Literature DB >> 33995866

The Cost and Consequences of Failed Osteosynthesis of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Matched Cohort Study.

Erdi Özdemir1, Mustafa Caner Okkaoglu1, Ali Teoman Evren1, Yuksel Ugur Yaradilmis1, Ahmet Ates1, Murat Altay1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the cost and consequences of failed osteosynthesis of intertrochanteric femur fracture (ITFF) patients and compare with primary ITFF patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 689 patients who underwent surgery due to ITFF via cephalomedullary nail. 31 patients (5.8%) had revision surgery because of osteosynthesis failure of ITFF. Each revision case included in the study was matched with four primary ITFF cases as control group based on age, gender, year of operation, type of fracture and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade. Total cost for the admission that patients underwent surgery, mortality rate at first year, infection rate, length of stay at hospital, length of stay at intensive care unit, and erythrocyte transfusion amounts were recorded from hospital registry records. Tip apex distances (TAD) were noted.
RESULTS: The mean total cost of the revision cases and primary cases was 10,027 ± 6387 and 5261 ± 1773 Turkish Liras, respectively (p < 0.001). TAD was ≥ 20 mm in 32.3% (10/31) of patients in revision group while 2.4% (3/124) of the patients in control group (p < 0.001). The mean length of stay at hospital, length of stay at intensive care unit, erythrocyte transfusion amounts, infection rate and mortality rate at first year were significantly higher in revision cases compared to matched primary control cases (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Revision surgeries due to failed osteosynthesis of ITFFs with cephalomedullary nail have at least two times higher mean total cost than primary cases. The awareness of the cost, morbidity and mortality of the revision surgeries may reduce the modifiable risk factors of osteosynthesis failure including maintenance of TAD below 20 mm, obtaining optimal lag screw position and reduction quality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, retrospective cohort study. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; Intertrochanteric femur fracture; Morbidity; Mortality; Revision

Year:  2021        PMID: 33995866      PMCID: PMC8081792          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00322-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  29 in total

1.  Increased complication rate following conversion total hip arthroplasty after cephalomedullary fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures: a multi-center study.

Authors:  Christine M Pui; Mathias P Bostrom; Geoffrey H Westrich; Craig J Della Valle; William Macaulay; Michael A Mont; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Total hip arthroplasty after prior surgical treatment of hip fracture is it always challenging?

Authors:  S M Javad Mortazavi; Max R Greenky; Orhan Bican; Patrick Kane; Javad Parvizi; William J Hozack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  C Cooper; Z A Cole; C R Holroyd; S C Earl; N C Harvey; E M Dennison; L J Melton; S R Cummings; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Total hip arthroplasty after failed treatment of proximal femur fracture.

Authors:  Tomonori Tetsunaga; Kazuo Fujiwara; Hirosuke Endo; Tomoyuki Noda; Tomoko Tetsunaga; Toru Sato; Naofumi Shiota; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Osteoporotic pertrochanteric hip fractures: management and current controversies.

Authors:  Dean G Lorich; David S Geller; Jason H Nielson
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2004

6.  Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee.

Authors:  J L Marsh; Theddy F Slongo; Julie Agel; J Scott Broderick; William Creevey; Thomas A DeCoster; Laura Prokuski; Michael S Sirkin; Bruce Ziran; Brad Henley; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip.

Authors:  M R Baumgaertner; S L Curtin; D M Lindskog; J M Keggi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Comparison of intramedullary fixation and arthroplasty for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Boyuan Nie; Dou Wu; Zhaohui Yang; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Changing trends in the mortality rate at 1-year post hip fracture - a systematic review.

Authors:  Colum Downey; Martin Kelly; John F Quinlan
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2019-03-18

10.  Hip Replacement as Alternative to Intramedullary Nail in Elderly Patients with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Bao Ju; Pei-Xun Zhang; Bao-Guo Jiang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.071

View more
  1 in total

1.  Salvage hip replacement after cut-out failure of cephalomedullary nail fixation for proximal femur fractures: a case series describing the technique and results.

Authors:  Sebastián Corró; Rafael Óleo-Taltavull; Jordi Teixidor-Serra; Jordi Tomàs-Hernández; Jordi Selga-Marsà; Yaiza García-Sánchez; Ernesto Guerra-Farfán; José-Vicente Andrés-Peiró
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.479

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.