| Literature DB >> 34199630 |
Yixuan Xie1, Ruomei Shao1,2, Yali Lin1,2, Chunnan Wang1,3, Ying Tan1, Weidong Xie1, Shuqing Sun1,2,3.
Abstract
In this paper, we prepared patches that were composed of a degradable microneedle (MN) array with a soft backing provided for the skin tissue. We then performed a transdermal delivery of anti-obesity drugs to evaluate the effectiveness of β3 adrenergic receptor CL316243 in obesity treatment in overweight mice induced by a high-fat diet. Eighty male National Institutes of Health (NIH) mice were randomly divided into four obese groups or the control group. The obesity groups were given a high-fat diet for 15-18 weeks to establish an obese model. Afterward, the obese groups were divided into the following four groups: the control group, the unloaded MN group, the CL-316243 MN group, and the injection group. For the injection group, the group of mice was injected subcutaneously with CL316243 (1 mg/(kg·day)) for 15 days. Furthermore, the CL-316243 MN group was given a lower dose (0.1 mg/(kg·day)) for 15 days. After weighing the mice, we used Western blotting to detect the expression of uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) in the adipose tissue around the mouse viscera. The results stated that the weight of the CL-316243 MN group and the injection group dropped, and the UCP1 protein expression of brown adipose tissue (BAT) significantly increased. The results demonstrated the β3 adrenergic receptor agonist CL316243 could be carried into the body through MN, and the dose applied was considerably smaller than the injection dose. The reason for this may arise from the CL-316243 being delivered by MN arrays to subcutaneous adipose tissue more efficiently, with an even distribution, compared to that of the injection dose. This technique provides a new and feasible way to treat obesity more effectively.Entities:
Keywords: CL-316243; degradable microneedle; drug delivery; obesity
Year: 2021 PMID: 34199630 PMCID: PMC8226838 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13060827
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the concept. After applying the microneedle (MN) system to the groin on one side of the mouse, CL316243 was released from the MN and absorbed by the tissue capillaries. The dashed frame shows the composition of the microneedle materials.
Figure 2Schematic of the fabrication process of drug-loaded MN-patches: (a) replication of PDMS negative molds by casting the prepolymer onto a copper master; (b) casting PLA/PLGA onto the PDMS molds with microcavities; (c) fabrication of PDMS mold by vacuum; (d) casting PVA/sucrose prepolymer onto the PDMS mold; (e) drying the mold; (f) peeling off the polymer microneedle patch from the PDMS mold; (g) the physical picture of the microneedle by electronic magnifier.
Figure 3(A) Top view under an optical microscope (scale bar: 100 μm) (left) and side view under optical microscope (right); (B) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of cone MN; (C) SEM images of pyramid MN.
Figure 4(A) Schematic diagram of compression test; (B) The force-displacement curves of cone or pyramid MN; (C) Pinhole image of mouse micro-skin after 30 s of pressing (scale bar: 2 mm); (D) Mouse skin peeled within 1 min after microneedle puncture (scale bar: 2 mm); (E) Trypan blue staining image of mouse skin administration (scale bar: 2 mm); (F) H&E-stained cross-section of inserted skin by MN; (G) SEM image of MN after application to the skin; (H) Skin recovery images at 0 min, 2 min, 4 min and 6 min after MN treatment (scale bar: 2 mm); (I) Fluorescent confocal stereogram with FITC drug-loaded microneedles (scale bar: 500 μm).; (J) Fluorescent confocal top view of FITC drug-loaded microneedles (scale bar: 500 μm).
Figure 5(A) Body weight in model group and control group; (B) Food intake of mice after dosing; (C) Body weight with different treatments. (A) Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD), two-tailed Student’s t-test, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001 compared to control group (n = 10). (B,C) Error bars indicate SD, Ordinary one-way ANVOA test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (n = 15).
Figure 6(A) BAT weight with different treatments; (B) eWAT weight with different treatments; (C) iWAT weight with different treatments; (D) Representative H&E staining images of WAT (scale bar: 50 μm); T3 (E) and TSH (F) levels in mouse serum; (G) BAT UCP1 protein expression. (A–C,E,F) Error bars indicate SD, Ordinary one-way ANVOA test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (n = 15).