Literature DB >> 31069525

Long-term results of an intensive cognitive behavioral pain management program for patients with chronic low back pain: a concise report of an extended cohort with a minimum of 5-year follow-up.

D Groot1, M L van Hooff2,3, R J Kroeze4, M Monshouwer5, J O'Dowd6,7, P Horsting4, M Spruit4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Treatment options for chronic low back pain (CLBP) include cognitive behavioral interventions. Most of these interventions only have small and short-lived effects. Using strict inclusion criteria for participation in an intensive combined physical and psychological program, encouraging effects were reported at 1-year follow-up. This study evaluates the long-term follow-up results of the same program. The hypothesis is that previously reported results are maintained.
METHODS: Structured interviews were conducted in a prospective extended cohort with a minimum of 5-year follow-up in a similar fashion as in the 1-year follow-up report. The median follow-up in this cohort was 6.5 years. The extended cohort consisted of 277 patients (85% response).
RESULTS: Outcomes include daily functioning, quality of life, current pain intensity, pain disturbance in daily activities and indicators of the use of pain medication and healthcare services. The previously reported positive 1-year follow-up results were maintained at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Disability as measured with the Oswestry disability index (ODIv2.1a) decreased from 40 to 27 in the first year. This positive result was maintained at the 6.5-year follow-up with an ODI of 28. Pain intensity (NRS 0-100) improved from 60 to 39 in the first year, and at 6.5 years, this had further improved to 33. Improvement in quality of life (SF 36) at 1-year follow-up was maintained at 6.5-year follow-up, and healthcare consumption had decreased substantially as measured with doctor visits and analgesics used for CLBP.
CONCLUSION: Selected and motivated patients with longstanding CLBP improve fast after an intensive combined physical and psychological program in daily functioning, pain and quality of life. Positive 1-year results are maintained, and healthcare utilization was still reduced at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive therapy; Low back pain; Pain management

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31069525     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-05967-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

Review 1.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Daily functioning and self-management in patients with chronic low back pain after an intensive cognitive behavioral programme for pain management.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Johannes D van der Merwe; John O'Dowd; Paul W Pavlov; Maarten Spruit; Marinus de Kleuver; Jacques van Limbeek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of spinal fusion and nonoperative treatment in patients with chronic low back pain: long-term follow-up of three randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Jens Ivar Brox; Jeremy C T Fairbank
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  The effect of neuroscience education on pain, disability, anxiety, and stress in chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Adriaan Louw; Ina Diener; David S Butler; Emilio J Puentedura
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  The trend in total cost of back pain in The Netherlands in the period 2002 to 2007.

Authors:  Ludeke C Lambeek; Maurits W van Tulder; Ilse C S Swinkels; Lando L J Koppes; Johannes R Anema; Willlem van Mechelen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Paul Willems
Journal:  Acta Orthop Suppl       Date:  2013-02

8.  A randomized controlled trial of intensive neurophysiology education in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Michael K Nicholas; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  A short, intensive cognitive behavioral pain management program reduces health-care use in patients with chronic low back pain: two-year follow-up results of a prospective cohort.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Werner Ter Avest; Philip P Horsting; John O'Dowd; Marinus de Kleuver; Wim van Lankveld; Jacques van Limbeek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Predictive factors for successful clinical outcome 1 year after an intensive combined physical and psychological programme for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Maarten Spruit; John K O'Dowd; Wim van Lankveld; Jeremy C T Fairbank; Jacques van Limbeek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European spine journal review: a survey of the "medical" articles in European spine journal, 2019.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  What can we learn from long-term studies on chronic low back pain? A scoping review.

Authors:  Alisa L Dutmer; Remko Soer; André P Wolff; Michiel F Reneman; Maarten H Coppes; Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Non-surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity: results of an intensive combined physical and psychological programme for patients with adult spinal deformity and chronic low back pain-a treatment-based cohort study.

Authors:  Evelien H W Hoevenaars; Michiel Beekhuizen; John O'Dowd; Maarten Spruit; Miranda L van Hooff
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 4.  Rehabilitation for Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review for Managing Pain and Improving Function in Acute and Chronic Conditions.

Authors:  Joseph V Pergolizzi; Jo Ann LeQuang
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2020-01-31

5.  The Importance of Perceived Relevance: A Qualitative Evaluation of Patient's Perceptions of Value and Impact Following a Low-Intensity Group-Based Pain Management Program.

Authors:  Joshua W Pate; Elizabeth Tran; Seema Radhakrishnan; Andrew M Leaver
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Development and Usability Testing of a Web-Based and Therapist-Assisted Coping Skills Program for Managing Psychosocial Problems in Individuals With Hand and Upper Limb Injuries: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Folarin Omoniyi Babatunde; Joy MacDermid; Ruby Grewal; Luciana Macedo; Mike Szekeres
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2020-05-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.