BACKGROUND: Visualisation of genome comparisons is invaluable for helping to determine genotypic differences between closely related prokaryotes. New visualisation and abstraction methods are required in order to improve the validation, interpretation and communication of genome sequence information; especially with the increasing amount of data arising from next-generation sequencing projects. Visualising a prokaryote genome as a circular image has become a powerful means of displaying informative comparisons of one genome to a number of others. Several programs, imaging libraries and internet resources already exist for this purpose, however, most are either limited in the number of comparisons they can show, are unable to adequately utilise draft genome sequence data, or require a knowledge of command-line scripting for implementation. Currently, there is no freely available desktop application that enables users to rapidly visualise comparisons between hundreds of draft or complete genomes in a single image. RESULTS: BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) can generate images that show multiple prokaryote genome comparisons, without an arbitrary limit on the number of genomes compared. The output image shows similarity between a central reference sequence and other sequences as a set of concentric rings, where BLAST matches are coloured on a sliding scale indicating a defined percentage identity. Images can also include draft genome assembly information to show read coverage, assembly breakpoints and collapsed repeats. In addition, BRIG supports the mapping of unassembled sequencing reads against one or more central reference sequences. Many types of custom data and annotations can be shown using BRIG, making it a versatile approach for visualising a range of genomic comparison data. BRIG is readily accessible to any user, as it assumes no specialist computational knowledge and will perform all required file parsing and BLAST comparisons automatically. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear need for a user-friendly program that can produce genome comparisons for a large number of prokaryote genomes with an emphasis on rapidly utilising unfinished or unassembled genome data. Here we present BRIG, a cross-platform application that enables the interactive generation of comparative genomic images via a simple graphical-user interface. BRIG is freely available for all operating systems at http://sourceforge.net/projects/brig/.
BACKGROUND: Visualisation of genome comparisons is invaluable for helping to determine genotypic differences between closely related prokaryotes. New visualisation and abstraction methods are required in order to improve the validation, interpretation and communication of genome sequence information; especially with the increasing amount of data arising from next-generation sequencing projects. Visualising a prokaryote genome as a circular image has become a powerful means of displaying informative comparisons of one genome to a number of others. Several programs, imaging libraries and internet resources already exist for this purpose, however, most are either limited in the number of comparisons they can show, are unable to adequately utilise draft genome sequence data, or require a knowledge of command-line scripting for implementation. Currently, there is no freely available desktop application that enables users to rapidly visualise comparisons between hundreds of draft or complete genomes in a single image. RESULTS: BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG) can generate images that show multiple prokaryote genome comparisons, without an arbitrary limit on the number of genomes compared. The output image shows similarity between a central reference sequence and other sequences as a set of concentric rings, where BLAST matches are coloured on a sliding scale indicating a defined percentage identity. Images can also include draft genome assembly information to show read coverage, assembly breakpoints and collapsed repeats. In addition, BRIG supports the mapping of unassembled sequencing reads against one or more central reference sequences. Many types of custom data and annotations can be shown using BRIG, making it a versatile approach for visualising a range of genomic comparison data. BRIG is readily accessible to any user, as it assumes no specialist computational knowledge and will perform all required file parsing and BLAST comparisons automatically. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear need for a user-friendly program that can produce genome comparisons for a large number of prokaryote genomes with an emphasis on rapidly utilising unfinished or unassembled genome data. Here we present BRIG, a cross-platform application that enables the interactive generation of comparative genomic images via a simple graphical-user interface. BRIG is freely available for all operating systems at http://sourceforge.net/projects/brig/.
Authors: Reinhard Engels; Tamara Yu; Chris Burge; Jill P Mesirov; David DeCaprio; James E Galagan Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2006-05-18 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: F R Blattner; G Plunkett; C A Bloch; N T Perna; V Burland; M Riley; J Collado-Vides; J D Glasner; C K Rode; G F Mayhew; J Gregor; N W Davis; H A Kirkpatrick; M A Goeden; D J Rose; B Mau; Y Shao Journal: Science Date: 1997-09-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: N T Perna; G Plunkett; V Burland; B Mau; J D Glasner; D J Rose; G F Mayhew; P S Evans; J Gregor; H A Kirkpatrick; G Pósfai; J Hackett; S Klink; A Boutin; Y Shao; L Miller; E J Grotbeck; N W Davis; A Lim; E T Dimalanta; K D Potamousis; J Apodaca; T S Anantharaman; J Lin; G Yen; D C Schwartz; R A Welch; F R Blattner Journal: Nature Date: 2001-01-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Zhemin Zhou; Xiaomin Li; Bin Liu; Lothar Beutin; Jianguo Xu; Yan Ren; Lu Feng; Ruiting Lan; Peter R Reeves; Lei Wang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Atsushi Iguchi; Nicholas R Thomson; Yoshitoshi Ogura; David Saunders; Tadasuke Ooka; Ian R Henderson; David Harris; M Asadulghani; Ken Kurokawa; Paul Dean; Brendan Kenny; Michael A Quail; Scott Thurston; Gordon Dougan; Tetsuya Hayashi; Julian Parkhill; Gad Frankel Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2008-10-24 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Magnus Unemo; Daniel Golparian; Leonor Sánchez-Busó; Yonatan Grad; Susanne Jacobsson; Makoto Ohnishi; Monica M Lahra; Athena Limnios; Aleksandra E Sikora; Teodora Wi; Simon R Harris Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2016-07-17 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Janetta Top; Jan C Sinnige; Ellen C Brouwer; Guido Werner; Jukka Corander; Juliëtte A Severin; Rogier Jansen; E Bathoorn; Marc J M Bonten; John W A Rossen; Rob J L Willems Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-02-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Cheryl A Whistler; Jeffrey A Hall; Feng Xu; Saba Ilyas; Puskar Siwakoti; Vaughn S Cooper; Stephen H Jones Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Scott A Beatson; Nouri L Ben Zakour; Makrina Totsika; Brian M Forde; Rebecca E Watts; Amanda N Mabbett; Jan M Szubert; Sohinee Sarkar; Minh-Duy Phan; Kate M Peters; Nicola K Petty; Nabil-Fareed Alikhan; Mitchell J Sullivan; Jayde A Gawthorne; Mitchell Stanton-Cook; Nguyen Thi Khanh Nhu; Teik Min Chong; Wai-Fong Yin; Kok-Gan Chan; Viktoria Hancock; David W Ussery; Glen C Ulett; Mark A Schembri Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Adam Valcek; Petra Sismova; Kristina Nesporova; Søren Overballe-Petersen; Ibrahim Bitar; Ivana Jamborova; Arie Kant; Jaroslav Hrabak; Jaap A Wagenaar; Jean-Yves Madec; Peter Damborg; Engeline van Duijkeren; Christa Ewers; Joost Hordijk; Henrik Hasman; Michael S M Brouwer; Monika Dolejska Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 5.191