Literature DB >> 31146088

Effects of liking on visual attention in faces and paintings.

Juergen Goller1, Aleksandra Mitrovic2, Helmut Leder2.   

Abstract

The visual aesthetics of an object increases visual attention towards the object. It is argued that this relation between liking and attention is an evolutionary adaptation in sexual and natural selection. If this is the case, we would expect this relation to be domain specific, and thus, stronger for biological than for non-biological objects. To test this hypothesis, we conducted two eye-tracking studies, in which we compared the relation between liking and gaze patterns in images of biological (faces) and non-biological (paintings) stimuli. In Study 1, we presented randomly combined image pairs for 20 s in a free-viewing paradigm. Participants then selected the image they liked more in a 2-AFC task and rated the liking of each image on a Likert-scale. In Study 2, we employed the same paradigm but this time, images were combined based on pre-rated liking to ensure that images in each pair were clearly different. In both studies, we found a strong relation between liking and visual attention. Against our expectations, these effects were of similar magnitude for faces as for paintings. We conclude that the relation between liking and visual attention is not limited to biological objects but that its effects are domain general. The evolutionary function of the relation between liking and visual attention might stem from evolutionary adaptations, nonetheless, this link seems to be a rather basic phenomenon that applies across domains.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetics; Artworks; Eye tracking; Facial attractiveness; Liking; Visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31146088     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  6 in total

1.  Social reputation influences on liking and willingness-to-pay for artworks: A multimethod design investigating choice behavior along with physiological measures and motivational factors.

Authors:  Blanca T M Spee; Matthew Pelowski; Jozsef Arato; Jan Mikuni; Ulrich S Tran; Christoph Eisenegger; Helmut Leder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  The influence of visitor-based social contextual information on visitors' museum experience.

Authors:  Taeha Yi; Hao-Yun Lee; Joosun Yum; Ji-Hyun Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Task-Dependent Eye-Movement Patterns in Viewing Art.

Authors:  Nino Sharvashidze; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 0.957

4.  The Display Makes a Difference: A Mobile Eye Tracking Study on the Perception of Art Before and After a Museum's Rearrangement.

Authors:  Luise Reitstätter; Hanna Brinkmann; Thiago Santini; Eva Specker; Zoya Dare; Flora Bakondi; Anna Miscená; Enkelejda Kasneci; Helmut Leder; Raphael Rosenberg
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 0.957

Review 5.  Swipes and Saves: A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Aesthetic Assessments and Perceived Beauty of Mobile Phone Photographs.

Authors:  Helmut Leder; Jussi Hakala; Veli-Tapani Peltoketo; Christian Valuch; Matthew Pelowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-28

6.  How do people distribute their attention while observing The Night Watch?

Authors:  Joost C F de Winter; Dimitra Dodou; Wilbert Tabone
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 1.695

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.