Literature DB >> 33828792

The Display Makes a Difference: A Mobile Eye Tracking Study on the Perception of Art Before and After a Museum's Rearrangement.

Luise Reitstätter, Hanna Brinkmann, Thiago Santini1, Eva Specker, Zoya Dare, Flora Bakondi, Anna Miscená, Enkelejda Kasneci1, Helmut Leder, Raphael Rosenberg.   

Abstract

There is increasing awareness that the perception of art is affected by the way it is presented. In 2018, the Austrian Gallery Belvedere redisplayed its permanent collection. Our multidisciplinary team seized this opportunity to investigate the viewing behavior of specific artworks both before and after the museum's rearrangement. In contrast to previous mobile eye tracking (MET) studies in museums, this study benefits from the comparison of two realistic display conditions (without any research interference), an unconstrained study design (working with regular museum visitors), and a large data sample (comprising 259 participants). We employed a mixed-method approach that combined mobile eye tracking, subjective mapping (a drawing task in conjunction with an open interview), and a questionnaire in order to relate gaze patterns to processes of meaning-making. Our results show that the new display made a difference in that it 1) generally increased the viewing times of the artworks; 2) clearly extended the reading times of labels; and 3) deepened visitors' engagement with the artworks in their exhibition reflections. In contrast, interest in specific artworks and art form preferences proved to be robust and independent of presentation modes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  art perception; attention; exhibition display; mobile eye tracking; museum studies; social influences; usability; visitor research

Year:  2020        PMID: 33828792      PMCID: PMC7962802          DOI: 10.16910/jemr.13.2.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eye Mov Res        ISSN: 1995-8692            Impact factor:   0.957


  14 in total

1.  Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings.

Authors:  Phil A Russell
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2003-02

2.  In the white cube: museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art.

Authors:  David Brieber; Marcos Nadal; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2014-12-03

Review 3.  Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates.

Authors:  Matthew Pelowski; Patrick S Markey; Michael Forster; Gernot Gerger; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Perception of direct vs. averted gaze in portrait paintings: An fMRI and eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Ladislav Kesner; Dominika Grygarová; Iveta Fajnerová; Jiří Lukavský; Tereza Nekovářová; Jaroslav Tintěra; Yuliya Zaytseva; Jiří Horáček
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Experiencing art: the influence of expertise and painting abstraction level.

Authors:  Elina Pihko; Anne Virtanen; Veli-Matti Saarinen; Sebastian Pannasch; Lotta Hirvenkari; Timo Tossavainen; Arto Haapala; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions.

Authors:  Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-02-01

7.  Capturing Aesthetic Experiences With Installation Art: An Empirical Assessment of Emotion, Evaluations, and Mobile Eye Tracking in Olafur Eliasson's "Baroque, Baroque!"

Authors:  Matthew Pelowski; Helmut Leder; Vanessa Mitschke; Eva Specker; Gernot Gerger; Pablo P L Tinio; Elena Vaporova; Till Bieg; Agnes Husslein-Arco
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-06

8.  Art in time and space: context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time.

Authors:  David Brieber; Marcos Nadal; Helmut Leder; Raphael Rosenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The impact of slippage on the data quality of head-worn eye trackers.

Authors:  Diederick C Niehorster; Thiago Santini; Roy S Hessels; Ignace T C Hooge; Enkelejda Kasneci; Marcus Nyström
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-06

10.  Is the eye-movement field confused about fixations and saccades? A survey among 124 researchers.

Authors:  Roy S Hessels; Diederick C Niehorster; Marcus Nyström; Richard Andersson; Ignace T C Hooge
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Open Gallery for Arts Research (OGAR): An open-source tool for studying the psychology of virtual art museum visits.

Authors:  Rebekah M Rodriguez-Boerwinkle; Martin J Boerwinkle; Paul J Silvia
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-25

2.  How do people distribute their attention while observing The Night Watch?

Authors:  Joost C F de Winter; Dimitra Dodou; Wilbert Tabone
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 1.695

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.