 ± 0.03 |
| B91_SC | B91 | Paediatric | Biopsy | Crohn’s | UK | IM + PB | 0.15 ± 0.68 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| B91_SCBr | B91 | Paediatric | Biopsy | Crohn’s | UK | IM | 0.50 ± 1.08 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| B91_TPP | B91 | Paediatric | Biopsy | Crohn’s | UK | IM | 0.27 ± 0.86 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 129_MSG | 129 | Adult | Biopsy | Adenoma | UK | IM + PB | 3.42 ± 8.12 | 0.10 ± 0.01 |
| 129_VTPP | 129 | Adult | Biopsy | Adenoma | UK | IM | 4.68 ± 9.78 | 0.13 ± 0.03 |
| 129_VTPPs | 129 | Adult | Biopsy | Adenoma | UK | IM | 2.45 ± 3.04 | 0.11 ± 0.01 |
| CAM | CAM | Adult | Stool | Gastroenteritis | Denmark | PB | 1.34 ± 2.72 | 0.33 ± 0.07 |
Note: All strains’ isolation location was colonic, and all strains were positive in the Vero cell line cytotoxicity assay. Results for adhesion and invasion assays are mean ± SD of independent experiments.
^IM (Illumina MiSeq), PB (PacBio-RSII).
+Mean number of bacteria ± SD per HT-29 cell after 6 h incubation.
*Mean percentage ± SD of the original inoculum after 1 h gentamicin treatment of 6h-infected HT-29 cells.
Figure 1.Genome assemblies of eight newly-characterized C. showae strains. (A) BRIG (BLAST Ring Image Generator) [21] showing the assembled genomes aligned to the longest genome (B32_SW). KEGG BRITE [58] functional categories are annotated on the image to indicate where they are located within the genome, and strains are denoted by colors shown on the (B) phylogenetic tree (whole genome alignment, generalized time reversible model; see Methods). Bootstrap values are shown at each node. (C) Estimated number of core, new, and pan-genes within the C. showae clade with fits calculated using an exponential decay model.
Figure 2.Colonic C. showae strains demonstrate a range of virulence potential. (A) Adhesion to HT29 colonic epithelial cells with SEM. For images within inset: B32_SW- (top) and CAM-infected (bottom) cells. (B) and (C) Galleria mellonella killing. Groups of 10 larvae were used and the results shown are the means of three experiments recorded 24 h after challenge. Error bars indicate standard errors of the mean. *P < 0.05 (survival compared with C. jejuni; Welch-corrected 2-tailed t tests for pooled data from three separate experiments). (D) Evidence of biofilm formation in isolate B91_SC. Results shown are the means of three independent experiments recorded 24 h after inoculation. Error bars indicate standard errors of the mean. (E) Cytokine production from THP1-cells. Error bars indicate standard errors of the mean.
Figure 3.Campylobacter showae promotes loss of tissue architecture and exhibits altered pathogenicity in the host intestine. (A) Light micrograph of hematoxylin & eosin-stained formalin-fixed paraffin- embedded colonic tissue from C57BL/6J mouse colon explant co-cultures. (B) viability of C. showae strains following 2 hr explant co-culture. (C) RTqPCR analysis of a selection of C. showae virulence/pathogenicity genes in 2 hr pure culture and following 2 hr explant co-culture. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 4.Gene families, including T4SS, virulence factors, and CRISPR-Cas systems, differ in adherent/invasive C. showae strains. (A) Gene families that differ in their presence/absence among C. showae isolates. A subset of genes of interest are labelled with Prokka and UniRef90 annotations when available. Isolates are clustered based on “Euclidean” distances using “complete” method. (B) We searched for Type IV secretion proteins in each C. showae genome, which are displayed here by position and direction based on Prokka annotations.
Figure 5.C. showae gut isolate strains differ in their functional capacity from strains observed in oral metagenomes. Data show gene families with informative UniRef90 annotations were contained in this study’s isolates or in at least 75% of supragingival plaque metagenomes and less than 25% in tongue dorsum metagenomes from the Human Microbiome Project (or vice-versa). Clustering is by Jaccard distance.