| Literature DB >> 31137512 |
Yan Liu1, Dongfeng Ji2, Robert Turgeon3, Jine Chen4, Tianbao Lin5, Jing Huang6, Jie Luo7, Yan Zhu8, Cankui Zhang9, Zhiqiang Lv10.
Abstract
Intensive investigations have been conducted on the effect of sole drought or salinity stress on the growth of plants. However, there is relatively little knowledge on how plants, particularly woody species, respond to a combination of these two stresses although these stresses can simultaneously occur in the field. In this study, mulberry, an economically important resource for traditional medicine, and the sole food of domestiEntities:
Keywords: TMT proteomics; mulberry; stressed leaves; stressed roots; sugar metabolism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31137512 PMCID: PMC6566768 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20102486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Physiological responses of mulberry to a combination of salt and drought stress. (A) Growth phenotype of mulberry seedlings at the end of a combination of salt and drought stress. These plants were treated with 200 mM NaCl for two days and continued dehydration for two weeks. Scale bar = 5 cm. (B) Chlorophyll content (Chl-a, Chl-b, and carotenoid, mg. g−1.FW) in both the control (Con) and salt-drought stress groups (S-D). (C) Chlorophyll fluorescence parameter Fv/Fm in both Con and S-D group. (D) Leaf electrolyte leakage (%) in Con and S-D group. (E) Leaf water content (%) in both Con and S-D group. The values of each column are the means ± S.D. of three biological replicates. Asterisks labeled above the columns indicate a significant difference at the p ≤ 0.05 level by Duncan’s test using SPSS software (version 22.0).
Changes in R/S, C/N and ion content in stressed mulberry tissues.
| Samples | R/S Ratio 1 | Total C (%) | Total N (%) | C/N Ratio | Na+ (g/Kg) | K+ (g/Kg) | Ca2+ (g/Kg) | K+/Na+ Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Leaf | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 40.66 ± 0.20 | 4.90 ± 0.09 | 8.29 ± 0.18 | 0.45 ± 0.05 | 19.94 ± 0.46 | 20.75 ±0.85 | 44.59 ± 4.17 |
| Root | 40.11 ± 0.09 | 4.33 ± 0.06 | 9.26 ± 0.11 | 0.81 ± 0.08 | 17.43 ± 1.85 | 2.49 ± 0.17 | 21.71 ± 4.25 | ||
|
| Leaf | 0.26 ± 0.04 ** | 38.84 ± 0.21 ** | 4.41 ± 0.05 * | 8.81 ± 0.14 | 1.43 ± 0.12 ** | 21.68 ± 0.11 | 25.56 ± 1.14 ** | 15.20 ± 1.22 ** |
| Root | 41.84 ± 0.21 ** | 3.91 ± 0.21 | 10.73 ± 0.52 | 1.58 ± 0.01 ** | 16.23 ± 1.14 | 1.94 ± 0.10 ** | 10.28 ± 0.70 ** | ||
1 R/S ratio stands for dry weigh biomass comparison between the roots and shoots. Data from stressed samples were compared with that from control group. Significant differences with p < 0.05 were marked with *, while differences with p < 0.01 were marked with **.
Primary results for identified proteins from mulberry leaves and roots.
| Protein Category | Leaf | Root |
|---|---|---|
| Total spectra | 284,360 | 309,348 |
| Peptides identified | 49,758 | 64,317 |
| Protein identified | 3615 | 4768 |
| Number of unique proteins | 942 | 2095 |
| Combined distinct protein IDs (total/overlap) from two tissues | 5710/2673 | |
| Total proteins IDs with TMT ratio | 2944 (81.44%) | 4005 (84.00%) |
| Unique proteins with TMT ratio | 790 | 1851 |
| Combined distinct protein IDs with TMT ratio (total/overlap) from two tissues | 4795/2154 | |
Figure 2Venn diagram of differentially expressed proteins identified at three different treatment time points.
Figure 3Ontology classification of differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in the S-D stressed mulberry leaves (A) and roots (B). The X-axis indicates GO terms, while the Y-axis indicates the percentage of DEPs.
Figure 4Subcellular localization (upper) and functional categories according to clusters of orthologous groups of DEPs (bottom) in the S-D stressed mulberry leaves (A,C) and roots (B,D).
Figure 5Functional classifications of DEPs in stressed leaves (A) and roots (B) based on KEGG pathways. The X-axis indicates the number of DEGs involved in these pathways. The Y-axis indicates the different pathways.
Figure 6Comparison and validation of two candidate proteins by western blot analysis. Western blot analysis showed changes in APX (ascorbate peroxidase), ATPSb (ATP synthase subunit b), and actin as the internal control. Three replicates were conducted.
Figure 7Schematic representation of sugar and glycogen synthesis in mulberry under stress conditions. FK, fructokinase; β Fruct, beta-fructofuranosidase; HK, hexokinase; a-Gal, alpha-galactosidase; GlgC, glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase; a-GLS, alpha-glucosidase; GS, galactinol synthase; RS, raffinose synthase; SBE, 1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme; SS, Starch synthase; SuSy, sucrose synthesis; UGE, UDP-glucose 4-epimerase; the upregulated genes are marked in red. (Color figure online).