Literature DB >> 31073790

The effect of working memory maintenance on long-term memory.

Joshua K Hartshorne1,2,3, Tal Makovski4,5.   

Abstract

Initially inspired by the Atkinson and Shiffrin model, researchers have spent a half century investigating whether actively maintaining an item in working memory (WM) leads to improved subsequent long-term memory (LTM). Empirical results have been inconsistent, and thus the answer to the question remains unclear. We present evidence from 13 new experiments as well as a meta-analysis of 61 published experiments. Both the new experiments and meta-analysis show clear evidence that increased WM maintenance of a stimulus leads to superior recognition for that stimulus in subsequent LTM tests. This effect appears robust across a variety of experimental design parameters, suggesting that the variability in prior results in the literature is probably due to low power and random chance. The results support theories on which there is a close link between WM and LTM mechanisms, while challenging claims that this relationship is specific to verbal memory and evolved to support language acquisition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Change detection; Incidental memory; Language acquisition; Long-term memory; Verbal working memory; Visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31073790      PMCID: PMC6663308          DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00908-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  43 in total

1.  When keeping in mind supports later bringing to mind: neural markers of phonological rehearsal predict subsequent remembering.

Authors:  L Davachi; A Maril; A D Wagner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Working memory and the control of action: evidence from task switching.

Authors:  A Baddeley; D Chincotta; A Adlam
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

3.  Second thoughts versus second looks: an age-related deficit in reflectively refreshing just-activated information.

Authors:  Marcia K Johnson; John A Reeder; Carol L Raye; Karen J Mitchell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-01

Review 4.  Working memory: looking back and looking forward.

Authors:  Alan Baddeley
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 5.  Levels of processing: past, present. and future?

Authors:  Fergus I M Craik
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2002 Sep-Nov

6.  An age-related deficit in prefrontal cortical function associated with refreshing information.

Authors:  Marcia K Johnson; Karen J Mitchell; Carol L Raye; Erich J Greene
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-02

7.  Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.

Authors:  Ivan C Griffin; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The influence of retrieval on retention.

Authors:  M Carrier; H Pashler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

Review 9.  PRIMARY MEMORY.

Authors:  N C WAUGH; D A NORMAN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Limitations in working memory: implications for language development.

Authors:  A M Adams; S E Gathercole
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.020

View more
  5 in total

1.  Adolescent-specific memory effects: evidence from working memory, immediate and long-term recognition memory performance in 8-30 yr olds.

Authors:  Lena J Skalaban; Alexandra O Cohen; May I Conley; Qi Lin; Garrett N Schwartz; Nicholas A M Ruiz-Huidobro; Tariq Cannonier; Steven A Martinez; B J Casey
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.699

2.  Linking the Rapid Cascade of Visuo-Attentional Processes to Successful Memory Encoding.

Authors:  B R Geib; R Cabeza; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Working memory limits severely constrain long-term retention.

Authors:  Alicia Forsberg; Dominic Guitard; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-12-02

4.  Gaze dynamics are sensitive to target orienting for working memory encoding in virtual reality.

Authors:  Candace E Peacock; Ting Zhang; Brendan David-John; T Scott Murdison; Matthew J Boring; Hrvoje Benko; Tanya R Jonker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Functional Connectivity during Encoding Predicts Individual Differences in Long-Term Memory.

Authors:  Qi Lin; Kwangsun Yoo; Xilin Shen; Todd R Constable; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.