Michelle E Kiger1,2, Holly S Meyer3, Lara Varpio3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. michelle.kiger@usuhs.edu. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Wright-Patterson Medical Center, Dayton, OH, USA. michelle.kiger@usuhs.edu. 3. Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Patient ownership is an important element of physicians' professional responsibility, but important gaps remain in our understanding of this concept. We sought to develop a theory of patient ownership by studying it in continuity clinics from the perspective of residents, attending physicians, and patients. METHODS: Using constructivist grounded theory, we conducted 27 semi-structured interviews of attending physicians, residents, and patient families within two pediatric continuity clinics to examine definitions, expectations, and experiences of patient ownership from March-August 2019. We constructed themes using constant comparative analysis and developed a theory describing patient ownership that takes into account a diversity of perspectives. RESULTS: Patient ownership was described as a bi-directional, relational commitment between patient/family and physician that includes affective and behavioral components. The experience of patient ownership was promoted by continuity of care and constrained by logistical and other systems-based factors. The physician was seen as part of a medical care team that included clinic staff and patient families. Physicians adjusted expectations surrounding patient ownership for residents based on scheduling limitations. DISCUSSION: Our theory of patient ownership portrays the patient/family as an active participant in the patient-physician relationship, rather than a passive recipient of care. While specific expectations and tasks will vary based on the practice setting, our findings reframe the way in which patient ownership can be viewed and studied in the future by attending to a diversity of perspectives.
INTRODUCTION:Patient ownership is an important element of physicians' professional responsibility, but important gaps remain in our understanding of this concept. We sought to develop a theory of patient ownership by studying it in continuity clinics from the perspective of residents, attending physicians, and patients. METHODS: Using constructivist grounded theory, we conducted 27 semi-structured interviews of attending physicians, residents, and patient families within two pediatric continuity clinics to examine definitions, expectations, and experiences of patient ownership from March-August 2019. We constructed themes using constant comparative analysis and developed a theory describing patient ownership that takes into account a diversity of perspectives. RESULTS:Patient ownership was described as a bi-directional, relational commitment between patient/family and physician that includes affective and behavioral components. The experience of patient ownership was promoted by continuity of care and constrained by logistical and other systems-based factors. The physician was seen as part of a medical care team that included clinic staff and patient families. Physicians adjusted expectations surrounding patient ownership for residents based on scheduling limitations. DISCUSSION: Our theory of patient ownership portrays the patient/family as an active participant in the patient-physician relationship, rather than a passive recipient of care. While specific expectations and tasks will vary based on the practice setting, our findings reframe the way in which patient ownership can be viewed and studied in the future by attending to a diversity of perspectives.
Entities:
Keywords:
Continuity of care; Patient ownership; Professionalism; Resident continuity clinics; Team-based care
Authors: Michelle E Kiger; Holly S Meyer; Caitlin Hammond; Katherine M Miller; Kara J Dickey; Daniel V Hammond; Lara Varpio Journal: Acad Med Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Maureen D Francis; Kris Thomas; Michael Langan; Amy Smith; Sean Drake; Keri Lyn Gwisdalla; Ronald R Jones; Katherine A Julian; Christopher Nabors; Anne Pereira; Michael Rosenblum; Andrew Varney; Eric Warm; Melchor Ortiz Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2014-06
Authors: Paul A Nutting; Meredith A Goodwin; Susan A Flocke; Stephen J Zyzanski; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jason Hom; Ilana Richman; Jonathan H Chen; Baldeep Singh; Casey Crump; Jeffrey Chi Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Deborah S Cowley; Jesse D Markman; Jennifer A Best; Erica L Greenberg; Michael J Grodesky; Suzanne B Murray; Kelli A Corning; Mitchell R Levy; William E Greenberg Journal: Perspect Med Educ Date: 2017-12