Fauzia Riaz1,2, Geliang Gan3,4, Fangyong Li3,4, Amy J Davidoff1,3, Kerin B Adelson1,3, Carolyn J Presley1,5, Blythe J Adamson6, Pooja Shaw6, Ravi B Parikh7, Ronac Mamtani7, Cary P Gross1,3. 1. Cancer Outcomes Public Policy and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 2. Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA. 3. Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT. 4. Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, New Haven, CT. 5. The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center and The James Cancer Hospital/Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH. 6. Flatiron Health, New York, NY. 7. Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: As immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the care of patients with cancer, it is unclear whether treatment at the end of life (EOL) has changed. Because aggressive therapy at the EOL is associated with increased costs and patient distress, we explored the association between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of ICIs and treatment patterns at the EOL. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational study using patient-level data from a nationwide electronic health record-derived database. Patients had advanced melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; cancer types with an ICI indication), or microsatellite stable (MSS) colon cancer (a cancer type without an ICI indication) and died between 2013 and 2017. We calculated annual proportions of decedents who received systemic cancer therapy in the final 30 days of life, using logistic regression to model the association between the post-ICI FDA approval time and use of systemic therapy at the EOL, adjusting for patient characteristics. We assessed the use of chemotherapy or targeted/biologic therapies at the EOL, before and after FDA approval of ICIs using Pearson chi-square test. RESULTS: There was an increase in use of EOL systemic cancer therapy in the post-ICI approval period for both melanoma (33.9% to 43.2%; P < .001) and NSCLC (37.4% to 40.3%; P < .001), with no significant change in use of systemic therapy in MSS colon cancer. After FDA approval of ICIs, patients with NSCLC and melanoma had a decrease in the use of chemotherapy, with a concomitant increase in use of ICIs at the EOL. CONCLUSION: The adoption of ICIs was associated with a substantive increase in the use of systemic therapy at the EOL in melanoma and a smaller yet significant increase in NSCLC.
PURPOSE: As immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the care of patients with cancer, it is unclear whether treatment at the end of life (EOL) has changed. Because aggressive therapy at the EOL is associated with increased costs and patient distress, we explored the association between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of ICIs and treatment patterns at the EOL. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational study using patient-level data from a nationwide electronic health record-derived database. Patients had advanced melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; cancer types with an ICI indication), or microsatellite stable (MSS) colon cancer (a cancer type without an ICI indication) and died between 2013 and 2017. We calculated annual proportions of decedents who received systemic cancer therapy in the final 30 days of life, using logistic regression to model the association between the post-ICI FDA approval time and use of systemic therapy at the EOL, adjusting for patient characteristics. We assessed the use of chemotherapy or targeted/biologic therapies at the EOL, before and after FDA approval of ICIs using Pearson chi-square test. RESULTS: There was an increase in use of EOL systemic cancer therapy in the post-ICI approval period for both melanoma (33.9% to 43.2%; P < .001) and NSCLC (37.4% to 40.3%; P < .001), with no significant change in use of systemic therapy in MSS colon cancer. After FDA approval of ICIs, patients with NSCLC and melanoma had a decrease in the use of chemotherapy, with a concomitant increase in use of ICIs at the EOL. CONCLUSION: The adoption of ICIs was associated with a substantive increase in the use of systemic therapy at the EOL in melanoma and a smaller yet significant increase in NSCLC.
Authors: Craig C Earle; Elyse R Park; Bonnie Lai; Jane C Weeks; John Z Ayanian; Susan Block Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lowell E Schnipper; Thomas J Smith; Derek Raghavan; Douglas W Blayney; Patricia A Ganz; Therese Marie Mulvey; Dana S Wollins Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joshua Kraut; Kathi Mooney; John W Sweetenham; Ray D Page; Kerin Adelson; Vineeta Agarwala; Kristen L Fessele; H James Hamrick; Irene Kaganman; James Martineau; Amy P Abernethy; Neal J Meropol Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: R E Pataky; W Y Cheung; C de Oliveira; K E Bremner; K K W Chan; J S Hoch; M D Krahn; S J Peacock Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: J Naidoo; D B Page; B T Li; L C Connell; K Schindler; M E Lacouture; M A Postow; J D Wolchok Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Shi-Yi Wang; Jane Hall; Craig E Pollack; Kerin Adelson; Elizabeth H Bradley; Jessica B Long; Cary P Gross Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Holly G Prigerson; Yuhua Bao; Manish A Shah; M Elizabeth Paulk; Thomas W LeBlanc; Bryan J Schneider; Melissa M Garrido; M Carrington Reid; David A Berlin; Kerin B Adelson; Alfred I Neugut; Paul K Maciejewski Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Ali Raza Khaki; Shasank Chennupati; Catherine Fedorenko; Li Li; Qin Sun; Petros Grivas; Scott D Ramsey; Stephen M Schwartz; Veena Shankaran Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-05-19
Authors: Kartik Sehgal; Ritu R Gill; Page Widick; Poorva Bindal; Danielle C McDonald; Meghan Shea; Deepa Rangachari; Daniel B Costa Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-02-01