Literature DB >> 3109484

The pH dependence of the hydrolysis of chromogenic substrates of the type, Lys-Pro-Xaa-Yaa-Phe-(NO2)Phe-Arg-Leu, by selected aspartic proteinases: evidence for specific interactions in subsites S3 and S2.

B M Dunn, M J Valler, C E Rolph, S I Foundling, M Jimenez, J Kay.   

Abstract

Variation in the kinetic parameters, kcat and Km, with pH has been used to obtain evidence for significant acid-dissociation processes in the hydrolysis of octapeptide substrates by three aspartic proteinases. These substrates are all cleaved at the peptide bond between a Phe (P1) and a p-nitroPhe (P1') residue resulting in a shift in absorbance at 300 nm that facilitates kinetic measurements. The substrates differ in the amino-acid residues present in the P3 and the P2 positions. Porcine pepsin, calf chymosin, and the aspartic proteinase from Endothia parasitica all show pH dependencies that imply that favorable or unfavorable interactions can occur with the S3 or S2 areas of the enzyme-active site. Examination of the crystallographically determined structure of the E. parasitica proteinase and consideration of the amino-acid sequence differences between the three enzymes suggests that the origin of the pH effects arises from favorable interactions between Glu-13 (COO-) of pig pepsin and Thr (OH) or His (ImH+) in P3 of a substrate. Similarly, Lys-220 (NH3+) of chymosin and a Glu (COO-) in P2 of a substrate may produce a favorable interaction and Asp-77 (COO-) of E. parasitica proteinase and a Glu (COO-) in P2 of a substrate may produce an unfavorable interaction. These results lead to possible explanations for subtle specificity differences within a family of homologous enzymes, and suggest loci for study by site-directed mutagenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3109484     DOI: 10.1016/0167-4838(87)90320-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  7 in total

1.  Kinetic parameters for the generation of endothelins-1,-2 and -3 by human cathepsin E.

Authors:  P S Robinson; W E Lees; J Kay; N D Cook
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  The selectivity of statine-based inhibitors against various human aspartic proteinases.

Authors:  R A Jupp; B M Dunn; J W Jacobs; G Vlasuk; K E Arcuri; D F Veber; D S Perlow; L S Payne; J Boger; S de Laszlo
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Inhibition of aspartic proteinases by alpha 2-macroglobulin.

Authors:  D J Thomas; A D Richards; J Kay
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1989-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Substrate and inhibitor studies with human gastric aspartic proteinases.

Authors:  A Baxter; C J Campbell; C J Grinham; R M Keane; B C Lawton; J E Pendlebury
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1990-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Proteolytic activity of novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proteinase proteins from a precursor with a blocking mutation at the N terminus of the PR domain.

Authors:  G Zybarth; H G Kräusslich; K Partin; C Carter
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Identification of the aspartic proteinases from human erythrocyte membranes and gastric mucosa (slow-moving proteinase) as catalytically equivalent to cathepsin E.

Authors:  R A Jupp; A D Richards; J Kay; B M Dunn; J B Wyckoff; I M Samloff; K Yamamoto
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Purification and characterization of pepsins A1 and A2 from the Antarctic rock cod Trematomus bernacchii.

Authors:  Sébastien Brier; Giovanna Maria; Vincenzo Carginale; Antonio Capasso; Yan Wu; Robert M Taylor; Nicholas B Borotto; Clemente Capasso; John R Engen
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.542

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.