Literature DB >> 12192321

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility.

Aaron S Fink1, Darrell A Campbell, Robert M Mentzer, William G Henderson, Jennifer Daley, Janet Bannister, Kwan Hur, Shukri F Khuri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of implementing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) methodology in non-VA hospitals. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Using data adjusted for patient preoperative risk, the NSQIP compares the performance of all VA hospitals performing major surgery and anonymously compares these hospitals using the ratio of observed to expected adverse events. These results are provided to each hospital and used to identify areas for improvement. Since the NSQIP's inception in 1994, the VA has reported consistent improvements in all surgery performance measures. Given the success of the NSQIP within the VA, as well as the lack of a comparable system in non-VA hospitals, this pilot study was undertaken to test the applicability of the NSQIP models and methodology in the nonfederal sector.
METHODS: Beginning in 1999, three academic medical centers (Emory University, Atlanta, GA; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY) volunteered the time of a dedicated surgical nurse reviewer who was trained in NSQIP methodology. At each academic center, these nurse reviewers used NSQIP protocols to abstract clinical data from general surgery and vascular surgery patients. Data were manually collected and then transmitted via the Internet to a secure web site developed by the NSQIP. These data were compared to the data for general and vascular surgery patients collected during a concurrent time period (10/99 to 9/00) within the VA by the NSQIP. Logistic regression models were developed for both non-VA and VA hospital data. To assess the models' predictive values, C-indices (0.5 = no prediction; 1.0 = perfect prediction) were calculated after applying the models to the non-VA as well as the VA databases.
RESULTS: Data from 2,747 (general surgery 2,251; vascular surgery 496) non-VA hospital cases were compared to data from 41,360 (general surgery 31,393; vascular surgery 9,967) VA cases. The bivariate relationships between individual risk factors and 30-day mortality or morbidity were similar in the non-VA and VA patient populations for over 66% of the risk variables. C-indices of 0.942 (general surgery), 0.915 (vascular surgery), and 0.934 (general plus vascular surgery) were obtained following application of the VA NSQIP mortality model to the non-VA patient data. Lower C-indices (0.778, general surgery; 0.638, vascular surgery; 0.760, general plus vascular surgery) were obtained following application of the VA NSQIP morbidity model to the non-VA patient data. Although the non-VA sample size was smaller than the VA, preliminary analysis suggested no differences in risk-adjusted mortality between the non-VA and VA cohorts. CONCLUSIONS With some adjustments, the NSQIP methodology can be implemented and generates reasonable predictive models within non-VA hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12192321      PMCID: PMC1422588          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200209000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  27 in total

Review 1.  Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems.

Authors:  P Barach; S D Small
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  Can quality circles improve hospital-acquired infection control?

Authors:  D H Forster; G Krause; P Gastmeier; W Ebner; A Rath; N Wischnewski; M Lacour; H Rüden; F D Daschner
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: chart review of process of care.

Authors:  J Gibbs; K Clark; S Khuri; W Henderson; K Hur; J Daley
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  The Veterans Affairs Continuous Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Study.

Authors:  F L Grover; R R Johnson; A L Shroyer; G Marshall; K E Hammermeister
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Sounding boards. The graying of grand rounds.

Authors:  F J Ingelfinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-10-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Institutional peer review can reduce the risk and cost of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  I V Olcott C; R S Mitchell; G K Steinberg; C K Zarins
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

7.  Coronary bypass surgery improves survival in high-risk unstable angina. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative study with an 8-year follow-up. Veterans Administration Unstable Angina Cooperative Study Group.

Authors:  G V Sharma; R H Deupree; S F Khuri; A F Parisi; R J Luchi; S M Scott
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Chance, continuity, and change in hospital mortality rates. Coronary artery bypass graft patients in California hospitals, 1983 to 1989.

Authors:  H S Luft; P S Romano
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-07-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State.

Authors:  E L Hannan; H Kilburn; M Racz; E Shields; M R Chassin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; G Barbour; P Lowry; G Irvin; J Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; J F Stremple
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  118 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter; Sheldon Randall; Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; William M Abbott; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Requiem and renewal.

Authors:  R Scott Jones
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes in 17,199 patients using ACS/NSQIP.

Authors:  Andrew J Page; Jonathan D Pollock; Sebastian Perez; S Scott Davis; Edward Lin; John F Sweeney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more predictive of costs than postoperative complications: a case study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

Authors:  Daniel L Davenport; William G Henderson; Shukri F Khuri; Robert M Mentzer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The impact of the 80-hour resident workweek on surgical residents and attending surgeons.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter; Katherine C Kellogg; Charles M Ferguson; William M Abbott; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Strategies for promoting organizational and practice change by advancing implementation research.

Authors:  Lisa V Rubenstein; Jacqueline Pugh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  In-hospital versus postdischarge adverse events following carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Margriet Fokkema; Rodney P Bensley; Ruby C Lo; Allan D Hamden; Mark C Wyers; Frans L Moll; Gert Jan de Borst; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Seasonal variation in surgical outcomes as measured by the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).

Authors:  Michael J Englesbe; Shawn J Pelletier; John C Magee; Paul Gauger; Tracy Schifftner; William G Henderson; Shukri F Khuri; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Surgical site occurrences, not body mass index, increase the long-term risk of ventral hernia recurrence.

Authors:  Joshua S Jolissaint; Bryan V Dieffenbach; Thomas C Tsai; Luise I Pernar; Brent T Shoji; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkoli
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Impact of Surgical Quality Improvement on Payments in Medicare Patients.

Authors:  Christopher P Scally; Jyothi R Thumma; John D Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.