PURPOSE: End-of-life (EOL) chemotherapy has been described as the most widespread, wasteful, and unnecessary practice in oncology, with benchmarking aimed to reduce physician use of chemotherapy within 14 days of EOL. We evaluated the recent transformation of EOL chemotherapy and targeted therapy practices nationally. METHODS: In patients older than 65 years of age who died as a result of breast (n = 19,887), lung (n = 79,613), colorectal (n = 29,844), or prostate (n = 17,910) cancer between 2007 and 2013, we evaluated the guideline-benchmarked measure of chemotherapy use within 14 days of EOL in SEER-Medicare. Comparison outcomes were nonbenchmarked measures of chemotherapy and targeted therapy across time points within 6 months of EOL. Cochran-Armitage test was used to evaluate temporal trends. Multilevel logistic models and intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate variation in EOL chemotherapy use at the physician level. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2013, chemotherapy within 14 days of EOL declined from 6.7% to 4.9% of patients (Ptrend < .001; ∆ = -1.8%). Similar declines occurred for chemotherapy within 1 month (Ptrend < .001; ∆ = -1.8%) and 2 months (Ptrend < .001; ∆ = -1.3%) of EOL. In contrast, chemotherapy within 4 to 6 months of EOL rose (Ptrend ≤ .04; ∆ = 0.7% to 1.7%), and 43.0% of all patients received chemotherapy within 6 months of EOL. Frequency of targeted therapy use across all time points within 6 months of EOL was stable to marginally rising from 2007 to 2013 (Ptrend = .09 to .82; ∆ = -0.2% to 1.8%); overall, 1.2% received targeted therapy within 14 days and 3.6% within 1 month of EOL. By 2013, 13.2% of patients received any targeted therapy within 6 months of EOL. In a multilevel model, 5.19% (intraclass correlation coefficient) of variation in 14-day EOL chemotherapy was attributed to the physician level. CONCLUSION: With national benchmarking, chemotherapy within 14 days of EOL successfully declined to less than 5%, with comprehensive benchmark uptake by physicians. Results may inform current strategies to help to achieve high-value EOL oncology practice.
PURPOSE: End-of-life (EOL) chemotherapy has been described as the most widespread, wasteful, and unnecessary practice in oncology, with benchmarking aimed to reduce physician use of chemotherapy within 14 days of EOL. We evaluated the recent transformation of EOL chemotherapy and targeted therapy practices nationally. METHODS: In patients older than 65 years of age who died as a result of breast (n = 19,887), lung (n = 79,613), colorectal (n = 29,844), or prostate (n = 17,910) cancer between 2007 and 2013, we evaluated the guideline-benchmarked measure of chemotherapy use within 14 days of EOL in SEER-Medicare. Comparison outcomes were nonbenchmarked measures of chemotherapy and targeted therapy across time points within 6 months of EOL. Cochran-Armitage test was used to evaluate temporal trends. Multilevel logistic models and intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate variation in EOL chemotherapy use at the physician level. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2013, chemotherapy within 14 days of EOL declined from 6.7% to 4.9% of patients (Ptrend < .001; ∆ = -1.8%). Similar declines occurred for chemotherapy within 1 month (Ptrend < .001; ∆ = -1.8%) and 2 months (Ptrend < .001; ∆ = -1.3%) of EOL. In contrast, chemotherapy within 4 to 6 months of EOL rose (Ptrend ≤ .04; ∆ = 0.7% to 1.7%), and 43.0% of all patients received chemotherapy within 6 months of EOL. Frequency of targeted therapy use across all time points within 6 months of EOL was stable to marginally rising from 2007 to 2013 (Ptrend = .09 to .82; ∆ = -0.2% to 1.8%); overall, 1.2% received targeted therapy within 14 days and 3.6% within 1 month of EOL. By 2013, 13.2% of patients received any targeted therapy within 6 months of EOL. In a multilevel model, 5.19% (intraclass correlation coefficient) of variation in 14-day EOL chemotherapy was attributed to the physician level. CONCLUSION: With national benchmarking, chemotherapy within 14 days of EOL successfully declined to less than 5%, with comprehensive benchmark uptake by physicians. Results may inform current strategies to help to achieve high-value EOL oncology practice.
Authors: Jennifer K Litton; Hope S Rugo; Johannes Ettl; Sara A Hurvitz; Anthony Gonçalves; Kyung-Hun Lee; Louis Fehrenbacher; Rinat Yerushalmi; Lida A Mina; Miguel Martin; Henri Roché; Young-Hyuck Im; Ruben G W Quek; Denka Markova; Iulia C Tudor; Alison L Hannah; Wolfgang Eiermann; Joanne L Blum Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Melissa K Accordino; Jason D Wright; Sowmya Vasan; Alfred I Neugut; Tal Gross; Grace C Hillyer; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Alona Muzikansky; Emily R Gallagher; Sonal Admane; Vicki A Jackson; Constance M Dahlin; Craig D Blinderman; Juliet Jacobsen; William F Pirl; J Andrew Billings; Thomas J Lynch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Ettl; R G W Quek; K-H Lee; H S Rugo; S Hurvitz; A Gonçalves; L Fehrenbacher; R Yerushalmi; L A Mina; M Martin; H Roché; Y-H Im; D Markova; H Bhattacharyya; A L Hannah; W Eiermann; J L Blum; J K Litton Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Isabel J Boero; Erin F Gillespie; Jiayi Hou; Anthony J Paravati; Ellen Kim; John P Einck; Catheryn Yashar; Loren K Mell; James D Murphy Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Holly G Prigerson; Yuhua Bao; Manish A Shah; M Elizabeth Paulk; Thomas W LeBlanc; Bryan J Schneider; Melissa M Garrido; M Carrington Reid; David A Berlin; Kerin B Adelson; Alfred I Neugut; Paul K Maciejewski Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Allison Lipitz-Snyderman; Camelia S Sima; Coral L Atoria; Elena B Elkin; Christopher Anderson; Victoria Blinder; Chiaojung Jillian Tsai; Katherine S Panageas; Peter B Bach Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Melisa L Wong; Stuart M Lichtman; Gary R Morrow; John Simmons; Tomma Hargraves; Cary P Gross; Jennifer L Lund; Lisa M Lowenstein; Louise C Walter; Cara L McDermott; Supriya G Mohile; Harvey Jay Cohen Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Lari Wenzel; Helen Q Huang; David Cella; Chelsea O McKinney; Michael A Zevon; Jason A LaChance; Joan L Walker; Ritu Salani; Susan C Modesitt; Robert T Morris; William H Bradley; Matthew P Boente; Vivian E von Gruenigen Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Ali Raza Khaki; Shasank Chennupati; Catherine Fedorenko; Li Li; Qin Sun; Petros Grivas; Scott D Ramsey; Stephen M Schwartz; Veena Shankaran Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-05-19