Literature DB >> 31080954

Detecting Major Complications and Death After Emergency Abdominal Surgery Using the Surgical Apgar Score: A Retrospective Analysis in a Caribbean Setting.

Keevan Singh1, Seetharaman Hariharan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) is a simple 10-point scoring system that has been shown to be predictive of major postoperative complications and death after surgery. We evaluated the predictive ability of this score in a cohort of patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery in a Caribbean tertiary hospital.
METHODS: The SAS was calculated retrospectively from the anaesthesia records of all patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery during a 12-month period. The postoperative surgical records of these patients were then examined for the presence of major complications and death. The association between the SAS and outcomes was tested using binary logistic regression, and the SAS discriminatory ability was determined from the receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 220 patients studied, 72 (33%) suffered an in-hospital major complication or death. The highest complication rate occurred in the low-scoring groups, with 68% of those scoring <4 being affected. Low-scoring patients (<4) had four times the risk of major complications when compared to higher-scoring groups (relative risk [RR], 4.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-7.3; p<0.001). The odds ratio (OR) for major complications or death per unit increase in the SAS was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.47-0.72; p<0.001). The c-statistic of the SAS for predicting major complications or death was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.68-0.73; p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The SAS is a simple 10-point score that can be used in patients undergoing emergency surgery in a Caribbean setting to help identify those that are at a higher risk of postoperative complications. Due to its ease in calculation, it can be added to other commonly used criteria to help triage the postoperative patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaesthesia; intensive care; risk; surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31080954      PMCID: PMC6499045          DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.65872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim        ISSN: 2149-276X


  24 in total

1.  Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  T H Lee; E R Marcantonio; C M Mangione; E J Thomas; C A Polanczyk; E F Cook; D J Sugarbaker; M C Donaldson; R Poss; K K Ho; L E Ludwig; A Pedan; L Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit.

Authors:  G P Copeland; D Jones; M Walters
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Risk scoring in perioperative and surgical intensive care patients: a review.

Authors:  Seetharaman Hariharan; Andrew Zbar
Journal:  Curr Surg       Date:  2006 May-Jun

4.  An Apgar score for surgery.

Authors:  Atul A Gawande; Mary R Kwaan; Scott E Regenbogen; Stuart A Lipsitz; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

Authors:  Pierre A Clavien; Jeffrey Barkun; Michelle L de Oliveira; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Daniel Dindo; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Ksenija Slankamenac; Claudio Bassi; Rolf Graf; René Vonlanthen; Robert Padbury; John L Cameron; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data.

Authors:  Thomas G Weiser; Scott E Regenbogen; Katherine D Thompson; Alex B Haynes; Stuart R Lipsitz; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Recent advances in perioperative medicine: highlights from the literature for the cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesiologist.

Authors:  John G T Augoustides; Prakash Patel
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Does the Surgical Apgar Score measure intraoperative performance?

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; R Todd Lancaster; Stuart R Lipsitz; Caprice C Greenberg; Matthew M Hutter; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Utility of the surgical apgar score: validation in 4119 patients.

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Stuart R Lipsitz; Caprice C Greenberg; Matthew M Hutter; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-01

10.  The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility.

Authors:  Aaron S Fink; Darrell A Campbell; Robert M Mentzer; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Janet Bannister; Kwan Hur; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.