Literature DB >> 17327847

Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry.

Joshua E Elias1, Steven P Gygi.   

Abstract

Liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has become the preferred method for conducting large-scale surveys of proteomes. Automated interpretation of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) spectra can be problematic, however, for a variety of reasons. As most sequence search engines return results even for 'unmatchable' spectra, proteome researchers must devise ways to distinguish correct from incorrect peptide identifications. The target-decoy search strategy represents a straightforward and effective way to manage this effort. Despite the apparent simplicity of this method, some controversy surrounds its successful application. Here we clarify our preferred methodology by addressing four issues based on observed decoy hit frequencies: (i) the major assumptions made with this database search strategy are reasonable; (ii) concatenated target-decoy database searches are preferable to separate target and decoy database searches; (iii) the theoretical error associated with target-decoy false positive (FP) rate measurements can be estimated; and (iv) alternate methods for constructing decoy databases are similarly effective once certain considerations are taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17327847     DOI: 10.1038/nmeth1019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN: 1548-7091            Impact factor:   28.547


  1680 in total

1.  UBE2O remodels the proteome during terminal erythroid differentiation.

Authors:  Anthony T Nguyen; Miguel A Prado; Paul J Schmidt; Anoop K Sendamarai; Joshua T Wilson-Grady; Mingwei Min; Dean R Campagna; Geng Tian; Yuan Shi; Verena Dederer; Mona Kawan; Nathalie Kuehnle; Joao A Paulo; Yu Yao; Mitchell J Weiss; Monica J Justice; Steven P Gygi; Mark D Fleming; Daniel Finley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Analysis of ubiquitinated proteome by quantitative mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Chan Hyun Na; Junmin Peng
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

3.  Proteomic analysis of laser microdissected melanoma cells from skin organ cultures.

Authors:  Brian L Hood; Jelena Grahovac; Melanie S Flint; Mai Sun; Nuno Charro; Dorothea Becker; Alan Wells; Thomas P Conrads
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Identification of best indicators of peptide-spectrum match using a permutation resampling approach.

Authors:  Malik N Akhtar; Bruce R Southey; Per E Andrén; Jonathan V Sweedler; Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.122

5.  Quantitative peptidomics study reveals that a wound-induced peptide from PR-1 regulates immune signaling in tomato.

Authors:  Ying-Lan Chen; Chi-Ying Lee; Kai-Tan Cheng; Wei-Hung Chang; Rong-Nan Huang; Hong Gil Nam; Yet-Ran Chen
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  A high-confidence interaction map identifies SIRT1 as a mediator of acetylation of USP22 and the SAGA coactivator complex.

Authors:  Sean M Armour; Eric J Bennett; Craig R Braun; Xiao-Yong Zhang; Steven B McMahon; Steven P Gygi; J Wade Harper; David A Sinclair
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  A ranking-based scoring function for peptide-spectrum matches.

Authors:  Ari M Frank
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  MassMatrix: a database search program for rapid characterization of proteins and peptides from tandem mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Hua Xu; Michael A Freitas
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 9.  Identification and Quantification of Proteoforms by Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Leah V Schaffer; Robert J Millikin; Rachel M Miller; Lissa C Anderson; Ryan T Fellers; Ying Ge; Neil L Kelleher; Richard D LeDuc; Xiaowen Liu; Samuel H Payne; Liangliang Sun; Paul M Thomas; Trisha Tucholski; Zhe Wang; Si Wu; Zhijie Wu; Dahang Yu; Michael R Shortreed; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  The standard protein mix database: a diverse data set to assist in the production of improved Peptide and protein identification software tools.

Authors:  John Klimek; James S Eddes; Laura Hohmann; Jennifer Jackson; Amelia Peterson; Simon Letarte; Philip R Gafken; Jonathan E Katz; Parag Mallick; Hookeun Lee; Alexander Schmidt; Reto Ossola; Jimmy K Eng; Ruedi Aebersold; Daniel B Martin
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.