K Willemsma1, W Yip2, N LeVasseur3, K Dobosz4, C Illmann2, S Baxter3, C Lohrisch3, C E Simmons3. 1. Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON. 2. Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON. 3. Medical Oncology, BC. 4. Cancer Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Abstract
Background: The use of Oncotype dx (Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA, U.S.A.) testing has been shown to change treatment decisions in approximately 30% of breast cancer (bca) cases, but research on how Recurrence Score testing has affected the type of chemotherapy offered is limited. We sought to determine if the availability of Oncotype dx testing resulted in a change to the type and duration of chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of early-stage hormone receptor-positive bca. Methods: In a population-based cohort study, patients treated in the 2 years before the availability of Oncotype dx testing were compared with patients treated in the 2 years after testing availability. Charts were audited and divided into 2 groups: pre-Oncotype dx and post-Oncotype dx. The groups were compared for differences in duration of chemotherapy (12 weeks vs. >12 weeks), types of agents used (anthracycline vs. non-anthracycline), and myelosuppressive potential of the chosen regimen. Results: Of 834 patients who fulfilled the enrolment criteria, 360 fell into the pre-Oncotype dx era, and 474, into the post-Oncotype dx era. An increase of 11.2 percentage points, to 69.5% from 58.3%, was observed in the proportion of patients receiving short-course compared with long-course chemotherapy (p = 0.068). The proportion of patients prescribed anthracycline-containing regimens declined in the post-Oncotype dx era (47.7% pre vs. 32.2% post, p = 0.016). The selection of more-myelosuppressive chemotherapy protocols increased in the post-Oncotype dx era (67.4% pre vs. 78.8% post, p = 0.044). Conclusions: In the present study, the availability of Oncotype dx testing was observed to influence the choice of chemotherapy type in the setting of early-stage bca. 2020 Multimed Inc.
Background: The use of Oncotype dx (Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA, U.S.A.) testing has been shown to change treatment decisions in approximately 30% of breast cancer (bca) cases, but research on how Recurrence Score testing has affected the type of chemotherapy offered is limited. We sought to determine if the availability of Oncotype dx testing resulted in a change to the type and duration of chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of early-stage hormone receptor-positive bca. Methods: In a population-based cohort study, patients treated in the 2 years before the availability of Oncotype dx testing were compared with patients treated in the 2 years after testing availability. Charts were audited and divided into 2 groups: pre-Oncotype dx and post-Oncotype dx. The groups were compared for differences in duration of chemotherapy (12 weeks vs. >12 weeks), types of agents used (anthracycline vs. non-anthracycline), and myelosuppressive potential of the chosen regimen. Results: Of 834 patients who fulfilled the enrolment criteria, 360 fell into the pre-Oncotype dx era, and 474, into the post-Oncotype dx era. An increase of 11.2 percentage points, to 69.5% from 58.3%, was observed in the proportion of patients receiving short-course compared with long-course chemotherapy (p = 0.068). The proportion of patients prescribed anthracycline-containing regimens declined in the post-Oncotype dx era (47.7% pre vs. 32.2% post, p = 0.016). The selection of more-myelosuppressive chemotherapy protocols increased in the post-Oncotype dx era (67.4% pre vs. 78.8% post, p = 0.044). Conclusions: In the present study, the availability of Oncotype dx testing was observed to influence the choice of chemotherapy type in the setting of early-stage bca. 2020 Multimed Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Oncotype dx; Recurrence Score; adjuvant chemotherapy; anthracyclines; chemotherapy choices; early-stage breast cancer; myelosuppression; personalized medicine
Authors: Soonmyung Paik; Gong Tang; Steven Shak; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Wanseop Kim; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Drew Watson; John Bryant; Joseph P Costantino; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Juhi Asad; Allyson F Jacobson; Alison Estabrook; Sharon Rosenbaum Smith; Susan K Boolbol; Sheldon M Feldman; Michael P Osborne; Kwadwo Boachie-Adjei; Wendy Twardzik; Paul I Tartter Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Soonmyung Paik; Steven Shak; Gong Tang; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Michael G Walker; Drew Watson; Taesung Park; William Hiller; Edwin R Fisher; D Lawrence Wickerham; John Bryant; Norman Wolmark Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D B Geffen; S Abu-Ghanem; N Sion-Vardy; R Braunstein; M Tokar; S Ariad; B Delgado; M Bayme; M Koretz Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Richard H de Boer; Caroline Baker; David Speakman; Calvin Y Chao; Carl Yoshizawa; G Bruce Mann Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2013-08-05 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Joseph Gligorov; Xavier B Pivot; William Jacot; Hervé L Naman; Dominique Spaeth; Jean-Louis Misset; Rémy Largillier; Jean-Loup Sautiere; Anne de Roquancourt; Christophe Pomel; Philippe Rouanet; Roman Rouzier; Frederique M Penault-Llorca Journal: Oncologist Date: 2015-06-25
Authors: N Lynn Henry; Thomas M Braun; Haythem Y Ali; Khan Munir; Samuel M Silver; David H Gorski; Tara M Breslin; Jennifer J Griggs Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: S Holt; G Bertelli; I Humphreys; W Valentine; S Durrani; D Pudney; M Rolles; M Moe; S Khawaja; Y Sharaiha; E Brinkworth; S Whelan; S Jones; H Bennett; C J Phillips Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Paul Minh Huy Tran; Lynn Kim Hoang Tran; Khaled Bin Satter; Sharad Purohit; John Nechtman; Diane I Hopkins; Bruno Dos Santos; Roni Bollag; Ravindra Kolhe; Suash Sharma; Jin Xiong She Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 6.639