Literature DB >> 21150697

The trend in total cost of back pain in The Netherlands in the period 2002 to 2007.

Ludeke C Lambeek1, Maurits W van Tulder, Ilse C S Swinkels, Lando L J Koppes, Johannes R Anema, Willlem van Mechelen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cost of illness study.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the total costs of back pain in The Netherlands over the years 2002 to 2007. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In 1991, the cost of back pain to the Dutch society was estimated at € 4.2 billion. In the last two decades, new laws regarding health insurance and sickness benefits and new guidelines for health care professionals have been introduced and may have affected the societal costs of back pain in The Netherlands.
METHODS: We conducted a cost-of-illness study in which we gathered relevant available data from national registries, reports of research institutes, descriptive studies, and occupational health care authorities to estimate the total cost of back pain to the Dutch society for the years 2002 to 2007. RESULTS.: The total costs of back pain decreased from € 4.3 billion in 2002 to € 3.5 billion in 2007. The share of these costs was about 0.9% of the gross national product (GNP) in 2002 and 0.6% of GNP in 2007. The ratio between direct and indirect costs did not change noticeably over the years, that is, 12% for direct and 88% for indirect costs.
CONCLUSIONS: The total societal costs of back pain have decreased since 1991 and also between 2002 and 2007. Although Dutch policy interventions to lower the indirect costs seem to be successful in the last decades, costs of back pain are still substantial, and indirect costs represent the majority of these costs. Policy interventions and implementation of cost-effective interventions focusing on return-to-work management for back pain in health care is important to further decrease the economic burden of back pain on society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21150697     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e70488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  74 in total

1.  Long-term results of an intensive cognitive behavioral pain management program for patients with chronic low back pain: a concise report of an extended cohort with a minimum of 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  D Groot; M L van Hooff; R J Kroeze; M Monshouwer; J O'Dowd; P Horsting; M Spruit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Alessandro Chiarotto; Richard A Deyo; Caroline B Terwee; Maarten Boers; Rachelle Buchbinder; Terry P Corbin; Leonardo O P Costa; Nadine E Foster; Margreth Grotle; Bart W Koes; Francisco M Kovacs; Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Chris G Maher; Adam M Pearson; Wilco C Peul; Mark L Schoene; Dennis C Turk; Maurits W van Tulder; Raymond W Ostelo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare utilization and absence from work.

Authors:  G P G Lemmers; W van Lankveld; G P Westert; P J van der Wees; J B Staal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview.

Authors:  Crystian B Oliveira; Chris G Maher; Rafael Z Pinto; Adrian C Traeger; Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Jean-François Chenot; Maurits van Tulder; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  The evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Sidney M Rubinstein; Paul C Willems; Wouter A Moojen; Ferran Pellisé; Cumhur F Oner; Wilco C Peul; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Which patient-reported factors predict referral to spinal surgery? A cohort study among 4987 chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Johanna M van Dongen; Miranda L van Hooff; Maarten Spruit; Marinus de Kleuver; Raymond W J G Ostelo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Intradiscal pressure depends on recent loading and correlates with disc height and compressive stiffness.

Authors:  Pieter-Paul A Vergroesen; Albert J van der Veen; Barend J van Royen; Idsart Kingma; Theo H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Epidemiology of chronic back pain among adults and elderly from Southern Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Elizabet Saes-Silva; Yohana Pereira Vieira; Mirelle de Oliveira Saes; Rodrigo Dalke Meucci; Priscila Aikawa; Ewerton Cousin; Letícia Maria Almeida da Silva; Samuel Carvalho Dumith
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 9.  Traction for low-back pain with or without sciatica.

Authors:  Inge Wegner; Indah S Widyahening; Maurits W van Tulder; Stefan E I Blomberg; Henrica Cw de Vet; Gert Brønfort; Lex M Bouter; Geert J van der Heijden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-19

Review 10.  Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers.

Authors:  Sharon P Parry; Pieter Coenen; Nipun Shrestha; Peter B O'Sullivan; Christopher G Maher; Leon M Straker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.