Literature DB >> 31152079

Impact of 21-Gene Breast Cancer Assay on Treatment Decision for Patients with T1-T3, N0-N1, Estrogen Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer: Final Results of the Prospective Multicenter ROXANE Study.

Maria Vittoria Dieci1,2, Valentina Guarneri1,2, Fable Zustovich3, Marta Mion4, Paolo Morandi5, Emilio Bria6,7, Laura Merlini8, Pierluigi Bullian9, Cristina Oliani10, Stefania Gori11, Tommaso Giarratano2, Enrico Orvieto12, Gaia Griguolo1, Silvia Michieletto13, Tania Saibene13, Paola Del Bianco2, Gian Luca De Salvo2, PierFranco Conte14,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ROXANE Italian prospective study evaluated the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) results on adjuvant treatment decision for patients with early breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine centers participated. Physicians used the RS test whenever unsure about adjuvant treatment recommendation for patients with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative, T1-T3, N0-N1 early breast cancer. Pre-RS and post-RS treatment recommendations were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 251 patients were included. N0 patients (61%) showed higher grade (p < .001) and higher Ki67 (p = .001) and were more frequently progesterone receptor negative (p = .012) as compared with N1 patients. RS results were as follows: <11, n = 63 (25.1%); 11-25, n = 143 (57%); and ≥26, n = 45 (17.9%). Higher RS was found in N0 vs. N1 patients (p = .001) and in cases of G3 (p < .001) and higher Ki67 (p < .001). The rate of change in treatment decision was 30% (n = 75), mostly from chemotherapy (CT) plus hormone therapy (CT + HT) to hormone therapy (HT; 76%, n = 57/75). The proportion of patients recommended to CT + HT was significantly reduced from pre-RS to post-RS (52% to 36%, p < .0001). CT use reduction was more evident for N1 patients (55% to 27%) than for N0 patients (50% to 42%) and was observed only in cases of RS ≤17.
CONCLUSION: Physicians predominantly used the 21-gene assay in N0 patients with a more aggressive biology or in N1 patients showing more indolent biology. In this selected patient population, the use of RS testing led to a 30% rate of change in treatment decision. In the N1 patient subgroup, the use of RS testing contributed to reduce CT use by more than half. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study shows that, even in a context in which physicians recommend a high proportion of patients to endocrine treatment alone before knowing the results of the Recurrence Score (RS) assay, the use of the RS test, whenever uncertainty regarding adjuvant treatment recommendation is present, significantly contributes in further reducing the use of chemotherapy, especially for N1 patients. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  21‐gene assay; Adjuvant chemotherapy; Decision impact; Early breast cancer; Estrogen receptor positive; Oncotype DX; Recurrence Score; Treatment change

Year:  2019        PMID: 31152079      PMCID: PMC6853101          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  21 in total

1.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Steven Shak; Gong Tang; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Michael G Walker; Drew Watson; Taesung Park; William Hiller; Edwin R Fisher; D Lawrence Wickerham; John Bryant; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  First Prospective Multicenter Italian Study on the Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Adjuvant Clinical Decisions for Patients with ER Positive/HER2 Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Dieci; Valentina Guarneri; Tommaso Giarratano; Marta Mion; Giampaolo Tortora; Costanza De Rossi; Stefania Gori; Cristina Oliani; Laura Merlini; Felice Pasini; Giorgio Bonciarelli; Gaia Griguolo; Enrico Orvieto; Silvia Michieletto; Tania Saibene; Paola Del Bianco; Gian Luca De Salvo; PierFranco Conte
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-11-13

3.  West German Study Group Phase III PlanB Trial: First Prospective Outcome Data for the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay and Concordance of Prognostic Markers by Central and Local Pathology Assessment.

Authors:  Oleg Gluz; Ulrike A Nitz; Matthias Christgen; Ronald E Kates; Steven Shak; Michael Clemens; Stefan Kraemer; Bahriye Aktas; Sherko Kuemmel; Toralf Reimer; Manfred Kusche; Volker Heyl; Fatemeh Lorenz-Salehi; Marianne Just; Daniel Hofmann; Tom Degenhardt; Cornelia Liedtke; Christer Svedman; Rachel Wuerstlein; Hans H Kreipe; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Fatima Cardoso; Laura J van't Veer; Jan Bogaerts; Leen Slaets; Giuseppe Viale; Suzette Delaloge; Jean-Yves Pierga; Etienne Brain; Sylvain Causeret; Mauro DeLorenzi; Annuska M Glas; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Theodora Goulioti; Susan Knox; Erika Matos; Bart Meulemans; Peter A Neijenhuis; Ulrike Nitz; Rodolfo Passalacqua; Peter Ravdin; Isabel T Rubio; Mahasti Saghatchian; Tineke J Smilde; Christos Sotiriou; Lisette Stork; Carolyn Straehle; Geraldine Thomas; Alastair M Thompson; Jacobus M van der Hoeven; Peter Vuylsteke; René Bernards; Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Emiel Rutgers; Martine Piccart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Edith A Perez; John A Olson; JoAnne Zujewski; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Peter Ravdin; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; James N Atkins; Jeffrey L Berenberg; George W Sledge
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Matthew P Goetz; John A Olson; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Peter M Ravdin; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Jeffrey Abrams; George W Sledge
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Jack Cuzick; Christopher Wale; John Forbes; Elizabeth A Mallon; Janine Salter; Emma Quinn; Anita Dunbier; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Anthony Howell; Roberto Bugarini; Frederick L Baehner; Steven Shak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; David G Hicks; Mitch Dowsett; Lisa M McShane; Kimberly H Allison; Donald C Allred; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Pamela B Mangu; Soonmyung Paik; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Breast-cancer-specific mortality in patients treated based on the 21-gene assay: a SEER population-based study.

Authors:  Valentina I Petkov; Dave P Miller; Nadia Howlader; Nathan Gliner; Will Howe; Nicola Schussler; Kathleen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Rosemary Cress; Dennis Deapen; Sally L Glaser; Brenda Y Hernandez; Charles F Lynch; Lloyd Mueller; Ann G Schwartz; Stephen M Schwartz; Antoinette Stroup; Carol Sweeney; Thomas C Tucker; Kevin C Ward; Charles Wiggins; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Lynne Penberthy; Steven Shak
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-06-08
View more
  8 in total

1.  Impact of Recurrence Score on type and duration of chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  K Willemsma; W Yip; N LeVasseur; K Dobosz; C Illmann; S Baxter; C Lohrisch; C E Simmons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Real-world analysis of clinical and economic impact of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) testing in early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) in Ireland.

Authors:  L M McSorley; M Tharmabala; F Al Rahbi; K McSorley; S Chew; D Evoy; J G Geraghty; R S Prichard; J Rothwell; D P McCartan; E W McDermott; M Keane; M J Kennedy; S O'Reilly; S J Millen; J P Crown; L M Smyth; C M Kelly; C M Quinn; J M Walshe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Impact of the EndoPredict genomic assay on treatment decisions for oestrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer patients: benefits of physician selective testing.

Authors:  Phuong Dinh; J Dinny Graham; Elisabeth N Elder; Masrura Kabir; Tram B Doan; James French; Farid Meybodi; Rina Hui; Nicholas R Wilcken; Paul R Harnett; Jeremy Hsu; Kirsty E Stuart; Tim Wang; Verity Ahern; Meagan Brennan; Stephen B Fox; Rachel F Dear; Elgene Lim; Michelle White; G Bruce Mann; Nirmala Pathmanathan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Addressing the problem of overtreatment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Linda M Pak; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.627

5.  Do 21-Gene Recurrence Score Influence Chemotherapy Decisions in T1bN0 Breast Cancer Patients?

Authors:  Jing Yu; Jiayi Wu; Ou Huang; Jianrong He; Zhu Li; Weiguo Chen; Yafen Li; Xiaosong Chen; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  The Oncotype DX Recurrence Score's Impact on the Management of Oestrogen-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative, Low-Burden Axillary Status Breast Cancer (REHAB Study): Results of a Single Centre.

Authors:  Abdalla Saad Abdalla Al-Zawi; Su-Lei Yin; Bayan Mahmood; Awais Jalil; Zina Aladili
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-27

7.  Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Treatment Decisions and Cost in Patients with Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study in Quebec.

Authors:  Saima Hassan; Rami Younan; Erica Patocskai; Louise Provencher; Brigitte Poirier; Luca Sideris; Pierre Dubé; Catalin Mihalcioiu; Malorie Chabot-Blanchet; Marie-Claude Guertin; Jean-François Boileau; André Robidoux
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 8.  The Role of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score® Assay in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The Canadian Experience.

Authors:  Mariya Yordanova; Saima Hassan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.