Nik M Lampe1,2, Alexandra C H Nowakowski3. 1. Department of Sociology/Women's and Gender Studies Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA. 2. South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina. 3. Department of Geriatrics/Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine, Orlando Regional Campus, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transgender and non-binary people experience erasure, stigma, and discrimination in sexual and reproductive health care. Previous research shows worse sexual and reproductive health outcomes and higher rates of chronicity for trans and non-binary populations as compared to cisgender populations. Historically such outcomes have been framed as separate issues. AIMS: To describe methodological approaches for exploring gaps in the sexual and reproductive health care of transgender and non-binary people, and explore intersections between chronic disease management and gender-affirming care. METHODS: We critically reviewed methods for studying sexual and reproductive care and chronic condition management among trans and non-binary populations. We focus on two themes: unmet needs and response strategies. RESULTS: We summarize findings and opportunities in existing research about service needs in trans and non-binary care. Key barriers to effective sexual and reproductive care for trans and non-binary people include persistent medical myths about trans people and bodies, siloization of different domains of health and associated services, lack of research on how chronic disease treatments interact with transition related care, and lack of active communication between providers and patients about individual care needs and goals. DISCUSSION: We recommend methodologically diverse research with trans and non-binary populations capturing: (1) erasure, stigma, and discrimination in sexual and reproductive health care settings; (2) individual, interpersonal, and structural factors catalyzing chronicity; and (3) the impact of sexual and reproductive health disparities on chronic disease outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Transgender and non-binary people experience erasure, stigma, and discrimination in sexual and reproductive health care. Previous research shows worse sexual and reproductive health outcomes and higher rates of chronicity for trans and non-binary populations as compared to cisgender populations. Historically such outcomes have been framed as separate issues. AIMS: To describe methodological approaches for exploring gaps in the sexual and reproductive health care of transgender and non-binary people, and explore intersections between chronic disease management and gender-affirming care. METHODS: We critically reviewed methods for studying sexual and reproductive care and chronic condition management among trans and non-binary populations. We focus on two themes: unmet needs and response strategies. RESULTS: We summarize findings and opportunities in existing research about service needs in trans and non-binary care. Key barriers to effective sexual and reproductive care for trans and non-binary people include persistent medical myths about trans people and bodies, siloization of different domains of health and associated services, lack of research on how chronic disease treatments interact with transition related care, and lack of active communication between providers and patients about individual care needs and goals. DISCUSSION: We recommend methodologically diverse research with trans and non-binary populations capturing: (1) erasure, stigma, and discrimination in sexual and reproductive health care settings; (2) individual, interpersonal, and structural factors catalyzing chronicity; and (3) the impact of sexual and reproductive health disparities on chronic disease outcomes.
Authors: S James-Abra; L A Tarasoff; D Green; R Epstein; S Anderson; S Marvel; L S Steele; L E Ross Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Sari L Reisner; Madeline B Deutsch; Shalender Bhasin; Walter Bockting; George R Brown; Jamie Feldman; Rob Garofalo; Baudewijntje Kreukels; Asa Radix; Joshua D Safer; Vin Tangpricha; Guy TʼSjoen; Michael Goodman Journal: Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 3.243