Literature DB >> 26203912

Chemotherapy Use, Performance Status, and Quality of Life at the End of Life.

Holly G Prigerson1, Yuhua Bao2, Manish A Shah3, M Elizabeth Paulk4, Thomas W LeBlanc5, Bryan J Schneider6, Melissa M Garrido7, M Carrington Reid8, David A Berlin9, Kerin B Adelson10, Alfred I Neugut11, Paul K Maciejewski12.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Although many patients with end-stage cancer are offered chemotherapy to improve quality of life (QOL), the association between chemotherapy and QOL amid progressive metastatic disease has not been well-studied. American Society for Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend palliative chemotherapy only for solid tumor patients with good performance status.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between chemotherapy use and QOL near death (QOD) as a function of patients' performance status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multi-institutional, longitudinal cohort study of patients with end-stage cancer recruited between September 2002 and February 2008. Chemotherapy use (n = 158 [50.6%]) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status were assessed at baseline (median = 3.8 months before death) and patients with progressive metastatic cancer (N = 312) following at least 1 chemotherapy regimen were followed prospectively until death at 6 outpatient oncology clinics in the United States. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patient QOD was determined using validated caregiver ratings of patients' physical and mental distress in their final week.
RESULTS: Chemotherapy use was not associated with patient survival controlling for clinical setting and patients' performance status. Among patients with good (ECOG score = 1) baseline performance status, chemotherapy use compared with nonuse was associated with worse QOD (odds ratio [OR], 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.75; P = .01). Baseline chemotherapy use was not associated with QOD among patients with moderate (ECOG score = 2) baseline performance status (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.51-2.21; P = .87) or poor (ECOG score = 3) baseline performance status (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.46-3.89; P = .59). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although palliative chemotherapy is used to improve QOL for patients with end-stage cancer, its use did not improve QOD for patients with moderate or poor performance status and worsened QOD for patients with good performance status. The QOD in patients with end-stage cancer is not improved, and can be harmed, by chemotherapy use near death, even in patients with good performance status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26203912      PMCID: PMC4828728          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  28 in total

1.  Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy.

Authors:  Sean R Tunis; Daniel B Stryer; Carolyn M Clancy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Factors important to patients' quality of life at the end of life.

Authors:  Baohui Zhang; Matthew E Nilsson; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-08-13

3.  Randomized phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  S E Jones; J Erban; B Overmoyer; G T Budd; L Hutchins; E Lower; L Laufman; S Sundaram; W J Urba; K I Pritchard; R Mennel; D Richards; S Olsen; M L Meyers; P M Ravdin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients.

Authors:  E Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study.

Authors:  Javier Cortes; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; David Loesch; Joanne L Blum; Linda T Vahdat; Katarina Petrakova; Philippe Chollet; Alexey Manikas; Veronique Diéras; Thierry Delozier; Vladimir Vladimirov; Fatima Cardoso; Han Koh; Philippe Bougnoux; Corina E Dutcus; Seth Seegobin; Denis Mir; Nicole Meneses; Jantien Wanders; Chris Twelves
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The influence of patients' quality of life at the end of life on bereaved caregivers' suicidal ideation.

Authors:  Caroline H Abbott; Holly G Prigerson; Paul K Maciejewski
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Nonanatomic prognostic factors in carcinoma of the lung: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  J L Pater; M Loeb
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Characterization of patients receiving palliative chemo- and radiotherapy during end of life at a regional cancer center in Norway.

Authors:  Malin Anshushaug; Mari Aas Gynnild; Stein Kaasa; Anne Kvikstad; Bjørn H Grønberg
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.089

10.  Delivering maximum clinical benefit at an affordable price: engaging stakeholders in cancer care.

Authors:  Ronan J Kelly; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  170 in total

1.  End-of-life care in patients with primary malignant brain tumors: early is better.

Authors:  Tobias Walbert; Andrea Pace
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Quality of End-of-Life Care and Its Association with Nurse Practice Environments in U.S. Hospitals.

Authors:  Karen B Lasater; Douglas M Sloane; Matthew D McHugh; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-12-02       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Assessing the Impact of a Novel Integrated Palliative Care and Medical Oncology Inpatient Service on Health Care Utilization before Hospice Enrollment.

Authors:  Emily M Ray; Richard F Riedel; Thomas W LeBlanc; Christel N Rushing; Anthony N Galanos
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 4.  "The Talk:" Discussing Hospice Care.

Authors:  Christine D Hudak; Charles von Gunten
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  The Intensive Care Medicine research agenda on critically ill oncology and hematology patients.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Peter Schellongowski; Michael Darmon; Philippe R Bauer; Dominique Benoit; Pieter Depuydt; Jigeeshu V Divatia; Virginie Lemiale; Maarten van Vliet; Anne-Pascale Meert; Djamel Mokart; Stephen M Pastores; Anders Perner; Frédéric Pène; Peter Pickkers; Kathryn A Puxty; Francois Vincent; Jorge Salluh; Ayman O Soubani; Massimo Antonelli; Thomas Staudinger; Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Marcio Soares
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  End-of-Life Services Among Patients With Cancer: Evidence From Cancer Registry Records Linked With Commercial Health Insurance Claims.

Authors:  Cara L McDermott; Catherine Fedorenko; Karma Kreizenbeck; Qin Sun; Bruce Smith; J Randall Curtis; Ted Conklin; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Homing in on the Social: System-Level Influences on Overly Aggressive Treatments at the End of Life.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dzeng; Daniel Dohan; J Randall Curtis; Thomas J Smith; Alessandra Colaianni; Christine S Ritchie
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  What determines the timing of discussions on forgoing anticancer treatment? A national survey of medical oncologists.

Authors:  Masanori Mori; Chikako Shimizu; Asao Ogawa; Takuji Okusaka; Saran Yoshida; Tatsuya Morita
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Palliative Care and Symptom Management in Older Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Koshy Alexander; Jessica Goldberg; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 3.076

10.  Patient preference and decision-making for initiating metastatic colorectal cancer medical treatment.

Authors:  Alex Z Fu; Kristi D Graves; Roxanne E Jensen; John L Marshall; Margaret Formoso; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.