Literature DB >> 11784444

When keeping in mind supports later bringing to mind: neural markers of phonological rehearsal predict subsequent remembering.

L Davachi1, A Maril, A D Wagner.   

Abstract

The ability to bring to mind a past experience depends on the cognitive and neural processes that are engaged during the experience and that support memory formation. A central and much debated question is whether the processes that underlie rote verbal rehearsal-that is, working memory mechanisms that keep information in mind-impact memory formation and subsequent remembering. The present study used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore the relation between working memory maintenance operations and long-term memory. Specifically, we investigated whether the magnitude of activation in neural regions supporting the on-line maintenance of verbal codes is predictive of subsequent memory for words that were rote-rehearsed during learning. Furthermore, during rote rehearsal, the extent of neural activation in regions associated with semantic retrieval was assessed to determine the role that incidental semantic elaboration may play in subsequent memory for rote-rehearsed items. Results revealed that (a) the magnitude of activation in neural regions previously associated with phonological rehearsal (left prefrontal, bilateral parietal, supplementary motor, and cerebellar regions) was correlated with subsequent memory, and (b) while rote rehearsal did not--on average--elicit activation in an anterior left prefrontal region associated with semantic retrieval, activation in this region was greater for trials that were subsequently better remembered. Contrary to the prevalent view that rote rehearsal does not impact learning, these data suggest that phonological maintenance mechanisms, in addition to semantic elaboration, support the encoding of an experience such that it can be later remembered.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11784444     DOI: 10.1162/089892901753294356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  67 in total

1.  What neural correlates underlie successful encoding and retrieval? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study using a divided attention paradigm.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger; Richard J Clarke; Suzanne Corkin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Dissociating semantic and phonological maintenance using fMRI.

Authors:  Geeta Shivde; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  rTMS stimulation on left DLPFC increases the correct recognition of memories for emotional target and distractor words.

Authors:  Michela Balconi; Chiara Ferrari
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Complementary role of frontoparietal activity and cortical pattern similarity in successful episodic memory encoding.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qi Dong; Chuansheng Chen; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Increase in posterior alpha activity during rehearsal predicts successful long-term memory formation of word sequences.

Authors:  Esther B Meeuwissen; Atsuko Takashima; Guillén Fernández; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Reduced phonological similarity effects in patients with damage to the cerebellum.

Authors:  Timothy Justus; Susan M Ravizza; Julie A Fiez; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Dissociating familiarity from recollection using rote rehearsal.

Authors:  Ian G Dobbins; Neal E A Kroll; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

8.  Effects of aging on transient and sustained successful memory encoding activity.

Authors:  Nancy A Dennis; Sander Daselaar; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Episodic encoding is more than the sum of its parts: an fMRI investigation of multifeatural contextual encoding.

Authors:  Melina R Uncapher; Leun J Otten; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in associative learning.

Authors:  John R Anderson; Dana Byrne; Jon M Fincham; Pat Gunn
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.