Lindsay A Taliaferro1, Brittany M Harder2, Nik M Lampe3, Shannon K Carter3, G Nic Rider4, Marla E Eisenberg5. 1. Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL. Electronic address: Lindsay.Taliaferro@ucf.edu. 2. Department of History, Sociology, Geography, and Legal Studies, University of Tampa, Tampa, FL. 3. Department of Sociology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL. 4. Program in Human Sexuality, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN. 5. Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare social connectedness factors that facilitate use of primary, dental, and mental healthcare services among transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) and cisgender adolescents. METHODS: Data from the cross-sectional 2016 Minnesota Student Survey were used to examine protective social connectedness factors associated with use of different healthcare services among matched samples of 1916 TGNC and 1916 cisgender youth. Stratified, logistic regression analyses were used to examine background characteristics and social connectedness factors (parent connectedness, connections to other nonparental adults, teacher-student relationships, and friend connections) associated with use of each healthcare service within the last year. RESULTS: For TGNC youth, but not for cisgender youth, higher levels of parent connectedness were associated with receipt of primary (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.40-3.66) and dental (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.78-5.08) care services, and lower levels of connectedness to nonparental adults was associated with receipt of mental healthcare (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.93). Among cisgender youth, no protective factors were significantly associated with receipt of primary care services, higher levels of friend connections were associated with receipt of dental services (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.10-3.09), and lower levels of parent connectedness were associated with receipt of mental healthcare (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10-0.40). CONCLUSIONS: To promote the health of TGNC youth, clinicians should understand the distinct factors associated with obtaining healthcare among this population such as the need for tailored efforts focused on strengthening connectedness between TGNC youth and their parents to facilitate receipt of needed care.
OBJECTIVE: To compare social connectedness factors that facilitate use of primary, dental, and mental healthcare services among transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) and cisgender adolescents. METHODS: Data from the cross-sectional 2016 Minnesota Student Survey were used to examine protective social connectedness factors associated with use of different healthcare services among matched samples of 1916 TGNC and 1916 cisgender youth. Stratified, logistic regression analyses were used to examine background characteristics and social connectedness factors (parent connectedness, connections to other nonparental adults, teacher-student relationships, and friend connections) associated with use of each healthcare service within the last year. RESULTS: For TGNC youth, but not for cisgender youth, higher levels of parent connectedness were associated with receipt of primary (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.40-3.66) and dental (OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.78-5.08) care services, and lower levels of connectedness to nonparental adults was associated with receipt of mental healthcare (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.93). Among cisgender youth, no protective factors were significantly associated with receipt of primary care services, higher levels of friend connections were associated with receipt of dental services (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.10-3.09), and lower levels of parent connectedness were associated with receipt of mental healthcare (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10-0.40). CONCLUSIONS: To promote the health of TGNC youth, clinicians should understand the distinct factors associated with obtaining healthcare among this population such as the need for tailored efforts focused on strengthening connectedness between TGNC youth and their parents to facilitate receipt of needed care.
Authors: Maureen D Connolly; Marcus J Zervos; Charles J Barone; Christine C Johnson; Christine L M Joseph Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Ann P Haas; Mickey Eliason; Vickie M Mays; Robin M Mathy; Susan D Cochran; Anthony R D'Augelli; Morton M Silverman; Prudence W Fisher; Tonda Hughes; Margaret Rosario; Stephen T Russell; Effie Malley; Jerry Reed; David A Litts; Ellen Haller; Randall L Sell; Gary Remafedi; Judith Bradford; Annette L Beautrais; Gregory K Brown; Gary M Diamond; Mark S Friedman; Robert Garofalo; Mason S Turner; Amber Hollibaugh; Paula J Clayton Journal: J Homosex Date: 2011
Authors: Sari L Reisner; Kerith J Conron; Laura Anatale Tardiff; Stephanie Jarvi; Allegra R Gordon; S Bryn Austin Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Sanjana Pampati; Jack Andrzejewski; Riley J Steiner; Catherine N Rasberry; Susan H Adkins; Catherine A Lesesne; Lorin Boyce; Rose Grace Grose; Michelle M Johns Journal: J Pediatr Nurs Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 2.145
Authors: C Riley Hostetter; Jarrod Call; Donald R Gerke; Brendon T Holloway; N Eugene Walls; Jennifer C Greenfield Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-22 Impact factor: 3.390