Mia Djulbegovic1,2, Jason W Beckstead3, Liana Fraenkel4,5. 1. National Clinician Scholars Program, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, Courier SHM IE-66, PO Box 208088, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. mia.djulbegovic@yale.edu. 2. Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, 06516, USA. mia.djulbegovic@yale.edu. 3. College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. 4. Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, 06516, USA. 5. Section of Rheumatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520-8031, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient care ownership is essential to delivering high-quality medical care but appears to be eroding among trainees. The lack of an objective measure has limited the study of ownership in physicians. OBJECTIVE: To develop an instrument to measure psychological ownership of patient care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine trainees in a large, academic hospital completing an inpatient rotation. MAIN MEASURES: Our scale prototype adapted an existing ownership scale (developed in the non-medical setting) based on themes identified in qualitative studies of patient care ownership. We conducted cognitive interviews to determine face validity of the scale items. Our finalized scale measures ownership's key constructs: advocacy, responsibility, accountability, follow-through, knowledge, communication, initiative, continuity of care, autonomy, and perceived ownership. We distributed an online, anonymous, 46-question survey to 219 residents; 192 residents completed the survey; and 166 responses were included in the analysis. We calculated Cronbach's α to determine the scale's internal consistency. Exploratory factor analysis was used to explore possible subscales. We examined construct validity using bivariate and correlational analysis. KEY RESULTS: The 15-item ownership scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.89). We identified three possible subscales corresponding to assertiveness, being the "go-to" person, and diligence. Training level and prior intensive care unit experience significantly predicted ownership (p < 0.01). There was no significant relationship between ownership and age, gender, inpatient service type, call schedule, patient turnover, or supervisory experience of the attending physician. We found a significant negative correlation between ownership and perceived degree of burnout (r = - 0.33), depression (r = - 0.24), detachment (r = - 0.35), and frustration (r = - 0.31) and a significant positive association between ownership and fulfillment (r = 0.37) and happiness (r = 0.36). CONCLUSION: We developed an instrument to quantify patient care ownership in residents. Our scale demonstrates good internal consistency and preliminary evidence of validity. With further validation, we expect this to be a valuable tool to evaluate interventions aimed at improving ownership.
BACKGROUND:Patient care ownership is essential to delivering high-quality medical care but appears to be eroding among trainees. The lack of an objective measure has limited the study of ownership in physicians. OBJECTIVE: To develop an instrument to measure psychological ownership of patient care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine trainees in a large, academic hospital completing an inpatient rotation. MAIN MEASURES: Our scale prototype adapted an existing ownership scale (developed in the non-medical setting) based on themes identified in qualitative studies of patient care ownership. We conducted cognitive interviews to determine face validity of the scale items. Our finalized scale measures ownership's key constructs: advocacy, responsibility, accountability, follow-through, knowledge, communication, initiative, continuity of care, autonomy, and perceived ownership. We distributed an online, anonymous, 46-question survey to 219 residents; 192 residents completed the survey; and 166 responses were included in the analysis. We calculated Cronbach's α to determine the scale's internal consistency. Exploratory factor analysis was used to explore possible subscales. We examined construct validity using bivariate and correlational analysis. KEY RESULTS: The 15-item ownership scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.89). We identified three possible subscales corresponding to assertiveness, being the "go-to" person, and diligence. Training level and prior intensive care unit experience significantly predicted ownership (p < 0.01). There was no significant relationship between ownership and age, gender, inpatient service type, call schedule, patient turnover, or supervisory experience of the attending physician. We found a significant negative correlation between ownership and perceived degree of burnout (r = - 0.33), depression (r = - 0.24), detachment (r = - 0.35), and frustration (r = - 0.31) and a significant positive association between ownership and fulfillment (r = 0.37) and happiness (r = 0.36). CONCLUSION: We developed an instrument to quantify patient care ownership in residents. Our scale demonstrates good internal consistency and preliminary evidence of validity. With further validation, we expect this to be a valuable tool to evaluate interventions aimed at improving ownership.
Entities:
Keywords:
behavioral science; medical decision-making; medical education
Authors: Sanjay V Desai; David A Asch; Lisa M Bellini; Krisda H Chaiyachati; Manqing Liu; Alice L Sternberg; James Tonascia; Alyssa M Yeager; Jeremy M Asch; Joel T Katz; Mathias Basner; David W Bates; Karl Y Bilimoria; David F Dinges; Orit Even-Shoshan; David M Shade; Jeffrey H Silber; Dylan S Small; Kevin G Volpp; Judy A Shea Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amber T Pincavage; Marcus Dahlstrom; Megan Prochaska; Shana Ratner; Kimberly J Beiting; Julie Oyler; Lisa M Vinci; Vineet M Arora Journal: Acad Med Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Kimberly McLaren; Julie Lord; Suzanne B Murray; Mitchell Levy; Paul Ciechanowski; Jesse Markman; Anna Ratzliff; Michael Grodesky; Deborah S Cowley Journal: Perspect Med Educ Date: 2013-04-23
Authors: Mia Djulbegovic; Shradha A Kulkarni; Katherine L Chen; Maureen Canavan; Marney A White; W Cameron McGuire; Savan Shan; Revati Reddy; Shannon Kay; Liana Fraenkel Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 5.128