| Literature DB >> 31096705 |
Jian Cao1,2, Nan Zhang3,4,5, Ziyi Wang6,7, Jingjing Su8,9, Jing Yang10,11, Jiabing Han12, Yongxing Zhao13,14,15.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a complicated autoimmune disease. The clinical applications of etanercept (EN), a TNF-α inhibitor, can efficiently halt the development of RA. EN is mainly administrated by subcutaneous injection, which may cause low compliance, side effects, and infection risk. In this study, a hyaluronic acid crosslinked microneedle system (MN) was constructed as the transdermal alternative to deliver EN. We describe the formulation, fabrication, characterization, and transdermal insertion study of MN. In vitro bioactivity of EN was conducted and analyzed by dynamic light scattering and circular dichroism spectrum. In vivo evaluation of MN was studied on adjuvant-induced arthritis mice. The MN possessed sufficient mechanical strength, good biocompatibility, little influence on the bioactivity of EN, and high anti-inflammatory efficacy. This work represents a successful example of delivering macromolecule therapeutic treatment by MN for RA treatment. The transdermal delivery of EN by MN offers a new treatment option for RA patients.Entities:
Keywords: drug delivery; etanercept; hyaluronic acid; microneedle; rheumatoid arthritis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31096705 PMCID: PMC6572071 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11050235
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the concept. After the application of microneedle system (MN) on the dorsal skin of mice, etanercept (EN) is released from MN and absorbed by tissue blood capillary. In the arthritis tissue, EN takes effects by blocking the binding of TNF-α and TNF receptor.
Figure 2(A) Nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectrum of HA and mHA; the microscope images (B,C) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (D,E) of MN.
Figure 3(A) Examination of the failure force per needle; the separated mouse dorsum skin (B) and trypan blue stained skin image (C); (D) H&E-stained cross-section of inserted skin by MN; (E) MN image after application to the mouse skin for 90 min; (F) skin recovery images at 0 min, 60 min, and 120 min after MN treatment.
Figure 4Size distribution by intensity (A) and zeta potential distribution (B) of EN after the exposure to Ultra Violet (UV) light for 0 s, 60 s, 120 s, and 180 s; (C) the table of size, intensity, polydispersity index, and zeta potential of the listed samples; (D) circular dichroism spectrum of listed samples; (E) a standard curve of the fluorescent intensity for SRB-EN mixture.
Figure 5(A) The timeline of the animal experiment; (B) Body weight, (C) paw swelling ratio and (D) clinical score of AIA mice during 10 days of treatment using the listed treatment. (E) The frontal and profile images of hind paw of each group. (F) the TNF-α and IL-6 (G) concentration of serum after listed treatment. * p < 0.05 vs. SA. NS represents no significance.
Figure 6Representative H&E stained images of ankle joints from normal mice and AIA mice treated with SA, eSC, and eMN.