| Literature DB >> 34094826 |
Qin Wang1, Xianyan Qin1, Jiyu Fang2, Xun Sun3.
Abstract
Increasing understanding of the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has remarkably promoted the development of effective therapeutic regimens of RA. Nevertheless, the inadequate response to current therapies in a proportion of patients, the systemic toxicity accompanied by long-term administration or distribution in non-targeted sites and the comprised efficacy caused by undesirable bioavailability, are still unsettled problems lying across the full remission of RA. So far, these existing limitations have inspired comprehensive academic researches on nanomedicines for RA treatment. A variety of versatile nanocarriers with controllable physicochemical properties, tailorable drug release pattern or active targeting ability were fabricated to enhance the drug delivery efficiency in RA treatment. This review aims to provide an up-to-date progress regarding to RA treatment using nanomedicines in the last 5 years and concisely discuss the potential application of several newly emerged therapeutic strategies such as inducing the antigen-specific tolerance, pro-resolving therapy or regulating the immunometabolism for RA treatments.Entities:
Keywords: Immune tolerance; Inflammation resolution; Liposome; Micelle; Nanomedicines; Rheumatoid arthritis; Stimulus-responsive delivery systems; Targeted drug delivery
Year: 2021 PMID: 34094826 PMCID: PMC8144894 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.03.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 11.413
Figure 1The comparison of physiological microenvironment between normal synovium and inflamed sites. Compared with normal synovial tissues, massive inflammatory cells are recruited to inflamed joints. Afterwards, rapid proliferation and activation of cells involved in inflammation lead to the formation of pannus and the thickening of the synovial lining. Antigen-presenting cells (APCs) including DCs, activated B cells and macrophages present antigens to T cells, leading to the activation of autoreactive T cells. Other than antigen presentation, B cells would also secrete autoantibodies such as ACPA and RF, which can attack our own tissues. On the other hand, large number of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1) and invasive proteases would be produced, mediating the expansion of inflammatory network and the destruction of cartilage and bone tissue. FLS, fibroblast-like synoviocyte; DC, dendritic cell; VEC, vascular endothelial cells; MMPs, matrix metalloproteinase; Autoantibodies including rheumatoid factors (RFs) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs); Inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, etc.
The advantages and disadvantages of clinical drugs in RA treatment.
| Classification | Drug | Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSAIDs | Indomethacin | Rapidly reduce pain and inflammation by inhibiting COX | Inability to stop joint damage, gastrointestinal bleeding and kidney dysfunction |
| Ibuprofen | |||
| Diclofenac sodium | |||
| DMARDs | Methotrexate | Effective in controlling the disease progression | Take effect slowly and hepatic cirrhosis, kidney failure |
| Sulfasalazine | |||
| GCs | Dexamethasone | Powerful inhibition of inflammation | Hypertension, osteoporosis and immunosuppression |
| Prednisolone | |||
| Betamethasone | |||
| Biological agents | Adalimumab | High specificity and efficacy | High cost, low responsiveness and increased risk of infection |
| Rituximab | |||
| Anakinra |
Delivery strategies for different types of agents.
| Category of agents | Agent | Formulation | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small molecule | Dexamethasone | PEG‒Dex conjugates | |
| Methotrexate | Dextran sulfate‒MTX conjugates | ||
| Methotrexate | Albumin‒MTX conjugates | ||
| Methylprednisolone | Cyclodextrin‒ | ||
| Dexamethasone | PEGylation liposomes | ||
| Dexamethasone | DC8,9PC and DSPE-PEG liposomes | ||
| Dexamethasone | PCL‒PEG micelles | ||
| Methotrexate | SA-Dex-OA/MTX micelles | ||
| Curcumin | HA-Cur micelles | ||
| Methotrexate | MTX-loaded albumin nanoparticles | ||
| Methotrexate | Au/Fe half-shell PLGA nanoparticles | ||
| Nucleic acid | IL-1 | Lipidoid‒polymer hybrid nanoparticles | |
| p65 siRNA | PCL‒PEI and PCL‒PEG micelles | ||
| siRNA against BTK | PEG- | ||
| TNF- | PEGylated solid-lipid nanoparticles | ||
| Peptide/protein | Core peptide | PEGylated liposomes | |
| TNF- | Carboxymethyl cellulose microneedle | ||
| Etanercept | HA crosslinked microneedle | ||
| TRAIL | HSA‒TRAIL conjugates | ||
| Tocilizumab | Gold nanoparticles |
PEG, polyethylene glycol; DC8,9PC, 1,2-bis (10,12-tricosadiynoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; PCL‒PEG, poly(ethylene glycol)‒poly(ε-caprolactone); SA, sialic acid; OA, octadecanoic acid; PCL‒PEI, poly(ε-caprolactone)-polyetherimide; HA, hyaluronic acid; Cur, curcumin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); TRAIL, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand; HSA, human serum albumin.
Figure 2Schematic illustration of active targeting delivery strategies.
Active targeting strategies.
| Type | Receptor | Delivery strategy | Drug | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small molecule | ||||
| FA | Folate receptor | BSA nanoparticles | Etoricoxib | |
| Dendrimer G5 | Methotrexate | |||
| FA-PEG-DSPE liposomes | Prednisolone and methotrexate | |||
| DOPE/CH/DSPE-mPEG liposomes | Methotrexate | |||
| Nanogold-core dendrimer | Methotrexate | |||
| FA-PSA-CC micelles | Dexamethasone | |||
| FA-PLGA nanoparticles | Dexamethasone | |||
| FA-PEG-CH-DEAE15 nanoparticles | siRNA | |||
| Mannose | Mannose receptor | DSPC/Chol/Man liposomes | Withaferin-A | |
| DSPC/Chol/F-DHPE/Man liposomes | Morin | |||
| SA | E-selectin | SA-Dex-OA micelles | Methotrexate | |
| L-selectin | SA-cholesterol conjugated liposomes | Dexamethasone palmitate | ||
| Galactose | Galactose-specific C-type lectin | GDR-TPT nanoparticles | Triptolide | |
| Polymer | ||||
| DS | Scavenger receptor | DS- | Methotrexate | |
| DS- | Methotrexate | |||
| HA | CD44 | HA–MTX conjugate | Methotrexate | |
| HA‒DPPE liposomes | Prednisolone | |||
| HA/Cur micelles | Curcumin | |||
| HA polymeric nanoparticles | Dexamethasone | |||
| HA‒phospholipid micelles | Triamcinolone | |||
| HA‒gold nanoparticles | Tocilizumab | |||
| Protein | ||||
| Anti-CD64 antibody | CD64 | Anti-CD64-SPIONs-PLGA nanoparticles | Methotrexate | |
| Albumin | SPARC | MTX@HSA nanoparticles | Methotrexate | |
| TAC‒HSA nanoparticles | Tacrolimus | |||
| CD163 monoclonal antibody | Haemoglobin scavenger receptor CD163 | Anti-CD163-dexamethasone conjugate | Dexamethasone | |
| Peptide | ||||
| RGD | RGD-Lip-PRE liposomes | Prednisone | ||
| Au/Fe/Au PLGA nanoparticles | Methotrexate | |||
| Au PLGA nanoparticles | Methotrexate | |||
| Perfluorocarbon nanoparticles | Fumagillin prodrug | |||
| RGD-PEG-PLA micelles | Methotrexate and nimesulide | |||
| VIP | VIP receptor | DSPE-PEG3400-VIP micelles | Camptothecin | |
| Tuftsin | Fc and neuropilin-1 receptors | Alginate nanoparticles | IL-10 DNA | |
| HAP-1 | Synovial | HAP-1 liposomes | Prednisolone | |
| CBP | Collagens | CBP– | TNF- | |
| ADK | Endothelial cells | ART-1-IL-27 liposomes | IL-27 | |
| Membrane | ||||
| Platelet membrane | P-selectin and GVPI | PLGA nanoparticles | Tacrolimus | |
| Neutrophil membrane | LFA-1 | PLGA nanoparticles | None | |
| Macrophage membrane | Mac-1 | PLGA nanoparticles | Tacrolimus | |
| TRAIL-expressing vein endothelial cell membrane | TRAIL ligands | PLGA nanoparticles | Hydroxychloroquine | |
FA, folic acid; BSA, bovine serum albumin; DOPE, 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine, DSPE-mPEG, N-(carbonyl methoxypolyethylene glycol)-1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine; PSA, polysialic acid; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); CH, chitosan; DEAE, diethylethylamine; DSPC, 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; Chol, cholesterol; Man, mannose; F-DHPE, N-(fluorescein-5-thiocarbamoyl)-1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-phosphoethanolamine, triethylammonium salt; SA, sialic acid; Dex, dexamethasone; OA, octadecanoic acid; GDR, galactosyl-dextran-retinal; TPT, triptolide; DS, dextran sulfate; PCL, poly(ε-caprolactone); MTX, methotrexate; HA, hyaluronic acid; DPPE, dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine; Cur, curcumin; SPIONs, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles; SPARC, secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine; HSA, human serum albumin; TAC, tacrolimus; RGD, arginine-glycine-aspartic acid; PRE, prednisone; PLA, polylactic acid; VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide; CBP, collagen-binding peptide; ART-1, CRNADKFPC; TRAIL, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand.
Summary of typical inflammatory stimulus in vivo.
| Stimulus | Type | Detail | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | – | Acidic pH range: 7.2–5.0 | |
| Enzymes | MMP-1 | Produced by chondrocytes, osteoblasts and synovial cells | |
| MMP-3 | Produced by fibroblasts | ||
| MMP-9 | Produced by monocytes and macrophages | ||
| PLA2 | Produced by activated monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils | ||
| ROS | O2‒ | Produced by granulocytes |
– Not applicable.
MMPs, matrix metalloproteinase; PLA2, phospholipase A2; ROS, reactive oxygen species.
Stimulus-responsive drug delivery systems.
| Stimulus | Responsive unit | Delivery strategy | Drug | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEG-based micelles | Dexamethasone | |||
| mPEG-PPF micelles | Ibuprofen | |||
| AKP-Dex nanoparticles | Dexamethasone | |||
| Calcium phosphate | MP-HA nanoparticles | Methotrexate | ||
| Triglycerol monostearate | DSPE-PEG/TGMS nanoparticles | Dexamethasone | ||
| – | YH18 peptide/dhfas-1 | |||
| Manganese ferrite and ceria | MFC-MSNs nanoparticles | Methotrexate | ||
| TPP@PMM micelles | Prednisolone | |||
| TPP@PMM micelles | Prednisolone | |||
| -Se-Se- | VES-PLGA-Se-Se-mPEG micelles | Berberine | ||
| Oxi- | Dexamethasone | |||
| Fe | Fe-EC nanoparticles | Diclofenac sodium | ||
| Fe | PSS-doped CaCO3 microcapsules | Prednisolone |
PPF, polypropylene fumarate; AKP, acetone-based ketal-linked prodrugs; MP, mineralization of PEGylated; TGMS, triglycerol monostearate; MFC-MSNs, manganese ferrite and ceria nanoparticle-anchored mesoporous silica nanoparticles; TPP, two-photon prednisolone; PMM, PMPC (2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine)−PMEMA (2-(methylthio) ethanol methacrylate); VES, vitamin E succinate; Oxi-αCD, oxygen species α-cyclodextrin; EC, ethylcellulose; PSS, poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate).
Figure 3The newly emerged promising therapeutic approaches for RA treatment. (a) Endogenous pro-resolving mediators initiate resolution function by acting on specific cell types, including promoting macrophages repolarization from pro-inflammatory M1 type to anti-inflammatory M2 type, facilitating neutrophils apoptosis and play a key role in chondroprotection and osteoclastgenesis inhibition. (b) Cells involved in inflammation development would undergo a metabolic reprogramming, displaying a highly increased metabolic demand. Increased anabolic metabolism would promote inflammation and motivate immune response. Therefore, facilitating the balance of cell metabolism would be a possible therapeutic intervention option. (c) Induction of specific immune tolerance during the interaction between DCs and T cells would produce increased level of Treg and decrease the level of autoreactive immune cells, which might provide a long-term, sustained disease remission.