PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to examine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drug uptake for microneedle-based intradermal (ID) delivery of several classes of protein drugs compared to standard subcutaneous (SC) administration. METHODS: Systemic absorption kinetics of various proteins were analyzed following microneedle-based ID delivery and standard injection methods in the swine model. Comparative PK data were determined using standard non-compartmental techniques based on blood serum levels. RESULTS: Delivery of proteins using microneedles resulted in faster systemic availability, measured via t(max,) and increased maximal drug concentration, C(max,) over SC delivery for all proteins tested. Some agents also exhibited increased bioavailability for the ID route. Imaging studies using reporter dyes showed rapid lymphatic-mediated uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Microneedle delivery is applicable to a wide variety of protein drugs and is capable of effective parenteral administration of therapeutic drug dosages. This delivery route alters absorption kinetics via targeting a tissue bed better perfused with lymphatic and blood vessels than the SC space. Microneedle delivery may afford various advantages, including a robust method to increase the absorption rate and bioavailability of proteins that have been challenging to deliver at therapeutic levels or with physiologically relevant profiles.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to examine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drug uptake for microneedle-based intradermal (ID) delivery of several classes of protein drugs compared to standard subcutaneous (SC) administration. METHODS: Systemic absorption kinetics of various proteins were analyzed following microneedle-based ID delivery and standard injection methods in the swine model. Comparative PK data were determined using standard non-compartmental techniques based on blood serum levels. RESULTS: Delivery of proteins using microneedles resulted in faster systemic availability, measured via t(max,) and increased maximal drug concentration, C(max,) over SC delivery for all proteins tested. Some agents also exhibited increased bioavailability for the ID route. Imaging studies using reporter dyes showed rapid lymphatic-mediated uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Microneedle delivery is applicable to a wide variety of protein drugs and is capable of effective parenteral administration of therapeutic drug dosages. This delivery route alters absorption kinetics via targeting a tissue bed better perfused with lymphatic and blood vessels than the SC space. Microneedle delivery may afford various advantages, including a robust method to increase the absorption rate and bioavailability of proteins that have been challenging to deliver at therapeutic levels or with physiologically relevant profiles.
Authors: Devin V McAllister; Ping M Wang; Shawn P Davis; Jung-Hwan Park; Paul J Canatella; Mark G Allen; Mark R Prausnitz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-11-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David Holland; Robert Booy; Ferdinandus De Looze; Peter Eizenberg; James McDonald; Jeff Karrasch; Maureen McKeirnan; Hatem Salem; Graham Mills; Jim Reid; Françoise Weber; Melanie Saville Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Christopher Rini; Bruce C Roberts; Didier Morel; Rick Klug; Benjamin Selvage; Ronald J Pettis Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2019-03-17
Authors: Fang Wu; Suraj G Bhansali; Wing Cheung Law; Earl J Bergey; Paras N Prasad; Marilyn E Morris Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Sharifa Al-Zahrani; Marija Zaric; Cian McCrudden; Chris Scott; Adrien Kissenpfennig; Ryan F Donnelly Journal: Expert Opin Drug Deliv Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 6.648