| Literature DB >> 19008526 |
Daniel J Wilson1, Edith Gabriel, Andrew J H Leatherbarrow, John Cheesbrough, Steven Gee, Eric Bolton, Andrew Fox, C Anthony Hart, Peter J Diggle, Paul Fearnhead.
Abstract
Responsible for the majority of bacterial gastroenteritis in the developed world, Campylobacter jejuni is a pervasive pathogen of humans and animals, but its evolution is obscure. In this paper, we exploit contemporary genetic diversity and empirical evidence to piece together the evolutionary history of C. jejuni and quantify its evolutionary potential. Our combined population genetics-phylogenetics approach reveals a surprising picture. Campylobacter jejuni is a rapidly evolving species, subject to intense purifying selection that purges 60% of novel variation, but possessing a massive evolutionary potential. The low mutation rate is offset by a large effective population size so that a mutation at any site can occur somewhere in the population within the space of a week. Recombination has a fundamental role, generating diversity at twice the rate of de novo mutation, and facilitating gene flow between C. jejuni and its sister species Campylobacter coli. We attempt to calibrate the rate of molecular evolution in C. jejuni based solely on within-species variation. The rates we obtain are up to 1,000 times faster than conventional estimates, placing the C. jejuni-C. coli split at the time of the Neolithic revolution. We weigh the plausibility of such recent bacterial evolution against alternative explanations and discuss the evidence required to settle the issue.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19008526 PMCID: PMC2639114 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Evol ISSN: 0737-4038 Impact factor: 16.240
FHistograms of the number of nucleotide differences between each pair of alleles at the seven MLST loci. When Campylobacter coli–derived alleles are removed, the dark gray portions of the histograms disappear.
FCampylobacter jejuni–Campylobacter coli hybrids identified by Structure. Six sequence types were identified as hybrids. For each hybrid, the posterior probability of C. jejuni ancestry (as opposed to C. coli ancestry) is shown in gray for the seven MLST loci.
Estimates of Evolutionary Parameters in Campylobacter Jejuni
| Parameter | Units | A Posteriori | A priori 95% CI | |||
| Point Estimate | 95% CI | |||||
| Allele model | ||||||
| Mean coalescence time | Years | 209 | 155–288 | 92–820 | ||
| Allelic mutation rate | (2 | 4.38 | 3.75–5.18 | 1.1–9.4 | ||
| 1 | ||||||
| Sequence model | ||||||
| Total mutation rate | kb−1 (2 | 13.7 | 8.35–23.9 | 2.1–180 | ||
| Synonymous mutation rate | kb−1 (2Neg)−1 | 11.8 | 7.51–19.7 | 1.9–170 | ||
| Nonsynonymous mutation rate | kb−1 (2 | 1.9 | 0.84–4.2 | 0.2–10 | ||
| Neutral mutation rate | kb−1 (2 | 35.6 | 22.0–61.8 | 5.8–510 | ||
| Transition–transversion ratio | 19.0 | 8.85–39.8 | 3.3–180 | |||
| 0.0283 | 0.0165–0.0492 | 0.0022–0.18 | ||||
| Recombination rate between distant loci | (2 | 6.08 | 3.19–11.2 | 2 × 10−4–8 × 105 | ||
| Recombination rate | kb−1 (2 | 1.31 | 0.0273–42.2 | 0.0014–72 | ||
| τ | Mean DNA import length | kb | 4.54 | 0.100–214 | 0.015–6,800 | |
The geometric mean was used to obtain point estimates. The (2.5%, 97.5%) quantiles were used to calculate the 95% CI. All priors were uniform on the logarithmic scale.
Dating Ancestral Events
| Calibrated Date | Uncalibrated Date (Units of | ||||
| Event | Point Estimate | 95% CI | Point Estimate | 95% CI | |
| MRCA | 1,592 | 1,305–1,772 | 1.87 | 9.21 × 10−1–3.68 | |
| Import of | August 2000 | Jan 1997–Mar 2001 | 1.34 × 10−3 | 8.68 × 10−5–0.0422 | |
| Import of | January 1998 | Jul 1965–May 2000 | 8.73 × 10−3 | 8.25 × 10−4–0.244 | |
| Import of | March 1966 | Sep 1726–Jul 1996 | 1.20 × 10−1 | 1.23 × 10−2–1.06 | |
Calibrated Rate Parameters in Campylobacter jejuni
| Parameter | Units | Point Estimate | 95% CI | |
| Total mutation rate | kb−1 year−1 | 3.23 × 10−2 | 1.86 × 10−2–5.81 × 10−2 | |
| Synonymous mutation rate | kb−1 year−1 | 2.79 × 10−2 | 1.60 × 10−2–5.08 × 10−2 | |
| Nonsynonymous mutation rate | kb−1 year−1 | 4.40 × 10−3 | 2.60 × 10−3–7.30 × 10−3 | |
| Neutral mutation rate | kb−1 year−1 | 8.39 × 10−2 | 4.85 × 10−2–1.51 × 10−1 | |
| Recombination rate between distant loci | Year−1 | 1.45 × 10−2 | 7.11 × 10−3–2.92 × 10−2 | |
| Recombination rate | kb−1 year−1 | 3.07 × 10−3 | 4.79 × 10−5–1.27 × 10−1 | |
FInference based on empirical parameter estimation. Posterior distributions of (a) generation length g, (b) mutation rate m0, (c) effective population size Ne, and (d) waiting time for a novel mutation W, based on empirical estimates of the generation length (dark gray histograms) or mutation rate (light gray histograms), and population genetic estimate of θ0 (c, d). The empirical data are indicated with black lines crossing the horizontal axis in (a) and (b). The background histogram in (c) and (d) additionally depends on the population genetic estimate of Neg, rendering them sensitive to the calibration of the molecular clock. See table 4 for more details.
Inference Based on Empirical Parameter Estimates
| Parameter | Units | Method | Point Estimate | 95% CI | |
| Empirical estimates | |||||
| Generation length | Years | In vitro doubling times | 2.79 × 10−4 | 8.20 × 10−5–9.46 × 10−4 | |
| Hours | 2.44 | 0.719–8.29 | |||
| Neutral mutation rate | kb−1 g−1 | Drake's method | 2.77 × 10−6 | 2.26 × 10−7–3.41 × 10−5 | |
| Composite estimates | |||||
| Effective population size | 6.42 × 106 | 4.95 × 105–8.29 × 107 | |||
| 7.50 × 105 | 2.13 × 105–2.64 × 106 | ||||
| Inverse population mutation rate | Days | 5.71 | 1.52–21.4 | ||
| Days | 0.667 | 0.0437–10.2 | |||
| Neutral mutation rate | kb−1 year−1 | 9.95 × 10−3 | 6.18 × 10−4–1.60 × 10−1 | ||
Methods denoted by † are calibration sensitive.
FPhylogeny of the genus Campylobacter. Nodes are labeled with estimated divergence times using BEAST. Error bars associated with each node indicate relative uncertainty in node height. Uncertainty due to calibration of the molecular clock is represented by a 95% CI below the scale bar. Posterior uncertainty in the tree topology was negligible. The scale bar was calibrated from intraspecific variation in Campylobacter jejuni. For alternative scales, see table 7.
Phylogenetic Split Times in the Genus Campylobacter
| Split | Point Estimate | 95% CI | |
| Relative Uncertainty | Total Uncertainty | ||
| 6,580 | 6,240–6,930 | 3,580–12,400 | |
| 4,400 | 4,190–4,630 | 2,400–8,290 | |
| 6,530 | 6,150–6,940 | 3,560–12,500 | |
| 16,000 | 15,200–16,800 | 8,800–30,300 | |
| 21,200 | 20,300–22,100 | 11,600–39,500 | |
| 33,800 | 32,800–34,800 | 19,000–62,600 | |
Alternative Scale Bars for Campylobacter Phylogeny
| Method | Scale (Years) | 95% CI |
| Intraspecific | 5,000 | 2,830–8,820 |
| Empirical | 42,200 | 2,690–661,000 |
| Ochman–Wilson | 7,600,000 | Not quantified |
| Coalescent | 23.6 | 14.1 |
Based on μS from table 3.
Based on μ calculated from μ0 in table 4.
Based on Dingle et al. (2005).
Based on θS from table 1.
Evolutionary Parameters in the Genus Campylobacter
| Parameter | Point Estimate | 95% CI |
| 2.93 × 10−2 | 1.60 × 10−2–4.99 × 10−2 | |
| 1.81 | 1.51–2.15 | |
| 0.0120 | 0.00961–0.0152 | |
| 0.0452 | 0.0149–0.120 |