Literature DB >> 2817162

Late-stage diagnosis of breast cancer in women of lower socioeconomic status: public health implications.

T A Farley1, J T Flannery.   

Abstract

To assess the success of breast cancer control activities in Connecticut, we examined data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry, determining differences in breast cancer stage at time of diagnosis over time and in selected subgroups. From 1982 to 1985, the percentage of women with cancer confined to the breast increased from 54.0 percent to 61.3 percent. During 1984 and 1985, lower socioeconomic status (SES) women with breast cancer were less likely than higher SES women to be diagnosed with early-stage disease (56.9 percent vs 62.7 percent). SES was estimated by census tract of residence. In the same years, the overall incidence of breast cancer was greater in higher SES women. Projections based on these incidence data found that lower SES women, as compared to higher SES women, had a higher rate of expected breast cancer deaths (24.6 vs 19.7 per 100,000), and a greater percentage of those deaths considered preventable by early detection (22 percent vs 11 percent). The rate of preventable deaths in lower SES women was 2.5 times as great as that for higher SES women (5.3 vs 2.1 per 100,000). Tumor registries can serve as useful surveillance systems to aid cancer control programs. Breast cancer early-detection programs should give special attention to lower SES women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2817162      PMCID: PMC1349803          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.11.1508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  12 in total

1.  Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Socio-economic factors in the prognosis of cancer patients.

Authors:  L Lipworth; T Abelin; R R Connelly
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1970-08

3.  Mammary cancer trends.

Authors:  S J Cutler; R R Connelly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: five-year summary report.

Authors:  L H Baker
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  The Connecticut Tumor Registry: yesterday, today and tomorrow.

Authors:  J T Flannery; D T Janerich
Journal:  Conn Med       Date:  1985-11

7.  Survival experience in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.

Authors:  H Seidman; S K Gelb; E Silverberg; N LaVerda; J A Lubera
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Economic status and survival of cancer patients.

Authors:  J W Berg; R Ross; H B Latourette
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Relationship of ethnicity and other prognostic factors to breast cancer survival patterns in Hawaii.

Authors:  L LeMarchand; L N Kolonel; A M Nomura
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  41 in total

1.  Geographic socioeconomic status, race, and advanced-stage breast cancer in New York City.

Authors:  Sharon Stein Merkin; Lori Stevenson; Neil Powe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Associations of income with self-reported ill-health and health resources in a rural community sample of Austria.

Authors:  W Freidl; W J Stronegger; E Rásky; C Neuhold
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2001

3.  The effects of hospice coverage on Medicare expenditures.

Authors:  D Kidder
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Conclusions on cancer and low socioeconomic status questioned.

Authors:  R A Gunn; D M Sosin; T A Farley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Intra-urban differences in breast cancer mortality: a study from the city of Malmö in Sweden.

Authors:  J Manjer; G Berglund; L Bondesson; J P Garne; L Janzon; A Lindgren; J Malina; S Matson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Unemployment and the likelihood of detecting early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  R A Catalano; W A Satariano
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Health Belief Model variables as predictors of screening mammography utilization.

Authors:  R B Hyman; S Baker; R Ephraim; A Moadel; J Philip
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-08

Review 8.  Impact of poverty on women's health.

Authors:  M Cohen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  A randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Lisa K Christman; Paul B Jacobsen; Alan B Cantor; Jennifer Schroeder; Rania Abdulla; Seft Hunter; Thomas N Chirikos; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Visualizing and testing the impact of place on late-stage breast cancer incidence: a non-parametric geostatistical approach.

Authors:  Pierre Goovaerts
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.