Literature DB >> 31087728

Magnetic resonance elastography of the lungs: A repeatability and reproducibility study.

Faisal Fakhouri1,2, Huiming Dong1,2, Arunark Kolipaka1,2.   

Abstract

Lung diseases are one of the leading causes of death worldwide, from which four million people die annually. Lung diseases are associated with changes in the mechanical properties of the lungs. Several studies have shown the feasibility of using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to quantify the lungs' shear stiffness. The aim of this study is to investigate the reproducibility and repeatability of lung MRE, and its shear stiffness measurements, obtained using a modified spin echo-echo planar imaging (SE-EPI) MRE sequence. In this study, 21 healthy volunteers were scanned twice by repositioning the volunteers to image right lung both at residual volume (RV) and total lung capacity (TLC) to assess the reproducibility of lung shear stiffness measurements. Additionally, 19 out of the 21 volunteers were scanned immediately without moving the volunteers to test the repeatability of the modified SE-EPI MRE sequence. A paired t-test was performed to determine the significant difference between stiffness measurements obtained at RV and TLC. Concordance correlation and Bland-Altman's analysis were performed to determine the reproducibility and repeatability of the SE-EPI MRE-derived shear stiffness measurements. The SE-EPI MRE sequence is highly repeatable with a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.95 at RV and 0.96 at TLC. Similarly, the stiffness measurements obtained across all volunteers were highly reproducible with a CCC of 0.95 at RV and 0.92 at TLC. The mean shear stiffness of the lung at RV was 0.93 ± 0.22 kPa and at TLC was 1.41 ± 0.41 kPa. TLC showed a significantly higher mean shear stiffness (P = 0.0004) compared with RV. Lung MRE stiffness measurements obtained using the SE-EPI sequence were reproducible and repeatable, both at RV and TLC. Lung shear stiffness changes across respiratory cycle with significantly higher stiffness at TLC than RV.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lung MRE; lung stiffness; magnetic resonance elastography; residual volume stiffness; total lung capacity stiffness

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31087728     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  4 in total

1.  Free-breathing MR elastography of the lungs: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Faisal Fakhouri; Stephan Kannengiesser; Josef Pfeuffer; Yevgeniya Gokun; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Intervertebral Discs: Spin-Echo Echo-Planar Imaging Sequence Validation.

Authors:  Megan Co; Huiming Dong; Daniel J Boulter; Xuan V Nguyen; Safdar N Khan; Brian Raterman; Brett Klamer; Arunark Kolipaka; Benjamin A Walter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 5.119

3.  Mechanobiology of Pulmonary Diseases: A Review of Engineering Tools to Understand Lung Mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Caymen Novak; Megan N Ballinger; Samir Ghadiali
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Graph-based rotational nonuniformity correction for localized compliance measurement in the human nasopharynx.

Authors:  Yusi Miao; Joseph J Jing; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.732

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.