Literature DB >> 20956819

Mode of detection and secular time for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Etta D Pisano1.   

Abstract

In this article, the published literature on the role of screening mammography in the detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is reviewed. This includes what is known about the detection of DCIS in different demographic groups. Finally the author describes her views on how the field might be advanced.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20956819      PMCID： PMC5161066          DOI： 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN： 1052-6773


  31 in total

1.  Initial clinical experience with microwave breast imaging in women with normal mammography.

Authors:  Paul M Meaney; Margaret W Fanning; Timothy Raynolds; Colleen J Fox; Qianqian Fang; Christine A Kogel; Steven P Poplack; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Computed tomography for imaging the breast.

Authors:  John M Boone; Alex L C Kwan; Kai Yang; George W Burkett; Karen K Lindfors; Thomas R Nelson
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

3.  Survival experience in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.

Authors:  H Seidman; S K Gelb; E Silverberg; N LaVerda; J A Lubera
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening?

Authors:  L Tabár; S W Duffy; B Vitak; H H Chen; T C Prevost
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The New Mexico Mammography Project. Screening mammography performance in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1991 to 1993.

Authors:  R D Rosenberg; J F Lando; W C Hunt; R R Darling; M R Williamson; M N Linver; F D Gilliland; C R Key
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Recent advances in breast-specific imaging.

Authors:  Claudia G Berman
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  V L Ernster; J Barclay; K Kerlikowske; D Grady; C Henderson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-03-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Comparisons of three alternative breast modalities in a common phantom imaging experiment.

Authors:  Dun Li; Paul M Meaney; Tor D Tosteson; Shudong Jiang; Todd E Kerner; Troy O McBride; Brian W Pogue; Alexander Hartov; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.071
View more
  1 in total

1.  Predicting invasive breast cancer versus DCIS in different age groups.

Authors:  Mehmet U S Ayvaci; Oguzhan Alagoz; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Alejandro Munoz del Rio; Edward A Sickles; Houssam Nassif; Karla Kerlikowske; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 4.430
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.