| Literature DB >> 26951880 |
Sheikh Hasna Habib1, Hossain Kausar2, Halimi Mohd Saud3.
Abstract
Salinity is a major environmental stress that limits crop production worldwide. In this study, we characterized plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containingEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26951880 PMCID: PMC4756578 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6284547
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1(a) Agarose gel electrophoresis of 16S rDNA PCR products of bacterial isolates. Lane M: 100 bP DNA ladder. Lanes 1 and 2: bacterial isolates UPMR2 and UPMR18. (b) The neighbor-joining tree shows the phylogenetic relationship of the isolates UPMR2 and UPMR18 with related isolates from the NCBI database.
Primer pairs used for RT-PCR in this study.
| NCBI accession number | Primer name | Sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
| X55749 | Actin | F: CTGGTGGTGCAACAACCTTA |
|
| ||
| AB041343 | APX | F: ACCAATTGGCTGGTGTTGTT |
|
| ||
| AY442179 | CAT | F: TGCCCTTCTATTGTGGTTCC |
|
| ||
| X76533 | GR | F: GGATCCTCATACGGTGGATG |
|
| ||
| DQ512964 | DHAR | F: AGGTGAACCCAGAAGGGAAA |
Effect of PGPR inoculation on germination of okra seeds under salt stress.
| Treatments | Salinity levels | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 mM | 25 mM | 50 mM | 75 mM | 100 mM | |
| Control | 100 | 100 | 100 | 70b | 50b |
|
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100a | 80a |
|
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100a | 80a |
| Coinoculation of UPMR2 & UPMR18 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100a | 80a |
Means within columns with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05.
Effect of PGPR inoculation on growth attributes of okra plants under salinity stress.
| Treatment | LFW/plant | LDW/plant | SFW/plant | SDW/plant | RFW/plant | RDW/plant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g) | (g) | (g) | (g) | (g) | (g) | |
| T0 | 2.63 ± 0.13c | 0.26 ± 0.03c | 1.57 ± 0.14c | 0.14 ± 0.02c | 0.34 ± 0.03d | 0.04 ± 0.01b |
| T1 | 2.83 ± 0.15c | 0.28 ± 0.03c | 1.90 ± 0.08b | 0.16 ± 0.02c | 0.47 ± 0.05c | 0.03 ± 0.00b |
| T2 | 3.92 ± 0.17a | 0.46 ± 0.01a | 2.56 ± 0.29a | 0.28 ± 0.01a | 0.79 ± 0.08a | 0.07 ± 0.02a |
| T3 | 3.28 ± 0.25b | 0.37 ± 0.01b | 2.65 ± 0.07a | 0.22 ± 0.01b | 0.65 ± 0.06b | 0.06 ± 0.00a |
T0: noninoculated salt treated plants, T1: UPMR2 inoculated salt treated plants, T2: UPMR18 inoculated salt treated plants, and T3: UPMR2 and UPMR18 inoculated salt treated plants. LFW: leaf fresh weight, LDW: leaf dry weight, SFW: shoot fresh weight, SDW: shoot dry weight, RFW: root fresh weight, and RDW: root dry weight. Means within columns with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 2Effect of PGPR inoculation on chlorophyll content of okra leaves under salt stress. T0: noninoculated salt treated plants, T1: UPMR2 inoculated salt treated plants, T2: UPMR18 inoculated salt treated plants, and T3; both UPMR2 and UPMR18 inoculated salt treated plants. Error bars refer to standard error of means of four replicates. Means within columns with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 3Effect of PGPR inoculation on antioxidant enzymes activities in okra leaves under salt stress. T0: noninoculated salt treated plants, T1: UPMR2 inoculated salt treated plants, T2: UPMR18 inoculated salt treated plants, and T3: both UPMR2 and UPMR18 inoculated salt treated plants. Error bars refer to standard error of means of four replicates. APX: ascorbate peroxidase, CAT: catalase, and SOD: superoxide dismutase. Means within columns with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 4Effect of PGPR inoculation on DHAR, GR, APX, and CAT transcript levels by semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of okra leaves under salt stress. T0: noninoculated salt treated plants, T1: UPMR2 inoculated salt treated plants, T2: UPMR18 inoculated salt treated plants, and T3: both UPMR2 and UPMR18 inoculated salt treated plants. Actin: positive control, APX: ascorbate peroxidase, CAT: catalase, GR: glutathione reductase, and DHAR: dehydroascorbate reductase.