Literature DB >> 31146562

Total hip arthroplasty following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation treated with a cephalomedullary nail.

A Smith1, K Denehy1, K L Ong2, E Lau3, D Hagan4, A Malkani5.   

Abstract

AIMS: Cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) are commonly used for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be used as a salvage procedure when fixation fails in these patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the complications of THA following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation using a CMN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent THA were identified from the 5% subset of Medicare Parts A/B between 2002 and 2015. A subgroup involving those with an intertrochanteric fracture that was treated using a CMN during the previous five years was identified and compared with the remaining patients who underwent THA. The length of stay (LOS) was compared using both univariate and multivariate analysis. The incidence of infection, dislocation, revision, and re-admission was compared between the two groups, using multivariate analysis adjusted for demographic, hospital, and clinical factors.
RESULTS: The Medicare data yielded 56 522 patients who underwent primary THA, of whom 369 had previously been treated with a CMN. The percentage of THAs that were undertaken between 2002 and 2005 in patients who had previously been treated with a CMN (0.346%) more than doubled between 2012 and 2015 (0.781%). The CMN group tended to be older and female, and to have a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and lower socioeconomic status. The mean LOS was 1.5 days longer (5.3 vs 3.8) in the CMN group (p < 0.0001). The incidence of complications was significantly higher in the CMN group compared with the non-CMN group: infection (6.2% vs 2.6%), dislocation (8.1% vs 4.5%), revision (8.4% vs 4.3%), revision for infection (1.1% vs 0.37%), and revision for dislocation (2.2% vs 0.6%).
CONCLUSION: The incidence of conversion to THA following failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation using a CMN continues to increase. This occurs in elderly patients with increased comorbidities. There is a significantly increased risk of infection, dislocation, and LOS in these patients. Patients with failed intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation using a CMN who require THA should be made aware of the increased risk of complications, and steps need to be taken to reduce this risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):91-96.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cephalomedullarynail; Complications; Conversion; Intertrochanteric hipfracture; Open reduction and internal fixation; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31146562     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1375.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  9 in total

Review 1.  Conversion total hip arthroplasty following extracapsular hip fracture fixation with a cephalomedullary device: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Casey M O'Connor; Joseph R Young; Benjamin Villacres Mori; Hamza Murtaza; Steven T Lyons; Cory Czajka; Thomas Bernasek
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Functional outcome of conversion total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) using uncemented distally loading femoral stem for failed fixation of proximal femoral nail - A case series.

Authors:  Hemant H Mathur; Harsh S Shah; Karthik Vishwanathan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-06

3.  Comparison of Differences in Complications and Revision After Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty from Plating vs. Nailing vs. Hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Senthil Sambandam; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Dane Wukich
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-09

4.  The Cost and Consequences of Failed Osteosynthesis of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Erdi Özdemir; Mustafa Caner Okkaoglu; Ali Teoman Evren; Yuksel Ugur Yaradilmis; Ahmet Ates; Murat Altay
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 5.  Revision surgery due to failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fracture: current state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Pei Liu; Dongxu Jin; Changqing Zhang; Youshui Gao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Preoperative Risk Prediction Models for Short-Term Revision and Death After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Data from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Mikko S Venäläinen; Valtteri J Panula; Riku Klén; Jaason J Haapakoski; Antti P Eskelinen; Mikko J Manninen; Jukka S Kettunen; Ari-Pekka Puhto; Anna I Vasara; Keijo T Mäkelä; Laura L Elo
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-01-25

7.  Hip Replacement after Proximal Femur Failed Osteosynthesis: our experience.

Authors:  Nicola Corradi; Gaetano Caruso; Ilaria Martini; Leo Massari
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-03-14

8.  Intertrochanteric fractures treated by diaphyseal support arthroplasty with hook plate vs cerclage wires only: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ghadi Abboud; Joseph Maalouly; Antonios Tawk; Dany Aouad; Rami Ayoubi; Talal Najm; Gerard El-Hajj; George El Rassi; Alexandre Nehme
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-11-17

9.  Predictive factors associated with the clinical outcome of intertrochanteric hip fracture in high-risk elderly patients treated with total hip arthroplasty versus percutaneous external fixation.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Jie Zhu; Zaiyang Liu; Yumei Zhang; Yunfei Jin; Min Wang; Xia Zhang; Kaiqi He; Yuan Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.