Joshua W Pate1,2,3, Elizabeth Tran2, Seema Radhakrishnan2, Andrew M Leaver2,3. 1. Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney 2007, Australia. 2. Westmead Hospital Pain Management Centre, Sydney 2145, Australia. 3. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney 2141, Australia.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Limited evidence exists exploring perceptions of which aspects of a pain management program are perceived as valuable and impactful. The aim of this study was to explore patient beliefs about which aspects of a pain management program were valued and/or had perceived impact. Materials and Methods: One-on-one structured interviews were conducted with 11 adults three months after their completion of the Spark Pain Program at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Concepts in the transcripts were inductively identified and explored, utilizing thematic analysis to better understand their relevance to the study aim. Results: Four themes emerged: (1) "The program overall was positive, but…"; (2) "I valued my improved knowledge and understanding of pain, but…"; (3) "I valued the stretching/relaxation/pacing/activity monitoring"; and (4) "I valued being part of a supportive and understanding group". Participants reported that they liked being treated as an individual within the group. A lack of perceived personal relevance of key messages was identified in some participants; it appears that patients in pain programs must determine that changes in knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes are personally relevant in order for the changes to have a significant impact on them. Conclusions: This study provides new insights into aspects of a pain management program that were perceived as valuable and impactful, areas that "missed the mark", and hypotheses to guide the implementation of service delivery and program redesign.
Background and objectives: Limited evidence exists exploring perceptions of which aspects of a pain management program are perceived as valuable and impactful. The aim of this study was to explore patient beliefs about which aspects of a pain management program were valued and/or had perceived impact. Materials and Methods: One-on-one structured interviews were conducted with 11 adults three months after their completion of the Spark Pain Program at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Concepts in the transcripts were inductively identified and explored, utilizing thematic analysis to better understand their relevance to the study aim. Results: Four themes emerged: (1) "The program overall was positive, but…"; (2) "I valued my improved knowledge and understanding of pain, but…"; (3) "I valued the stretching/relaxation/pacing/activity monitoring"; and (4) "I valued being part of a supportive and understanding group". Participants reported that they liked being treated as an individual within the group. A lack of perceived personal relevance of key messages was identified in some participants; it appears that patients in pain programs must determine that changes in knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes are personally relevant in order for the changes to have a significant impact on them. Conclusions: This study provides new insights into aspects of a pain management program that were perceived as valuable and impactful, areas that "missed the mark", and hypotheses to guide the implementation of service delivery and program redesign.
Authors: James A Watson; Cormac G Ryan; Lesley Cooper; Dominic Ellington; Robbie Whittle; Michael Lavender; John Dixon; Greg Atkinson; Kay Cooper; Denis J Martin Journal: J Pain Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Ellen M Håland Haldorsen; Astrid L Grasdal; Jan Sture Skouen; Alf Erling Risa; Karsten Kronholm; Holger Ursin Journal: Pain Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Mary A Driscoll; M Tish Knobf; Diana M Higgins; Alicia Heapy; Allison Lee; Sally Haskell Journal: Pain Med Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 3.750