Literature DB >> 36246028

Comparison of Differences in Complications and Revision After Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty from Plating vs. Nailing vs. Hemiarthroplasty.

Senthil Sambandam1, Varatharaj Mounasamy2, Dane Wukich2.   

Abstract

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA)after previous hip surgery increases the procedure complexity and complication rate. We investigated the complication rates following conversion to total hip arthroplasty from three hip surgeries, namely plate fixation of the intertrochanteric fracture, nailing of the trochanteric fracture, and hemiarthroplasty of the hip.
Methods: This retrospective study was conducted using the PearlDiver database (www.pearldiverinc.com, Colorado Springs) and identified all patients undergoing THA between 2010 and 2019. Among this group, we included all patients who had received one of the three procedures , hip hemiarthroplasty (CPT 27125), fixation of the intertrochanteric fracture with plates and screws (CPT 27444), or fixation of hip fracture with nail (CPT 27445) within two years of THA. We analyzed complications in these patients and compared it to the complication rate in primary THA patients. The complications analyzed were 30-day transfusion risk, 90-day surgical site infection (SSI) risk, 90-day periprosthetic fracture risk, 1-year dislocation risk, and 2-, 5-, and 10-year revision risk.
Results: A total of 118,209 patients underwent THA between 2010 and 2019. A total of 9,173, 48,326, and 31,632 patients underwent fixation with plates and screws , nailing and hemiarthroplasty respectively. We identified 71, 42, and 160 patients with hemiarthroplasty, plates & screws, and nailing, respectively, within two years of THA. 117,936 primary THA patients were used as a comparison group. The nailing group had the highest rate of transfusion risk (OR=2.34, 95% CI=1.32, 4.13, P<0.05).Furthermore, the hemiarthroplasty group had highest rate of SSI risk (OR=9.25, 95% CI=4.86, 17.63, P<0.05) and highest revision risk at 2 years (OR=10.532, 95% CI= 6.09, 18.19, P<0.05).
Conclusion: Conversion of hemiarthroplasty to THA was associated with a higher risk of infection and revision. Hence, surgeons considering primary hip hemiarthroplasty for severely comminuted intertrochanteric fracture should exercise caution, especially for active elderly patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cephalomedullary nailing; Complication; Conversion hip; Hemiarthroplasty; Plating; Revision

Year:  2022        PMID: 36246028      PMCID: PMC9527430          DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.60893.3000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  25 in total

1.  Hip Arthroplasty After Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.

Authors:  Brandon J Yuan; Matthew P Abdel; William W Cross; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Conversion vs Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Increased Cost of Care and Perioperative Complications.

Authors:  Sean P Ryan; Marcus DiLallo; David E Attarian; William A Jiranek; Thorsten M Seyler
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Hip arthroplasty after intramedullary hip screw fixation: a perioperative evaluation.

Authors:  Jesse James F Exaltacion; Stephen J Incavo; Vasilios Mathews; Brian Parsley; Philip Noble
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Hemiarthroplasty Conversion: A Comparison to Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nana O Sarpong; Matthew J Grosso; Akshay Lakra; Michael B Held; Carl L Herndon; H John Cooper
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  How Does Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Compare to Primary?

Authors:  Scott J Douglas; Ethan A Remily; Oliver C Sax; Sahir S Pervaiz; Ronald E Delanois; Aaron J Johnson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Conversion of Failed Hemiarthroplasty to Total Hip Arthroplasty Remains High Risk for Subsequent Complications.

Authors:  Nicholas M Hernandez; Kristin M Fruth; Dirk R Larson; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is it a Primary or Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mahta Baghoolizadeh; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Quantifying Blood Loss and Transfusion Risk After Primary vs Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jared M Newman; Matthew R Webb; Alison K Klika; Trevor G Murray; Wael K Barsoum; Carlos A Higuera
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  The conversion rate of bipolar hemiarthroplasty after a hip fracture to a total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sulaiman Alazzawi; Walter B Sprenger De Rover; James Brown; Ben Davis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-05-17

10.  Conversion of failed hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: a short to mid-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Amite Pankaj; Rajesh Malhotra; Surya Bhan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.