Literature DB >> 35992612

Functional outcome of conversion total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) using uncemented distally loading femoral stem for failed fixation of proximal femoral nail - A case series.

Hemant H Mathur1, Harsh S Shah1, Karthik Vishwanathan2.   

Abstract

Introduction and aims: There is paucity of prospective studies on conversion total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) for failed proximal femoral nailing. The objective of this study is to evaluate the functional outcome of CTHA using extensively porous coated distal loading stem for failed proximal femoral nailing. Patients and methods: Fifteen consecutively operated patients for failed proximal femoral nail treated with single stage procedure of nail extraction and CTHA were included in this prospective observational study. All patients received metal-on-polyethylene bearing with uncemented press-fit acetabular cup (Pinnacle cup; DePuy, Warsaw [IN], USA) and extensively porous coated distally loading revision stem (Solution stem; DePuy, Warsaw [IN], USA). All patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at one, three, six and more than twelve months using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The responsiveness of HHS was assessed using Effect Size (ES) and Standardised Response Mean (SRM). ES and SRM >0.8 indicates adequate responsiveness.
Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 16.9 months for the overall cohort (SD: 7.9; range: 6-28 months). The mean preoperative HHS was 32 ± 6.1, the mean HHS at six months follow-up was 89.7 ± 4.0 and the mean HHS at final follow-up of atleast one year was 93.7 ± 3.0. There was a statistically and clinically significant improvement in the HHS from preoperatively to final follow-up postoperatively (p < 0.0001). At the final follow-up, twelve patients (80%) had an excellent outcome and three patients (20%) had a good outcome as per HHS grading. The ES was 9.87 and the SRM was 8.86 thereby suggesting adequate responsiveness. One patient developed surgical site infection and another patient developed dislocation. Both were successfully treated and subsequently the patients made uneventful recovery. None of the patients required revision surgery.
Conclusion: HHS has adequate responsiveness for assessing the functional outcome of CTHA. We recommend the use of an uncemented cup and uncemented extensively porous coated, distal loading stem for failed PFN fixation in intertrochanteric hip fractures.
© 2022 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conversion total hip arthroplasty; Extensively coated revision stem; Failed proximal femoral nailing; Harris hip score; Salvage total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2022        PMID: 35992612      PMCID: PMC9382133          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  36 in total

1.  Statistics In Brief: Minimum Clinically Important Difference-Availability of Reliable Estimates.

Authors:  Mitchell Maltenfort; Claudio Díaz-Ledezma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The Popularity of Outcome Measures for Hip and Knee Arthroplasties.

Authors:  Thomas M Lovelock; Nigel S Broughton; Cylie M Williams
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Total hip arthroplasty after failed fixation of a proximal femur fracture: Analysis of 59 cases of intra- and extra-capsular fractures.

Authors:  Antoine Morice; Florian Ducellier; Pascal Bizot
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.256

5.  Responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score and the SF-36: five years after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Lih-Wen Mau; Je-Ken Chang; Jun-Wen Wang; Herng-Chia Chiu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Responsiveness and minimal important differences after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Je-Ken Chang; Chi-Yin Wong; Jun-Wen Wang; Yuan-Kun Tu; Herng-Chia Chiu; King-Teh Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Salvage hip arthroplasty after failed fixation of proximal femur fractures.

Authors:  Alexander M DeHaan; Tahnee Groat; Michael Priddy; Thomas J Ellis; Paul J Duwelius; Darin M Friess; Amer J Mirza
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Is the modified Harris hip score valid and responsive instrument for outcome assessment in the Indian population with pertrochanteric fractures?

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanathan; Keyur Akbari; Amit J Patel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-03

9.  Conversion total hip arthroplasty with a proximally modular, distal fixation reconstruction prosthesis following cephalomedullar nail failure.

Authors:  Daniel Godoy-Monzon; Fernando Diaz Dilernia; Francisco Piccaluga; Alberto Cid Casteulani; Luis Turus; Martin Buttaro
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  India Joining the World of Hip and Knee Registries: Present Status-A Leap Forward.

Authors:  Shrinand V Vaidya; Abhinav D Jogani; Jahavir A Pachore; Richard Armstrong; Chintan S Vaidya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.